From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] Add Transmission package
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:34:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E8EF1E9.4080500@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87botvnr6s.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
Hi Peter,
On 05/10/2011 22:01, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>>>>> "Maxime" == Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> writes:
>
> Maxime> From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@free-electrons.com>
> Maxime> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@free-electrons.com>
>
> Isn't this based on some of the earlier transmission patches? If so, it
> would be good to give those authors some credits.
Indeed, I've taken as a base as a base patches from
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=743, and kept the authorship
for the init script, but for the .mk, as it was
incomplete/trivial/outdated, I did not mentionned authorship. Should I ?
> Maxime> +++ b/package/transmission/transmission.mk
> Maxime> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
> Maxime> +#############################################################
> Maxime> +#
> Maxime> +# transmission
> Maxime> +#
> Maxime> +#############################################################
> Maxime> +TRANSMISSION_VERSION = 2.33
> Maxime> +TRANSMISSION_SITE = http://download.transmissionbt.com/files/
> Maxime> +TRANSMISSION_SOURCE = transmission-$(TRANSMISSION_VERSION).tar.bz2
> Maxime> +TRANSMISSION_DEPENDENCIES = \
> Maxime> + host-pkg-config \
> Maxime> + libcurl \
> Maxime> + libevent \
> Maxime> + openssl \
> Maxime> + zlib
> Maxime> +
> Maxime> +TRANSMISSION_CONF_OPT = \
> Maxime> + --disable-gtk \
> Maxime> + --disable-libnotify \
> Maxime> + --disable-nls \
>
> --disable-nls is normally handled automatically (depending on if the
> toolchain has locale support or not - See package/Makefile.in).
Ah, nice :)
> Maxime> + --enable-lightweight
> Maxime> +
> Maxime> +define TRANSMISSION_INIT_SCRIPT_INSTALL
> Maxime> + $(INSTALL) -m 0755 -D package/transmission/S92transmission \
> Maxime> + $(TARGET_DIR)/etc/init.d/S92transmission
>
> The init script seems to have some configuration settings which might
> not suit everyone. For those cases we typically only install the file if
> it isn't already present in the rootfs skeleton - E.G. something like:
>
> [ -f $(TARGET_DIR)/etc/init.d/S92transmission ] || $(INSTALL) -m 0755 -D ..
You're right, will do.
>
> Maxime> +ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_TRANSMISSION_REMOTE),y)
> Maxime> + TRANSMISSION_CONF_OPT += --enable-remote
> Maxime> +else
> Maxime> + TRANSMISSION_CONF_OPT += --disable-remote
> Maxime> + TRANSMISSION_POST_INSTALL_TARGET_HOOKS += TRANSMISSION_INIT_SCRIPT_INSTALL
>
> I don't really know transmission, but why is the init script only
> installed if this option isn't enabled? Transmission is a server
> (daemon), right? Presumably we should either have an option to not
> install the server (so you can use the -remote program to talk to a
> server on another machine). If we do that, the CLI option should depend
> on the server one.
As far as i can tell, the real back-end for transmission is
libtransmission, not transmission-daemon. transmission-daemon relies on
libtransmission just like transmission-gtk, but are both independant
from each other. But in order to control transmission-daemon, you might
need transmission-remote.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-07 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-03 10:10 [Buildroot] [pull request v2] Pull request for branch for-2011.11/packages Maxime Ripard
2011-10-03 10:10 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] Add the picocom package Maxime Ripard
2011-10-05 19:51 ` Peter Korsgaard
2011-10-03 10:10 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] Add Transmission package Maxime Ripard
2011-10-05 20:01 ` Peter Korsgaard
2011-10-07 12:34 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2011-10-12 15:22 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH] " Maxime Ripard
2011-11-14 12:17 ` Maxime Ripard
2011-11-17 20:03 ` Peter Korsgaard
2011-10-03 10:10 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] Add lame support in gstreamer Maxime Ripard
2011-10-05 20:02 ` Peter Korsgaard
2011-10-03 10:10 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] Add the libplayer package Maxime Ripard
2011-10-05 20:16 ` Peter Korsgaard
2011-10-06 8:19 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2011-10-06 8:47 ` Peter Korsgaard
2011-10-06 9:08 ` Peter Korsgaard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-09-28 11:48 [Buildroot] [pull request] Pull request for branch for-2011.11/packages Maxime Ripard
2011-09-28 11:48 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] Add Transmission package Maxime Ripard
2011-09-28 12:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E8EF1E9.4080500@free-electrons.com \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox