From: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.com>
To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ECONNREFUSED implies OSD definitely failed
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:32:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160428143251.GA1541@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1604221221000.8831@cpach.fuggernut.com>
On 2016-04-22T12:24:52, Sage Weil <sweil@redhat.com> wrote:
> Piotr has a PR at
>
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/8558
>
> that changes the messenger and OSD logic so that if we get an ECONNREFUSED
> trying to talk to another OSD we can definitively conclude that the OSD is
> down/failed, without waiting for the normal heartbeat timeout.
>
> I think this is true in normal networking environments. My only concern
> is that there might be cases where the OSD isn't actually down and some
> transient network issue could cause ECONNREFUSED. Like... some
> firewally magic networky thing. If a transient ECONNREFUSED was possible,
> it could cause some ugly flapping.
>
> Can anyone think of something that might cause this? Even if it is
> something obscure, it means we should have a config option to disable this
> new behavior (we probably should anyway).
Exactly this - the system reconfiguring it's network interfaces and
firewall rules (in a suboptimal fashion; it should drop, not reject, but
...).
Or a duplicate IP address (with a node that isn't running ceph-osd).
Again, not supposed to happen.
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-28 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-22 16:24 ECONNREFUSED implies OSD definitely failed Sage Weil
2016-04-28 14:32 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree [this message]
2016-04-29 7:46 ` Piotr Dałek
2016-04-29 12:29 ` Sage Weil
2016-04-29 12:32 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2016-04-29 19:02 ` Piotr Dałek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160428143251.GA1541@suse.de \
--to=lmb@suse.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox