public inbox for cgroups@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Haitao Huang
	<haitao.huang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
	dave.hansen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org,
	tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-sgx-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org,
	mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	bp-Gina5bIWoIWzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org,
	hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	sohil.mehta-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Cc: zhiquan1.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	kristen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org,
	seanjc-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	zhanb-0li6OtcxBFHby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org,
	anakrish-0li6OtcxBFHby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org,
	mikko.ylinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org,
	yangjie-0li6OtcxBFHby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/18] x86/sgx: Add EPC OOM path to forcefully reclaim EPC
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 18:34:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CVHWE8HC4SHA.FU2XVIXN6WB7@suppilovahvero> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230913040635.28815-13-haitao.huang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>

On Wed Sep 13, 2023 at 7:06 AM EEST, Haitao Huang wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>
> Introduce the OOM path for killing an enclave with a reclaimer that is no
> longer able to reclaim enough EPC pages. Find a victim enclave, which
> will be an enclave with only "unreclaimable" EPC pages left in the
> cgroup LRU lists. Once a victim is identified, mark the enclave as OOM
> and zap the enclave's entire page range, and drain all mm references in
> encl->mm_list. Block allocating any EPC pages in #PF handler, or
> reloading any pages in all paths, or creating any new mappings.
>
> The OOM killing path may race with the reclaimers: in some cases, the
> victim enclave is in the process of reclaiming the last EPC pages when
> OOM happens, that is, all pages other than SECS and VA pages are in
> RECLAIMING_IN_PROGRESS state. The reclaiming process requires access to
> the enclave backing, VA pages as well as SECS. So the OOM killer does
> not directly release those enclave resources, instead, it lets all
> reclaiming in progress to finish, and relies (as currently done) on
> kref_put on encl->refcount to trigger sgx_encl_release() to do the
> final cleanup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> V4:
> - Updates for patch reordering and typo fixes.
>
> V3:
> - Rebased to use the new VMA_ITERATOR to zap VMAs.
> - Fixed the racing cases by blocking new page allocation/mapping and
> reloading when enclave is marked for OOM. And do not release any enclave
> resources other than draining mm_list entries, and let pages in
> RECLAIMING_IN_PROGRESS to be reaped by reclaimers.
> - Due to above changes, also removed the no-longer needed encl->lock in
> the OOM path which was causing deadlocks reported by the lock prover.
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver.c |  27 +-----
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c   |  48 ++++++++++-
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h   |   2 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c  |   9 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c   | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h    |   1 +
>  6 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver.c
> index 262f5fb18d74..ff42d649c7b6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,6 @@ static int sgx_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  static int sgx_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  {
>  	struct sgx_encl *encl = file->private_data;
> -	struct sgx_encl_mm *encl_mm;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Drain the remaining mm_list entries. At this point the list contains
> @@ -52,31 +51,7 @@ static int sgx_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  	 * not exited yet. The processes, which have exited, are gone from the
>  	 * list by sgx_mmu_notifier_release().
>  	 */
> -	for ( ; ; )  {
> -		spin_lock(&encl->mm_lock);
> -
> -		if (list_empty(&encl->mm_list)) {
> -			encl_mm = NULL;
> -		} else {
> -			encl_mm = list_first_entry(&encl->mm_list,
> -						   struct sgx_encl_mm, list);
> -			list_del_rcu(&encl_mm->list);
> -		}
> -
> -		spin_unlock(&encl->mm_lock);
> -
> -		/* The enclave is no longer mapped by any mm. */
> -		if (!encl_mm)
> -			break;
> -
> -		synchronize_srcu(&encl->srcu);
> -		mmu_notifier_unregister(&encl_mm->mmu_notifier, encl_mm->mm);
> -		kfree(encl_mm);
> -
> -		/* 'encl_mm' is gone, put encl_mm->encl reference: */
> -		kref_put(&encl->refcount, sgx_encl_release);
> -	}
> -
> +	sgx_encl_mm_drain(encl);
>  	kref_put(&encl->refcount, sgx_encl_release);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
> index bf0ac3677ca8..85b6f218f029 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
> @@ -453,6 +453,9 @@ static vm_fault_t sgx_vma_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>  	if (unlikely(!encl))
>  		return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
>  
> +	if (test_bit(SGX_ENCL_OOM, &encl->flags))
> +		return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * The page_array keeps track of all enclave pages, whether they
>  	 * are swapped out or not. If there is no entry for this page and
> @@ -651,7 +654,8 @@ static int sgx_vma_access(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
>  	if (!encl)
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  
> -	if (!test_bit(SGX_ENCL_DEBUG, &encl->flags))
> +	if (!test_bit(SGX_ENCL_DEBUG, &encl->flags) ||
> +	    test_bit(SGX_ENCL_OOM, &encl->flags))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < len; i += cnt) {
> @@ -776,6 +780,45 @@ void sgx_encl_release(struct kref *ref)
>  	kfree(encl);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * sgx_encl_mm_drain - drain all mm_list entries
> + * @encl:	address of the sgx_encl to drain
> + *
> + * Used during oom kill to empty the mm_list entries after they have been
> + * zapped. Or used by sgx_release to drain the remaining mm_list entries when
> + * the enclave fd is closing. After this call, sgx_encl_release will be called
> + * with kref_put.
> + */
> +void sgx_encl_mm_drain(struct sgx_encl *encl)
> +{
> +	struct sgx_encl_mm *encl_mm;
> +
> +	for ( ; ; )  {
> +		spin_lock(&encl->mm_lock);
> +
> +		if (list_empty(&encl->mm_list)) {
> +			encl_mm = NULL;
> +		} else {
> +			encl_mm = list_first_entry(&encl->mm_list,
> +						   struct sgx_encl_mm, list);
> +			list_del_rcu(&encl_mm->list);
> +		}
> +
> +		spin_unlock(&encl->mm_lock);
> +
> +		/* The enclave is no longer mapped by any mm. */
> +		if (!encl_mm)
> +			break;
> +
> +		synchronize_srcu(&encl->srcu);
> +		mmu_notifier_unregister(&encl_mm->mmu_notifier, encl_mm->mm);
> +		kfree(encl_mm);
> +
> +		/* 'encl_mm' is gone, put encl_mm->encl reference: */
> +		kref_put(&encl->refcount, sgx_encl_release);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * 'mm' is exiting and no longer needs mmu notifications.
>   */
> @@ -847,6 +890,9 @@ int sgx_encl_mm_add(struct sgx_encl *encl, struct mm_struct *mm)
>  	struct sgx_encl_mm *encl_mm;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (test_bit(SGX_ENCL_OOM, &encl->flags))
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Even though a single enclave may be mapped into an mm more than once,
>  	 * each 'mm' only appears once on encl->mm_list. This is guaranteed by
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h
> index 831d63f80f5a..47792fb00cee 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ enum sgx_encl_flags {
>  	SGX_ENCL_DEBUG		= BIT(1),
>  	SGX_ENCL_CREATED	= BIT(2),
>  	SGX_ENCL_INITIALIZED	= BIT(3),
> +	SGX_ENCL_OOM		= BIT(4),

Given how the constants are named before maybe SGX_ENCL_NO_MEMORY would
be more obvious.

>  };
>  
>  struct sgx_encl_mm {
> @@ -125,5 +126,6 @@ struct sgx_encl_page *sgx_encl_load_page(struct sgx_encl *encl,
>  					 unsigned long addr);
>  struct sgx_va_page *sgx_encl_grow(struct sgx_encl *encl, bool reclaim);
>  void sgx_encl_shrink(struct sgx_encl *encl, struct sgx_va_page *va_page);
> +void sgx_encl_mm_drain(struct sgx_encl *encl);
>  
>  #endif /* _X86_ENCL_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c
> index 8c23bb524674..1f65c79664a2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c
> @@ -421,6 +421,9 @@ static long sgx_ioc_enclave_add_pages(struct sgx_encl *encl, void __user *arg)
>  	    test_bit(SGX_ENCL_INITIALIZED, &encl->flags))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	if (test_bit(SGX_ENCL_OOM, &encl->flags))
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
>  	if (copy_from_user(&add_arg, arg, sizeof(add_arg)))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  
> @@ -606,6 +609,9 @@ static long sgx_ioc_enclave_init(struct sgx_encl *encl, void __user *arg)
>  	    test_bit(SGX_ENCL_INITIALIZED, &encl->flags))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	if (test_bit(SGX_ENCL_OOM, &encl->flags))
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
>  	if (copy_from_user(&init_arg, arg, sizeof(init_arg)))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  
> @@ -682,6 +688,9 @@ static int sgx_ioc_sgx2_ready(struct sgx_encl *encl)
>  	if (!test_bit(SGX_ENCL_INITIALIZED, &encl->flags))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	if (test_bit(SGX_ENCL_OOM, &encl->flags))
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
> index f3a3ed894616..c8900d62cfff 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
> @@ -621,6 +621,146 @@ void sgx_free_epc_page(struct sgx_epc_page *page)
>  	atomic_long_inc(&sgx_nr_free_pages);
>  }
>  
> +static bool sgx_oom_get_ref(struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page)
> +{
> +	struct sgx_encl *encl;
> +
> +	if (epc_page->flags & SGX_EPC_OWNER_PAGE)
> +		encl = epc_page->encl_page->encl;
> +	else if (epc_page->flags & SGX_EPC_OWNER_ENCL)
> +		encl = epc_page->encl;
> +	else
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return kref_get_unless_zero(&encl->refcount);
> +}
> +
> +static struct sgx_epc_page *sgx_oom_get_victim(struct sgx_epc_lru_lists *lru)
> +{
> +	struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page, *tmp;
> +
> +	if (list_empty(&lru->unreclaimable))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(epc_page, tmp, &lru->unreclaimable, list) {
> +		list_del_init(&epc_page->list);
> +
> +		if (sgx_oom_get_ref(epc_page))
> +			return epc_page;
> +	}
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static void sgx_epc_oom_zap(void *owner, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> +			    unsigned long end, const struct vm_operations_struct *ops)
> +{
> +	VMA_ITERATOR(vmi, mm, start);
> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +
> +	/**
> +	 * Use end because start can be zero and not mapped into
> +	 * enclave even if encl->base = 0.
> +	 */
> +	for_each_vma_range(vmi, vma, end) {
> +		if (vma->vm_ops == ops && vma->vm_private_data == owner &&
> +		    vma->vm_start < end) {
> +			zap_vma_pages(vma);
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static bool sgx_oom_encl(struct sgx_encl *encl)
> +{
> +	unsigned long mm_list_version;
> +	struct sgx_encl_mm *encl_mm;
> +	bool ret = false;
> +	int idx;
> +
> +	if (!test_bit(SGX_ENCL_CREATED, &encl->flags))
> +		goto out_put;
> +
> +	/* Done OOM on this enclave previously, do not redo it.
> +	 * This may happen when the SECS page is still UNRECLAIMABLE because
> +	 * another page is in RECLAIM_IN_PROGRESS. Still return true so OOM
> +	 * killer can wait until the reclaimer done with the hold-up page and
> +	 * SECS before it move on to find another victim.
> +	 */
> +	if (test_bit(SGX_ENCL_OOM, &encl->flags))
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	set_bit(SGX_ENCL_OOM, &encl->flags);
> +
> +	do {
> +		mm_list_version = encl->mm_list_version;
> +
> +		/* Pairs with smp_rmb() in sgx_encl_mm_add(). */
> +		smp_rmb();
> +
> +		idx = srcu_read_lock(&encl->srcu);
> +
> +		list_for_each_entry_rcu(encl_mm, &encl->mm_list, list) {
> +			if (!mmget_not_zero(encl_mm->mm))
> +				continue;
> +
> +			mmap_read_lock(encl_mm->mm);
> +
> +			sgx_epc_oom_zap(encl, encl_mm->mm, encl->base,
> +					encl->base + encl->size, &sgx_vm_ops);
> +
> +			mmap_read_unlock(encl_mm->mm);
> +
> +			mmput_async(encl_mm->mm);
> +		}
> +
> +		srcu_read_unlock(&encl->srcu, idx);
> +	} while (WARN_ON_ONCE(encl->mm_list_version != mm_list_version));
> +
> +	sgx_encl_mm_drain(encl);
> +out:
> +	ret = true;
> +
> +out_put:
> +	/*
> +	 * This puts the refcount we took when we identified this enclave as
> +	 * an OOM victim.
> +	 */
> +	kref_put(&encl->refcount, sgx_encl_release);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool sgx_oom_encl_page(struct sgx_encl_page *encl_page)
> +{
> +	return sgx_oom_encl(encl_page->encl);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * sgx_epc_oom() - invoke EPC out-of-memory handling on target LRU
> + * @lru:	LRU that is low
> + *
> + * Return:	%true if a victim was found and kicked.
> + */
> +bool sgx_epc_oom(struct sgx_epc_lru_lists *lru)
> +{
> +	struct sgx_epc_page *victim;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&lru->lock);
> +	victim = sgx_oom_get_victim(lru);
> +	spin_unlock(&lru->lock);
> +
> +	if (!victim)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (victim->flags & SGX_EPC_OWNER_PAGE)
> +		return sgx_oom_encl_page(victim->encl_page);
> +
> +	if (victim->flags & SGX_EPC_OWNER_ENCL)
> +		return sgx_oom_encl(victim->encl);
> +
> +	/*Will never happen unless we add more owner types in future */
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static bool __init sgx_setup_epc_section(u64 phys_addr, u64 size,
>  					 unsigned long index,
>  					 struct sgx_epc_section *section)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h
> index e210af77f0cf..3818be5a8bd3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h
> @@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ void sgx_reclaim_direct(void);
>  void sgx_record_epc_page(struct sgx_epc_page *page, unsigned long flags);
>  int sgx_drop_epc_page(struct sgx_epc_page *page);
>  struct sgx_epc_page *sgx_alloc_epc_page(void *owner, bool reclaim);
> +bool sgx_epc_oom(struct sgx_epc_lru_lists *lrus);
>  
>  void sgx_ipi_cb(void *info);
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1

BR, Jarkko

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-13 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-13  4:06 [PATCH v4 00/18] Add Cgroup support for SGX EPC memory Haitao Huang
     [not found] ` <20230913040635.28815-1-haitao.huang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2023-09-13  4:06   ` [PATCH v4 01/18] cgroup/misc: Add per resource callbacks for CSS events Haitao Huang
     [not found]     ` <20230913040635.28815-2-haitao.huang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2023-09-13  9:39       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-16  4:11         ` Haitao Huang
     [not found]           ` <op.2bci9anpwjvjmi-yDQzE4XY+yVaPPhiJ6yCxLKMmGWinSIL2HeeBUIffwg@public.gmane.org>
2023-09-25 16:57             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-25 16:57               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-15 17:55     ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]       ` <ZQSaoXBg-X4cwFdX-qYNAdHglDFBN0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org>
2023-09-15 17:58         ` Tejun Heo
2023-09-16  1:27           ` Haitao Huang
2023-09-13  4:06   ` [PATCH v4 02/18] cgroup/misc: Add SGX EPC resource type and export APIs for SGX driver Haitao Huang
     [not found]     ` <20230913040635.28815-3-haitao.huang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2023-09-13  9:43       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-13  4:06   ` [PATCH v4 03/18] x86/sgx: Add sgx_epc_lru_lists to encapsulate LRU lists Haitao Huang
     [not found]     ` <20230913040635.28815-4-haitao.huang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2023-09-13  9:46       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-14 10:31       ` Huang, Kai
     [not found]         ` <851f9b3043732c17cd8f86a77ccee0b7c6caa22f.camel-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2023-09-14 16:13           ` Dave Hansen
2023-09-14 21:58             ` Huang, Kai
2023-09-15 16:28         ` Haitao Huang
2023-09-13  4:06   ` [PATCH v4 04/18] x86/sgx: Use sgx_epc_lru_lists for existing active page list Haitao Huang
     [not found]     ` <20230913040635.28815-5-haitao.huang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2023-09-13 15:00       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-13  4:06   ` [PATCH v4 05/18] x86/sgx: Store reclaimable EPC pages in sgx_epc_lru_lists Haitao Huang
     [not found]     ` <20230913040635.28815-6-haitao.huang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2023-09-13 15:14       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-13  4:06   ` [PATCH v4 06/18] x86/sgx: Introduce EPC page states Haitao Huang
     [not found]     ` <20230913040635.28815-7-haitao.huang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2023-09-13 15:15       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-13  4:06   ` [PATCH v4 07/18] x86/sgx: Introduce RECLAIM_IN_PROGRESS state Haitao Huang
2023-09-13  4:06   ` [PATCH v4 08/18] x86/sgx: Use a list to track to-be-reclaimed pages Haitao Huang
     [not found]     ` <20230913040635.28815-9-haitao.huang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2023-09-13 15:30       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-13  4:06   ` [PATCH v4 09/18] x86/sgx: Store struct sgx_encl when allocating new VA pages Haitao Huang
     [not found]     ` <20230913040635.28815-10-haitao.huang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2023-09-13 15:31       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-13  4:06   ` [PATCH v4 10/18] x86/sgx: Add EPC page flags to identify owner types Haitao Huang
2023-09-13  4:06   ` [PATCH v4 11/18] x86/sgx: store unreclaimable pages in LRU lists Haitao Huang
     [not found]     ` <20230913040635.28815-12-haitao.huang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2023-09-13 15:33       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-13  4:06   ` [PATCH v4 12/18] x86/sgx: Add EPC OOM path to forcefully reclaim EPC Haitao Huang
     [not found]     ` <20230913040635.28815-13-haitao.huang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2023-09-13 15:34       ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2023-09-16  4:19         ` Haitao Huang
2023-09-13  4:06   ` [PATCH v4 13/18] x86/sgx: Expose sgx_reclaim_pages() for use by EPC cgroup Haitao Huang
2023-09-13 15:36     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-13  4:06   ` [PATCH v4 14/18] x86/sgx: Add helper to grab pages from an arbitrary EPC LRU Haitao Huang
2023-09-13  4:06   ` [PATCH v4 15/18] x86/sgx: Prepare for multiple LRUs Haitao Huang
     [not found]     ` <20230913040635.28815-16-haitao.huang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2023-09-13 15:42       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-16  4:18         ` Haitao Huang
2023-09-13  4:06   ` [PATCH v4 16/18] x86/sgx: Limit process EPC usage with misc cgroup controller Haitao Huang
2023-09-13 15:48     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-13  4:06   ` [PATCH v4 17/18] Docs/x86/sgx: Add description for cgroup support Haitao Huang
2023-09-13  4:06   ` [PATCH v4 18/18] selftests/sgx: Add scripts for epc cgroup testing Haitao Huang
2023-09-15 18:26   ` [PATCH v4 00/18] Add Cgroup support for SGX EPC memory Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CVHWE8HC4SHA.FU2XVIXN6WB7@suppilovahvero \
    --to=jarkko-dgejt+ai2ygdnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=anakrish-0li6OtcxBFHby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bp-Gina5bIWoIWzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=haitao.huang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kristen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-sgx-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mikko.ylinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=seanjc-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sohil.mehta-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=yangjie-0li6OtcxBFHby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=zhanb-0li6OtcxBFHby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=zhiquan1.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox