* [PATCH] cgroup: cleanup the format of /proc/cgroups
@ 2022-08-21 7:34 Feng Tang
[not found] ` <20220821073446.92669-1-feng.tang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Feng Tang @ 2022-08-21 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo, Zefan Li, Johannes Weiner,
cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Cc: Feng Tang
Currrent /proc/cgroup output is like:
#subsys_name hierarchy num_cgroups enabled
cpuset 6 1 1
cpu 4 7 1
cpuacct 4 7 1
blkio 8 7 1
memory 9 7 1
...
Add some indentation to make it more readable without any functional
change:
#subsys_name hierarchy num_cgroups enabled
cpuset 8 1 1
cpu 4 7 1
cpuacct 4 7 1
blkio 2 7 1
memory 5 7 1
...
Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
---
kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
index 2ade21b54dc4..e370ce3afdad 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
@@ -670,14 +670,20 @@ int proc_cgroupstats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
struct cgroup_subsys *ss;
int i;
- seq_puts(m, "#subsys_name\thierarchy\tnum_cgroups\tenabled\n");
+ seq_printf(m, "%-20s %-16s %-16s %-16s\n",
+ "#subsys_name",
+ "hierarchy",
+ "num_cgroups",
+ "enabled"
+ );
+
/*
* Grab the subsystems state racily. No need to add avenue to
* cgroup_mutex contention.
*/
for_each_subsys(ss, i)
- seq_printf(m, "%s\t%d\t%d\t%d\n",
+ seq_printf(m, "%-20s %-16d %-16d %-16d\n",
ss->legacy_name, ss->root->hierarchy_id,
atomic_read(&ss->root->nr_cgrps),
cgroup_ssid_enabled(i));
--
2.27.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cgroup: cleanup the format of /proc/cgroups
[not found] ` <20220821073446.92669-1-feng.tang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
@ 2022-08-22 7:30 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <YwMwlMv/tK3sRXbB-NiLfg/pYEd1N0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2022-08-22 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Feng Tang; +Cc: Zefan Li, Johannes Weiner, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 03:34:46PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> Currrent /proc/cgroup output is like:
>
> #subsys_name hierarchy num_cgroups enabled
> cpuset 6 1 1
> cpu 4 7 1
> cpuacct 4 7 1
> blkio 8 7 1
> memory 9 7 1
> ...
>
> Add some indentation to make it more readable without any functional
> change:
So, this has been suggested a couple times before and I fully agree that the
file is really ugly. In the past, we didn't pull the trigger on it for two
reasons - 1. It is user-visible functional change in that it can break
really dumb parsers 2. the file is only useful for cgroup1 which has been in
mostly maintenance mode for many years now. I don't feel that strongly
either way but still kinda lean towards just leaving it as-is.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cgroup: cleanup the format of /proc/cgroups
[not found] ` <YwMwlMv/tK3sRXbB-NiLfg/pYEd1N0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2022-08-22 7:52 ` Feng Tang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Feng Tang @ 2022-08-22 7:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: Zefan Li, Johannes Weiner, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:30:28PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 03:34:46PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> > Currrent /proc/cgroup output is like:
> >
> > #subsys_name hierarchy num_cgroups enabled
> > cpuset 6 1 1
> > cpu 4 7 1
> > cpuacct 4 7 1
> > blkio 8 7 1
> > memory 9 7 1
> > ...
> >
> > Add some indentation to make it more readable without any functional
> > change:
>
> So, this has been suggested a couple times before and I fully agree that the
> file is really ugly. In the past, we didn't pull the trigger on it for two
> reasons - 1. It is user-visible functional change in that it can break
> really dumb parsers 2. the file is only useful for cgroup1 which has been in
> mostly maintenance mode for many years now. I don't feel that strongly
> either way but still kinda lean towards just leaving it as-is.
Ok, makes sense to me. Thanks for the explaination!
Thanks,
Feng
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-08-22 7:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-08-21 7:34 [PATCH] cgroup: cleanup the format of /proc/cgroups Feng Tang
[not found] ` <20220821073446.92669-1-feng.tang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2022-08-22 7:30 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <YwMwlMv/tK3sRXbB-NiLfg/pYEd1N0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org>
2022-08-22 7:52 ` Feng Tang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox