From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-7.5 3/5] memcg: use high_work for remote charges
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 13:29:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <as9nlkBxzFZSLd5K@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261010210957.1350874-4-shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
On Sat 10-10-26 14:09:55, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> Some charges go to a cgroup outside the current mm's cgroup and its
> ancestors. The high handler uses current->mm, so it cannot handle these
> overages. Filesystem notifications and remote page faults can take
> this path.
Hmm, you made me look at other places in the charge path where we are
assuming current->memcg == memcg. We have reclaim recursion and oom
checks. The former makes sense, for the latter it is likely not
harmful.
> Use mm_match_cgroup() before checking the high limits. If it does not
> match, use high_work instead of recording task overage or doing
> synchronous reclaim and throttling. Charges to the same cgroup or an
> ancestor keep their current handling. Tasks without an mm also use the
> worker.
>
> Like kernel threads, remote chargers skip memory.swap.high throttling
> and its high-event reporting, and a fast allocator can outrun the worker.
> The memory.max and memory.swap.max checks stay the same.
Makes sense.
> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Thanks!
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 8116fce6ab96..3456960cbe68 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2705,7 +2705,8 @@ static void memcg_enforce_high(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages,
> gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> bool allow_spinning = gfpflags_allow_spinning(gfp_mask);
> - bool use_worker = !in_task() || (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD);
> + bool use_worker = !in_task() || (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD) ||
> + !current->mm || !mm_match_cgroup(current->mm, memcg);
>
> /*
> * If the hierarchy is above the normal consumption range, schedule
> @@ -2728,6 +2729,7 @@ static void memcg_enforce_high(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages,
> * Don't make an unrelated interrupted task handle this charge.
> * Kernel threads may be working for other tasks, so let a worker
> * reclaim instead.
> + * Remote charges need reclaim from their charged hierarchy.
> */
> if (use_worker) {
> if (mem_high) {
> @@ -2756,7 +2758,7 @@ static void memcg_enforce_high(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages,
> }
> } while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)));
>
> - /* Interrupts and kernel threads stop here. */
> + /* Interrupts, kernel threads, and remote chargers stop here. */
> if (use_worker)
> return;
>
> --
> 2.53.0-Meta
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-10 21:09 [PATCH for-7.5 0/5] memcg: clean up memory.high enforcement Shakeel Butt
2026-10-10 21:09 ` [PATCH for-7.5 1/5] memcg: move memory.high enforcement out of try_charge_memcg() Shakeel Butt
2026-10-12 13:22 ` Harry Yoo
2026-10-12 17:13 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-10-14 11:13 ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-10 21:09 ` [PATCH for-7.5 2/5] memcg: use high_work for kernel threads Shakeel Butt
2026-10-14 11:21 ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-10 21:09 ` [PATCH for-7.5 3/5] memcg: use high_work for remote charges Shakeel Butt
2026-10-14 11:29 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2026-10-10 21:09 ` [PATCH for-7.5 4/5] memcg: avoid queuing high_work from reclaim Shakeel Butt
2026-10-14 11:39 ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-14 16:06 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-10-14 16:59 ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-14 17:55 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-10-10 21:09 ` [PATCH for-7.5 5/5] memcg: simplify high limit handling after a charge Shakeel Butt
2026-10-14 11:46 ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-14 17:43 ` Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=as9nlkBxzFZSLd5K@tiehlicka \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox