Linux cgroups development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-7.5 4/5] memcg: avoid queuing high_work from reclaim
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 13:39:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <as9p2uFqCQprwdnI@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261010210957.1350874-5-shakeel.butt@linux.dev>

On Sat 10-10-26 14:09:56, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> Kernel threads and remote chargers use high_work when memory.high is
> exceeded. Their allocations during reclaim can also charge memory,
> for example when zswap stores a page.
> 
> Without a check, the high_work worker can queue itself from its own
> reclaim. The pending bit is cleared before high_work runs, so each run
> can queue another run.

What does that mean really? Does this delays the actual run?
 
> Skip memory.high enforcement for charges from task context with
> PF_MEMALLOC set when they would use high_work. This covers kernel
> threads and remote charges. The memory is still charged. Interrupt
> charges keep their current path.
> 
> In a VM with incompressible zswap data, the worker queued itself 163 times
> without this check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>

The patch itself looks OK. I am wondering whether we can unify the check
with the existing one which forces the allocation through in main
charging path.

> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 3456960cbe68..d1e022e6572f 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2708,6 +2708,14 @@ static void memcg_enforce_high(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages,
>  	bool use_worker = !in_task() || (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD) ||
>  		!current->mm || !mm_match_cgroup(current->mm, memcg);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Reclaim can charge memory, for example when zswap stores a page.
> +	 * Don't queue high_work from a reclaiming task, or the
> +	 * high_work worker could keep queuing itself.
> +	 */
> +	if (in_task() && use_worker && (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC))
> +		return;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * If the hierarchy is above the normal consumption range, schedule
>  	 * reclaim on returning to userland.  We can perform reclaim here
> -- 
> 2.53.0-Meta

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-14 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-10 21:09 [PATCH for-7.5 0/5] memcg: clean up memory.high enforcement Shakeel Butt
2026-10-10 21:09 ` [PATCH for-7.5 1/5] memcg: move memory.high enforcement out of try_charge_memcg() Shakeel Butt
2026-10-12 13:22   ` Harry Yoo
2026-10-12 17:13     ` Shakeel Butt
2026-10-14 11:13   ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-10 21:09 ` [PATCH for-7.5 2/5] memcg: use high_work for kernel threads Shakeel Butt
2026-10-14 11:21   ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-10 21:09 ` [PATCH for-7.5 3/5] memcg: use high_work for remote charges Shakeel Butt
2026-10-14 11:29   ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-10 21:09 ` [PATCH for-7.5 4/5] memcg: avoid queuing high_work from reclaim Shakeel Butt
2026-10-14 11:39   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2026-10-14 16:06     ` Shakeel Butt
2026-10-14 16:59       ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-14 17:55         ` Shakeel Butt
2026-10-10 21:09 ` [PATCH for-7.5 5/5] memcg: simplify high limit handling after a charge Shakeel Butt
2026-10-14 11:46   ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-14 17:43     ` Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=as9p2uFqCQprwdnI@tiehlicka \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox