Re: oops on resume

["Brian J. Murrell" <brian@interlinx.bc.ca>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1451 bytes --]

On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 23:51 +0100, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 06:10:28PM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> 
>  > here we are in time_cpufreq_notifier 1
> 1> calling cpufreq_scale(2162688, 2200000, 2200000)
> 1> here we are in cpufreq_scale 0, old = 2162688, div = 2200000, mult = 2200000
> 1> calling do_div(4757913600000, 2200000)
> 1> here we are in cpufreq_scale 1, returning 2162688
> 2> calling cpufreq_scale(2193684, 2200000, 2200000)
> 2> here we are in cpufreq_scale 0, old = 2193684, div = 2200000, mult = 2200000
> 2> calling do_div(4826104800000, 2200000)
> 2> here we are in cpufreq_scale 1, returning 2193684
>  > here we are in time_cpufreq_notifier 2, cpu_khz = 2193684
> 3> calling cpufreq_scale(1957878, 2200000, 2200000)
> 3> here we are in cpufreq_scale 0, old = 1957878, div = 2200000, mult = 2200000
> 3> calling do_div(4307331600000, 2200000)
> 3> here we are in cpufreq_scale 1, returning 1957878
>  > here we are in time_cpufreq_notifier 3, fast_gettimeoffset_quotient = 1957878
>  > here we are in set_cyc2ns_scale 0, cpu_mhz = 2193
> 
> Did you get the 3rd cpufreq_scale() call too ? I think that might be
> the one thats going awry.

Those are the three up there aren't they?  I've prefixed each block of
debug with the number of the cpufreq_scale() call.  I could be mistaken.

> (The one in the fast_gettimeoffset_quotient = .. line)

Yup, that's #3 up there isn't it?

b.


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Cpufreq mailing list
Cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq