Re: oops on resume

[Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 07:00:15PM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
 > On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 23:51 +0100, Dave Jones wrote:
 > > On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 06:10:28PM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
 > > 
 > >  > here we are in time_cpufreq_notifier 1
 > > 1> calling cpufreq_scale(2162688, 2200000, 2200000)
 > > 1> here we are in cpufreq_scale 0, old = 2162688, div = 2200000, mult = 2200000
 > > 1> calling do_div(4757913600000, 2200000)
 > > 1> here we are in cpufreq_scale 1, returning 2162688
 > > 2> calling cpufreq_scale(2193684, 2200000, 2200000)
 > > 2> here we are in cpufreq_scale 0, old = 2193684, div = 2200000, mult = 2200000
 > > 2> calling do_div(4826104800000, 2200000)
 > > 2> here we are in cpufreq_scale 1, returning 2193684
 > >  > here we are in time_cpufreq_notifier 2, cpu_khz = 2193684
 > > 3> calling cpufreq_scale(1957878, 2200000, 2200000)
 > > 3> here we are in cpufreq_scale 0, old = 1957878, div = 2200000, mult = 2200000
 > > 3> calling do_div(4307331600000, 2200000)
 > > 3> here we are in cpufreq_scale 1, returning 1957878
 > >  > here we are in time_cpufreq_notifier 3, fast_gettimeoffset_quotient = 1957878
 > >  > here we are in set_cyc2ns_scale 0, cpu_mhz = 2193
 > > 
 > > Did you get the 3rd cpufreq_scale() call too ? I think that might be
 > > the one thats going awry.
 > 
 > Those are the three up there aren't they?  I've prefixed each block of
 > debug with the number of the cpufreq_scale() call.  I could be mistaken.
 > 
 > > (The one in the fast_gettimeoffset_quotient = .. line)
 > 
 > Yup, that's #3 up there isn't it?

oops, couldnt see the wood for the trees.

hmm, puzzled.

		Dave