cpufreq Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.de>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: "Brian J. Murrell" <brian@interlinx.bc.ca>, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: oops on resume
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 23:03:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040805210349.GA23087@dominikbrodowski.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040805202941.GB28775@redhat.com>

On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 09:29:41PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 04:19:30PM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> 
>  > Yeah, me too.  Any (one have any) idea how to calculate fsb for that
>  > sucker?
> 
> Hunting for docs on developer.intel.com right now. So far I've turned
> up nothing useful. Can you edit pentium4_get_frequency() in arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-lib.c
> so that before the switch (fsb_code) {   add a
> 		printk ("FSB code = %d\n", fsb_code);

_and_ enable SPEEDSTEP_DEBUG in both speedstep-ich.c and speedstep-lib.c

> Hopefully, Intel are predictable and this is going to be '4'.
> 
>  > I may as well throw that code in there too to see if it
>  > alleviates the problem.
> 
> reminds me, moving speedstep's dprintk over to the same style
> as longhaul/powernow-k7 should happen sometime, then it's just a
> module parameter away instead of a recompile.

... though I'd prefer if it'd be done at the cpufreq-core level, i.e.
cpufreq_dprintk(); with a sysfs-exported ( /sys/parameters/cpufreq/debug )
boot-time parameter cpufreq.debug=1

	Dominik

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-05 21:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-05 19:02 oops on resume Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-05 19:26 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-05 19:34   ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-05 19:52     ` Dave Jones
2004-08-05 20:02       ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-05 20:08         ` Dave Jones
2004-08-05 20:19           ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-05 20:29             ` Dave Jones
2004-08-05 21:03               ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2004-08-05 21:26               ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-05 21:27                 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-05 21:29                 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-05 21:09             ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-05 21:45               ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-06 17:14                 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-06 17:43               ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-06 17:55                 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-06 21:13                   ` Dave Jones
2004-08-06 21:18                     ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-06 21:44                       ` Dave Jones
2004-08-06 22:10                         ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-06 22:51                           ` Dave Jones
2004-08-06 23:00                             ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-06 23:23                               ` Dave Jones
2004-08-07 13:24                   ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-07 19:03                     ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-08 16:24                       ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-09 13:37                         ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-09 14:53                           ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-09 17:27                         ` Brian J. Murrell
2004-08-09 19:38                           ` Dominik Brodowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040805210349.GA23087@dominikbrodowski.de \
    --to=linux@dominikbrodowski.de \
    --cc=brian@interlinx.bc.ca \
    --cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox