* Re: rebased cpufreq patch?
@ 2003-07-07 12:34 Dominik Brodowski
2003-07-07 17:38 ` Dave Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dominik Brodowski @ 2003-07-07 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: anders; +Cc: davej, cpufreq
> Hi there,
>
> Is there any chance of getting the CPUFreq patch rebased against
> 2.4.22-pre3 ?
I'll be working on an updated version within the next few days, check
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/cpufreq/ for updated patches, please.
> I have been using the two patches linux-2.4.20-cpufreq.patch and
> cpufreq-centrino.patch against 2.4.21-rc7-ac1 since June 12th without
> any problems. From what I can tell, it is working very well indeed, so
> if it could be included in -pre4 it'd be great.
IMHO it's no stuff for 2.4.22. Davej/Russell, what's your opinion about 2.4.
in general?
Dominik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: rebased cpufreq patch?
2003-07-07 12:34 rebased cpufreq patch? Dominik Brodowski
@ 2003-07-07 17:38 ` Dave Jones
2003-07-07 18:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2003-07-07 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dominik Brodowski; +Cc: anders, cpufreq
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:34:48PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Is there any chance of getting the CPUFreq patch rebased against
> > 2.4.22-pre3 ?
>
> I'll be working on an updated version within the next few days, check
> http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/cpufreq/ for updated patches, please.
>
> > I have been using the two patches linux-2.4.20-cpufreq.patch and
> > cpufreq-centrino.patch against 2.4.21-rc7-ac1 since June 12th without
> > any problems. From what I can tell, it is working very well indeed, so
> > if it could be included in -pre4 it'd be great.
>
> IMHO it's no stuff for 2.4.22. Davej/Russell, what's your opinion about 2.4.
> in general?
I've no objection really, but it does mean that we would be introducing
an already obsolete interface into mainline. (~Not htat that's really a
problem, we did already for 2.5 anyway).
Dave
--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: rebased cpufreq patch?
2003-07-07 17:38 ` Dave Jones
@ 2003-07-07 18:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2003-07-07 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Jones; +Cc: Dominik Brodowski, anders, cpufreq
On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 19:38, Dave Jones wrote:
> I've no objection really, but it does mean that we would be introducing
> an already obsolete interface into mainline. (~Not htat that's really a
> problem, we did already for 2.5 anyway).
I'd like to see the core in asap, if possible for .22, and I don't
care that much about the interface right now...
The point is that a bunch of recent Apple laptops boot at low speed
by default, and the only way I provide to switch them to full speed
is via cpufreq... That's one of the few bits still preventing me
to fully merge my "powermac" kernels into mainline.
Ben.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-07 18:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-07 12:34 rebased cpufreq patch? Dominik Brodowski
2003-07-07 17:38 ` Dave Jones
2003-07-07 18:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox