From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
To: davej@redhat.com, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: [PATCH 002/007] cpufreq_conservative: alter default responsiveness
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:55:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060326095521.GC17358@dominikbrodowski.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060326095338.GA17358@dominikbrodowski.de>
From: Alexander Clouter <alex@digriz.org.uk>
The sensible approach to making conservative less responsive than ondemand :)
As mentioned in patch [1/4]. We do not want conservative to shoot through
all the frequencies, its point (by default) is to slowly move through them.
By default its ten times less responsive.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Clouter <alex-kernel@digriz.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
e8a02572252f9115c2b8296c40fd8b985f06f872
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
index adecd31..3ca3cf0 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct c
if (latency == 0)
latency = 1;
- def_sampling_rate = latency *
+ def_sampling_rate = 10 * latency *
DEF_SAMPLING_RATE_LATENCY_MULTIPLIER;
if (def_sampling_rate < MIN_STAT_SAMPLING_RATE)
--
1.2.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-26 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-26 9:53 [git pull] cpufreq governor updates for 2.6.17 Dominik Brodowski
2006-03-26 9:54 ` [PATCH 001/007] cpufreq_conservative: aligning of codebase with ondemand Dominik Brodowski
2006-03-26 9:55 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2006-03-26 9:55 ` [PATCH 003/007] cpufreq_conservative: make for_each_cpu() safe Dominik Brodowski
2006-03-26 9:56 ` [PATCH 004/007] cpufreq_conservative: alternative initialise approach Dominik Brodowski
2006-03-26 9:57 ` [PATCH 005/007] cpufreq_ondemand: Warn if it cannot run due to too long transition latency Dominik Brodowski
2006-03-26 9:57 ` [PATCH 006/007] cpufreq_ondemand: keep ignore_nice_load value when it is reselected Dominik Brodowski
2006-03-26 9:57 ` [PATCH 007/007] cpufreq_ondemand: add range check Dominik Brodowski
2006-03-27 19:53 ` [git pull] cpufreq governor updates for 2.6.17 Dave Jones
2006-03-27 19:58 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-27 21:06 ` Dominik Brodowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060326095521.GC17358@dominikbrodowski.de \
--to=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox