From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [git pull] cpufreq governor updates for 2.6.17
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:06:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060327210609.GA23471@isilmar.linta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060327195310.GA647@redhat.com> <20060327195810.GB647@redhat.com>
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 02:58:10PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 02:53:10PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 11:53:39AM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > > Hi Dave,
> > >
> > > Please pull from
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brodo/cpufreq-2.6.git/
> > > for a few cpufreq updates for 2.6.17. The diffstat and list of changes
> > > follows, the patches will be sent out as individual mails as replies to this
> > > message.
> >
> > I'm not entirely sure what happened here.
> > I git pull'd from this, and ended up with a 59,886 line delta against Linus' tree.
> > As you sent the diffs too, I'll just apply-mbox them.
>
> pilot-error on my part, the pull succeeded.
In fact, it was my mistake, as I cloned a copy of Linus' tree, checked that
you didn't have anything new in your cpufreq tree since Linus' last pull, but
forgot to reset my cpufreq tree to the HEAD of your cpufreq tree... Sorry
about that,
Dominik
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-27 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-26 9:53 [git pull] cpufreq governor updates for 2.6.17 Dominik Brodowski
2006-03-26 9:54 ` [PATCH 001/007] cpufreq_conservative: aligning of codebase with ondemand Dominik Brodowski
2006-03-26 9:55 ` [PATCH 002/007] cpufreq_conservative: alter default responsiveness Dominik Brodowski
2006-03-26 9:55 ` [PATCH 003/007] cpufreq_conservative: make for_each_cpu() safe Dominik Brodowski
2006-03-26 9:56 ` [PATCH 004/007] cpufreq_conservative: alternative initialise approach Dominik Brodowski
2006-03-26 9:57 ` [PATCH 005/007] cpufreq_ondemand: Warn if it cannot run due to too long transition latency Dominik Brodowski
2006-03-26 9:57 ` [PATCH 006/007] cpufreq_ondemand: keep ignore_nice_load value when it is reselected Dominik Brodowski
2006-03-26 9:57 ` [PATCH 007/007] cpufreq_ondemand: add range check Dominik Brodowski
2006-03-27 19:53 ` [git pull] cpufreq governor updates for 2.6.17 Dave Jones
2006-03-27 19:58 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-27 21:06 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060327210609.GA23471@isilmar.linta.de \
--to=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox