From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>, damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: protect memcg_path kfree() with damon_sysfs_lock
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 17:41:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260423004148.74722-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260422203017.48F3EC19425@smtp.kernel.org>
On Wed, 22 Apr 2026 20:30:16 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s):
> - [High] Breaking from `mem_cgroup_iter()` without calling `mem_cgroup_iter_break()` leaks a cgroup reference in `damon_sysfs_memcg_path_to_id()`.
Nice finding, but not this patch's fault. I will separately work on this.
> --
>
> commit f19bff910905231adad168cfffc97ed67cb1fde3
> Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
>
> mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: protect memcg_path kfree() with damon_sysfs_lock
>
> This commit fixes a use-after-free vulnerability by using damon_sysfs_lock
> to protect concurrent user-direct reads and writes to the memcg_path sysfs
> file. The locking prevents readers from accessing the memory path buffer
> while it is being deallocated by a write operation.
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c b/mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c
> > index 5186966dafb35..8d32a20531d49 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > @@ -550,8 +555,13 @@ static ssize_t memcg_path_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > strscpy(path, buf, count + 1);
> > + if (!mutex_trylock(&damon_sysfs_lock)) {
> > + kfree(path);
> > + return -EBUSY;
> > + }
> > kfree(filter->memcg_path);
> > filter->memcg_path = path;
> > + mutex_unlock(&damon_sysfs_lock);
> > return count;
> > }
>
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but I noticed a pre-existing
> issue in this file.
>
> Does damon_sysfs_memcg_path_to_id() leak a cgroup reference when breaking
> early from the hierarchy walk?
>
> mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c:damon_sysfs_memcg_path_to_id() {
> ...
> for (memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, NULL, NULL); memcg;
> memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL)) {
> /* skip offlined memcg */
> if (!mem_cgroup_online(memcg))
> continue;
> if (damon_sysfs_memcg_path_eq(memcg, path, memcg_path)) {
> *id = mem_cgroup_id(memcg);
> found = true;
> break;
> }
> }
> ...
> }
>
> According to the API contract, if a hierarchy walk is aborted prematurely
> before a round-trip is complete, the caller must use
> mem_cgroup_iter_break(NULL, memcg) to drop the reference to the last visited
> cgroup.
>
> Because this is missing, could every successful resolution of a memcg path
> permanently leak a css reference?
>
> In environments where DAMON configurations are frequently updated (like
> dynamically profiling containers), this could lead to a buildup of "zombie"
> cgroups that cannot be destroyed, eventually pinning substantial kernel
> memory and causing system-wide memory exhaustion.
Nice finding. As Sashiko also mentions, not this patch's fault, though. I
will separately work on this.
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260422143503.71357-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1
>
Thanks,
SJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-23 0:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-22 14:34 [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: fix use-after-free for [memcg_]path SeongJae Park
2026-04-22 14:35 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: protect memcg_path kfree() with damon_sysfs_lock SeongJae Park
2026-04-22 20:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-23 0:41 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2026-04-22 14:35 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: protect path " SeongJae Park
2026-04-22 21:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-23 0:46 ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-22 14:40 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: fix use-after-free for [memcg_]path SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260423004148.74722-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox