From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>, damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1.1 03/13] mm/damon/core: use damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() in __damos_valid_target()
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2026 11:07:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260620180720.93325-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260620174137.53EFB1F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org>
On Sat, 20 Jun 2026 17:41:36 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] The new __damos_valid_target implementation uses damon_nr_accesses_mvsum(), which is vulnerable to time-of-check state desynchronization if ctx->next_aggregation_sis is updated asynchronously via kdamond_call(). This causes massive over-estimation of the target access frequency.
> --
>
> commit 2274522ec6ea648db508697b0a1f57a8bf4e864d
> Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
> Subject: mm/damon/core: use damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() in __damos_valid_target()
>
> This commit replaces the direct read of r->nr_accesses_bp with a call
> to damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() inside __damos_valid_target(). The author
> notes that while execution is slightly more expensive, the function is
> simpler and more tolerant to errors.
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> > index af95783d3402a..ee4f0f0e583bd 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> > @@ -2120,10 +2120,11 @@ static void kdamond_tune_intervals(struct damon_ctx *c)
> > damon_set_attrs(c, &new_attrs);
> > }
> >
> > -static bool __damos_valid_target(struct damon_region *r, struct damos *s)
> > +static bool __damos_valid_target(struct damon_region *r, struct damos *s,
> > + struct damon_ctx *c)
> > {
> > unsigned long sz;
> > - unsigned int nr_accesses = r->nr_accesses_bp / 10000;
> > + unsigned int nr_accesses = damon_nr_accesses_mvsum(r, c);
>
> [Severity: High]
> Could this lead to double-counting access scores if the context attributes
> are updated asynchronously?
>
> In kdamond_fn(), when an aggregation interval finishes, pending API requests
> are processed via kdamond_call(ctx, false) right before
> kdamond_apply_schemes() is called. If a processed request triggers
> damon_set_attrs() (e.g., via sysfs), ctx->next_aggregation_sis is eagerly
> advanced to the end of the newly configured interval.
>
> When __damos_valid_target() subsequently calls damon_nr_accesses_mvsum(),
> it calculates the time window based on ctx->next_aggregation_sis:
>
> mm/damon/core.c:damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() {
> left_window = ctx->next_aggregation_sis - ctx->passed_sample_intervals;
> left_window_bp = mult_frac(left_window, 10000, window_len);
> return damon_mvsum(r->nr_accesses, r->last_nr_accesses, left_window_bp);
> }
>
> Because ctx->next_aggregation_sis was just advanced, left_window equals the
> full new window length, resulting in a left_window_bp of 10000.
>
> Since damon_mvsum() assumes it is at the start of the window, it will add
> the unscaled r->last_nr_accesses to the current r->nr_accesses. Because the
> aggregation interval just finished, r->nr_accesses already holds the
> fully-accumulated access count. Adding last_nr_accesses effectively doubles
> the access score and could misclassify regions during target validation.
>
> The pre-patch code avoided this by safely reading the decoupled
> r->nr_accesses_bp, which preserved the correct scaled value across
> kdamond_call() boundary transitions.
Nice finding. This should be a minor impact that persists for only one
aggregation interval, but I think the issue is bettter to not introduced. I
will scale r->last_nr_accesses together to avoid this issue in the next
revision.
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-20 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-20 17:22 [RFC PATCH v1.1 00/13] mm/damon: optimize out nr_accesses_bp SeongJae Park
2026-06-20 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 01/13] mm/damon: introduce damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() SeongJae Park
2026-06-20 17:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 17:39 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-20 17:41 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-20 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 02/13] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test damon_mvsum() SeongJae Park
2026-06-20 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 03/13] mm/damon/core: use damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() in __damos_valid_target() SeongJae Park
2026-06-20 17:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 18:07 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2026-06-20 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 04/13] mm/damon/core: use damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() for damos region tracing SeongJae Park
2026-06-20 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 05/13] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: use damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() for damo regions SeongJae Park
2026-06-20 17:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 18:19 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-20 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 06/13] mm/damon/core: remove damon_warn_fix_nr_accesses_corruption() SeongJae Park
2026-06-20 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 07/13] mm/damon/core: remove damon_verify_reset_aggregated() SeongJae Park
2026-06-20 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 08/13] mm/damon/core: remove damon_verify_merge_regions_of() SeongJae Park
2026-06-20 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 09/13] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: remove nr_accesses_bp setup and tests SeongJae Park
2026-06-20 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 10/13] selftests/damon/drgn_dump_damon_status: do not dump nr_accesses_bp SeongJae Park
2026-06-20 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 11/13] mm/damon/core: remove nr_accesses_bp setups and updates SeongJae Park
2026-06-20 17:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 17:45 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-20 18:20 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-20 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 12/13] mm/damon/core: remove damon_moving_sum() and its unit test SeongJae Park
2026-06-20 17:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 17:47 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-20 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 13/13] mm/damon: remove damon_region->nr_accesses_bp SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260620180720.93325-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox