From: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
To: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@linux.dev>,
Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
David Gow <davidgow@davidgow.net>,
damon@lists.linux.dev, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test damon_nr_samples_per_aggr()
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 23:49:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902154944.4035059-1-kunwu.chan@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902151955.88892-1-sj@kernel.org>
On Wed, 2 Sep 2026 08:19:54 -0700 SJ Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2026 23:08:41 +0800 Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 22:47:42 -0700 SJ Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
> [...]
> > Both `sample_interval` and `aggr_interval` are zero here. Since
> > `sample_interval` is the denominator in `damon_nr_samples_per_aggr()`,
> > would it be better to keep `aggr_interval` non-zero when testing the
> > zero `sample_interval` case?
> >
> > This would make the test explicitly cover the divide-by-zero protection.
> > If the `aggr_interval == 0` behavior is also worth covering, perhaps it
> > could be tested separately.
>
> Thank you for your review and question, Kunwu!
>
> Yes, that kind of additional test case would be nice. Please feel free to post
> a patch if you'd like to! :) And no pressure, no rush. I will also consider
> doing it myself if it seems you are not interested.
Thanks for the feedback, SJ!
I will prepare a small follow-up patch for this test
clarity improvement.
Reviewed-by: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
Thanks,
Kunwu
>
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
>
> [...]
>
Sent using hkml (https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 5:47 [PATCH 00/12] mm/damon: cleanup code, add test cases, and update guidances in docs SJ Park
2026-09-02 5:47 ` [PATCH 01/12] mm/damon/core: use damon_nr_samples_per_aggr() for max merge threshold SJ Park
2026-09-02 5:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 2:00 ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-02 5:47 ` [PATCH 02/12] mm/damon/core: remove debug messages SJ Park
2026-09-02 5:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 6:11 ` SJ Park
2026-09-02 6:14 ` SJ Park
2026-09-02 5:47 ` [PATCH 03/12] mm/damon/vaddr: remove a debug message SJ Park
2026-09-02 5:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 2:24 ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-02 5:47 ` [PATCH 04/12] mm/damon/core: validate number of probes in valid_probe_params() SJ Park
2026-09-02 6:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 15:32 ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-02 5:47 ` [PATCH 05/12] mm/damon/sysfs: remove probes number validation SJ Park
2026-09-02 5:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:07 ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-02 14:37 ` SJ Park
2026-09-02 15:33 ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-02 5:47 ` [PATCH 06/12] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: extend set_regions() test for error case SJ Park
2026-09-02 5:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 5:47 ` [PATCH 07/12] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test <=0 size damon_set_regions() inputs SJ Park
2026-09-02 5:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 5:47 ` [PATCH 08/12] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test overlapping ranges for set_regions() SJ Park
2026-09-02 5:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 3:04 ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-02 5:47 ` [PATCH 09/12] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test damon_nr_samples_per_aggr() SJ Park
2026-09-02 5:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 15:08 ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-02 15:19 ` SJ Park
2026-09-02 15:49 ` Kunwu Chan [this message]
2026-09-03 0:22 ` SJ Park
2026-09-02 5:47 ` [PATCH 10/12] selftests/damon/sysfs.sh: test hugepage_mem_bp quota goal SJ Park
2026-09-02 5:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 3:06 ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-02 5:47 ` [PATCH 11/12] Docs/mm/damon/maintainer-profile: update AI review for Sashiko replies SJ Park
2026-09-02 5:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 5:47 ` [PATCH 12/12] Docs/ABI/damon: recommend subsystem doc instead of admin-guide SJ Park
2026-09-02 5:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 3:09 ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-02 6:16 ` [PATCH 00/12] mm/damon: cleanup code, add test cases, and update guidances in docs SJ Park
2026-09-02 22:42 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902154944.4035059-1-kunwu.chan@linux.dev \
--to=kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=davidgow@davidgow.net \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kunwu.chan@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox