Linux Device Mapper development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Bryn Reeves <breeves@redhat.com>,
	"Stewart, Sean" <Sean.Stewart@netapp.com>,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: dm-multipath: Accept failed paths for multipath maps
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:05:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53CCADBC.50503@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140718161550.GB5598@redhat.com>

On 07/18/2014 06:15 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18 2014 at 12:04pm -0400,
> Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 18 2014 at  2:00am -0400,
>> Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Will be sending some update once the testing is done.
>>
>> OK.  The stronger case that can be made for the stability of this change
>> (no missing checks for dev->bdev, etc) the better.
>>
>> I did just do some basic testing, of both dm-mpath and dm-thinp, seems
>> fine.  The DM core changes really are simple (just some extra negative
>> checks that won't ever apply for the normal case -- where "normal case"
>> is DM targets that use dm_get_device rather than __dm_get_device, and
>> had to add a dev_t to struct dm_dev).
>
> BTW, I noticed one thing that I didn't think of as logical fallout, but
> it makes sense: if configure multipthd to not use find_multipaths then
> multipathd will successfully push down an mpath table that covers the
> system disk (sda) -- but mpatha isn't able to dm_get_device:
>
> # lsblk /dev/sda /dev/mapper/mpatha
> NAME                            MAJ:MIN RM   SIZE RO TYPE  MOUNTPOINT
> sda                               8:0    0 930.5G  0 disk
> ├─sda1                            8:1    0   500M  0 part  /boot
> └─sda2                            8:2    0   930G  0 part
>    ├─rhel_rhel--storage--02-swap 253:0    0     4G  0 lvm   [SWAP]
>    └─rhel_rhel--storage--02-root 253:1    0   350G  0 lvm   /
> mpatha                          253:6    0 930.5G  0 mpath
>
> # multipath -ll mpatha
> mpatha (36003005700ec189015d42b92237a76d1) dm-6 LSI     ,RAID 5/6 SAS 6G
> size=930G features='0' hwhandler='0' wp=rw
> `-+- policy='service-time 0' prio=1 status=enabled
>    `- 0:2:0:0 sda  8:0   failed ready running
>
> And multipathd keeps failing to reinstate_path:
> ...
> [ 1906.647322] device-mapper: multipath: message: error getting device 8:0
> [ 1912.652652] device-mapper: multipath: message: error getting device 8:0
> [ 1918.657949] device-mapper: multipath: message: error getting device 8:0
> [ 1924.664118] device-mapper: multipath: message: error getting device 8:0
> [ 1930.669635] device-mapper: multipath: message: error getting device 8:0
>
> Again, this all makes sense... but certainly shows that blacklisting the
> relevant devices is a must.
>
Precisely.
We have been taking the approach that starting multipath will 
attempt to take over _any_ (eligible) device.
So this error would constitute a misconfiguration from our POV.
Either the device needs to be blacklisted or the process accessing 
the device needs to be reconfigured to use multipathing.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-21  6:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-18  7:52 [PATCHv2] dm-multipath: Accept failed paths for multipath maps Hannes Reinecke
2013-12-18 14:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-12-18 14:25   ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-12-18 15:28     ` Stewart, Sean
2013-12-19  8:21       ` Bart Van Assche
2014-02-19  1:14         ` Mike Snitzer
2014-02-19  8:11           ` Bart Van Assche
2014-07-18  0:04       ` Mike Snitzer
2014-07-18  0:23         ` Mike Snitzer
2014-07-18  6:00           ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-07-18 16:04             ` Mike Snitzer
2014-07-18 16:15               ` Mike Snitzer
2014-07-21  6:05                 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2014-07-18  0:29         ` John Utz
2014-07-18  2:18           ` Mike Snitzer
2014-07-18  3:31             ` John Utz
2014-07-18  5:57               ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-07-18 14:38                 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-07-18 17:04                   ` John Utz
2014-07-21 14:23                     ` ZAC target (Was: Re: dm-multipath: Accept failed paths for multipath maps) Hannes Reinecke
2014-07-21 19:28                       ` Kent Overstreet
2014-07-22  5:46                         ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-07-22  8:08                           ` Matias Bjorling
2014-07-18 16:51                 ` dm-multipath: Accept failed paths for multipath maps John Utz
2014-07-18  6:12         ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-12-18 15:28     ` Merla, ShivaKrishna

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53CCADBC.50503@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=Sean.Stewart@netapp.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=breeves@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox