* Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: dw-edma: Fix linked list physical address calculation on non-64 bits architectures
2020-08-13 14:13 [PATCH] dmaengine: dw-edma: Fix linked list physical address calculation on non-64 bits architectures Gustavo Pimentel
@ 2020-08-13 17:07 ` kernel test robot
2020-08-25 11:09 ` Vinod Koul
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2020-08-13 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gustavo Pimentel, vkoul, dmaengine
Cc: kbuild-all, Gustavo Pimentel, Joao Pinto, stable
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8377 bytes --]
Hi Gustavo,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on vkoul-dmaengine/next]
[also build test WARNING on v5.8 next-20200813]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Gustavo-Pimentel/dmaengine-dw-edma-Fix-linked-list-physical-address-calculation-on-non-64-bits-architectures/20200813-221607
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vkoul/dmaengine.git next
config: x86_64-randconfig-m001-20200811 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
smatch warnings:
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c:233 dw_edma_v0_core_write_chunk() warn: inconsistent indenting
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c:266 dw_edma_v0_core_start() warn: inconsistent indenting
vim +233 drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 191
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 192 static void dw_edma_v0_core_write_chunk(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk)
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 193 {
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 194 struct dw_edma_burst *child;
756c3ef93492af Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 195 struct dw_edma_v0_lli __iomem *lli;
756c3ef93492af Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 196 struct dw_edma_v0_llp __iomem *llp;
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 197 u32 control = 0, i = 0;
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 198 int j;
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 199
756c3ef93492af Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 200 lli = chunk->ll_region.vaddr;
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 201
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 202 if (chunk->cb)
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 203 control = DW_EDMA_V0_CB;
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 204
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 205 j = chunk->bursts_alloc;
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 206 list_for_each_entry(child, &chunk->burst->list, list) {
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 207 j--;
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 208 if (!j)
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 209 control |= (DW_EDMA_V0_LIE | DW_EDMA_V0_RIE);
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 210
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 211 /* Channel control */
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 212 SET_LL(&lli[i].control, control);
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 213 /* Transfer size */
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 214 SET_LL(&lli[i].transfer_size, child->sz);
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 215 /* SAR - low, high */
6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 216 SET_LL(&lli[i].sar_low, lower_32_bits(child->sar));
6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 217 SET_LL(&lli[i].sar_high, upper_32_bits(child->sar));
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 218 /* DAR - low, high */
6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 219 SET_LL(&lli[i].dar_low, lower_32_bits(child->dar));
6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 220 SET_LL(&lli[i].dar_high, upper_32_bits(child->dar));
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 221 i++;
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 222 }
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 223
756c3ef93492af Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 224 llp = (void __iomem *)&lli[i];
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 225 control = DW_EDMA_V0_LLP | DW_EDMA_V0_TCB;
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 226 if (!chunk->cb)
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 227 control |= DW_EDMA_V0_CB;
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 228
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 229 /* Channel control */
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 230 SET_LL(&llp->control, control);
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 231 /* Linked list - low, high */
c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 232 #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 @233 SET_LL(&llp->llp_low, lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr));
6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 234 SET_LL(&llp->llp_high, upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr));
c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 235 #else /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT */
c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 236 SET_LL(&llp->llp_low, chunk->ll_region.paddr);
c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 237 SET_LL(&llp->llp_high, 0x0);
c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 238 #endif /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT */
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 239 }
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 240
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 241 void dw_edma_v0_core_start(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk, bool first)
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 242 {
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 243 struct dw_edma_chan *chan = chunk->chan;
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 244 struct dw_edma *dw = chan->chip->dw;
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 245 u32 tmp;
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 246
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 247 dw_edma_v0_core_write_chunk(chunk);
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 248
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 249 if (first) {
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 250 /* Enable engine */
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 251 SET_RW(dw, chan->dir, engine_en, BIT(0));
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 252 /* Interrupt unmask - done, abort */
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 253 tmp = GET_RW(dw, chan->dir, int_mask);
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 254 tmp &= ~FIELD_PREP(EDMA_V0_DONE_INT_MASK, BIT(chan->id));
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 255 tmp &= ~FIELD_PREP(EDMA_V0_ABORT_INT_MASK, BIT(chan->id));
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 256 SET_RW(dw, chan->dir, int_mask, tmp);
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 257 /* Linked list error */
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 258 tmp = GET_RW(dw, chan->dir, linked_list_err_en);
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 259 tmp |= FIELD_PREP(EDMA_V0_LINKED_LIST_ERR_MASK, BIT(chan->id));
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 260 SET_RW(dw, chan->dir, linked_list_err_en, tmp);
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 261 /* Channel control */
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 262 SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, ch_control1,
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 263 (DW_EDMA_V0_CCS | DW_EDMA_V0_LLE));
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 264 /* Linked list - low, high */
c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 265 #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 @266 SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_low,
6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 267 lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr));
6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 268 SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_high,
6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 269 upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr));
c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 270 #else /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT */
c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 271 SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_low,
c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 272 chunk->ll_region.paddr);
c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 273 SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_high, 0x0);
c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 274 #endif /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT*/
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 275 }
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 276 /* Doorbell */
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 277 SET_RW(dw, chan->dir, doorbell,
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 278 FIELD_PREP(EDMA_V0_DOORBELL_CH_MASK, chan->id));
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 279 }
7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 280
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 39302 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: dw-edma: Fix linked list physical address calculation on non-64 bits architectures
2020-08-13 14:13 [PATCH] dmaengine: dw-edma: Fix linked list physical address calculation on non-64 bits architectures Gustavo Pimentel
2020-08-13 17:07 ` kernel test robot
@ 2020-08-25 11:09 ` Vinod Koul
2020-08-26 12:31 ` Gustavo Pimentel
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vinod Koul @ 2020-08-25 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gustavo Pimentel; +Cc: dmaengine, Joao Pinto, stable
On 13-08-20, 16:13, Gustavo Pimentel wrote:
> Fix linked list physical address calculation on non-64 bits architectures.
>
> The paddr variable is phys_addr_t type, which can assume a different
> type (u64 or u32) depending on the conditional compilation flag
> CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT.
>
> Since this variable is used in with upper_32 bits() macro to get the
> value from 32 to 63 bits, on a non-64 bits architecture this variable
> will assume a u32 type, it can cause a compilation warning.
>
> This issue was reported by a Coverity analysis.
>
> Fixes: 7e4b8a4fbe2c ("dmaengine: Add Synopsys eDMA IP version 0 support")
>
> Cc: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c
> index 692de47..cfabbf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c
> @@ -229,8 +229,13 @@ static void dw_edma_v0_core_write_chunk(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk)
> /* Channel control */
> SET_LL(&llp->control, control);
> /* Linked list - low, high */
> - SET_LL(&llp->llp_low, lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr));
> - SET_LL(&llp->llp_high, upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr));
> + #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
> + SET_LL(&llp->llp_low, lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr));
> + SET_LL(&llp->llp_high, upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr));
> + #else /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT */
> + SET_LL(&llp->llp_low, chunk->ll_region.paddr);
> + SET_LL(&llp->llp_high, 0x0);
Shouldn't upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr) return zero for non
64bit archs?
> + #endif /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT */
> }
>
> void dw_edma_v0_core_start(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk, bool first)
> @@ -257,10 +262,16 @@ void dw_edma_v0_core_start(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk, bool first)
> SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, ch_control1,
> (DW_EDMA_V0_CCS | DW_EDMA_V0_LLE));
> /* Linked list - low, high */
> - SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_low,
> - lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr));
> - SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_high,
> - upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr));
> + #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
> + SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_low,
> + lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr));
> + SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_high,
> + upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr));
> + #else /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT */
> + SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_low,
> + chunk->ll_region.paddr);
> + SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_high, 0x0);
> + #endif /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT*/
> }
> /* Doorbell */
> SET_RW(dw, chan->dir, doorbell,
> --
> 2.7.4
--
~Vinod
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread