From: "Verma, Devendra" <devverma@amd.com>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: mani@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, frank.li@kernel.org,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michal.simek@amd.com,
Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>,
devverma@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dmaengine: dw-edma: Make Xilinx Macros Dev Name Agnostic
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 17:53:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21d1c6d1-c84e-4351-aa30-dc49ca3b5ef1@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <amI09ZcfhX4SEPIH@SMW015318>
On 23-Jul-26 21:06, Frank Li wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 03:53:13PM +0530, Verma, Devendra wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 22-Jul-26 20:21, Frank Li wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 04:46:38PM +0530, Devendra K Verma wrote:
>>>> Xilinx specific macros for MDB device can be reused for the
>>>> Xilinx supported other similar IP such as CPM6.
>>>> Renamed the Xilinx specific macros in a way that can be
>>>> reused for Xilinx supported upcoming IP, CPM6.
>>>> Naming is in accordance with the naming done for Synopsys macros.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Devendra K Verma <devverma@amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> I don't think it is necessary to remove MDB. You may mention somewhere
>>> CMP6 compatible with MDB. It is quite common in driver.
>>>
>>> The major concerns is that if a incompatible devices appear, such as CMP7,
>>> which have special registers, need add _MDB_ back.
>>>
>>> Frank
>>>
>>
>> The MDB was used cause at that time only Xilinx MDB was the IP to go
>> public.
>> I agree with your suggestion but the idea used here is that, for the
>> common functionalities use the names which are affiliated to vendor
>> that is Xilinx and can be used across the IP having the similarity.
>> In case specific functionality is required for MDB or CPM6 then
>> it can be associated using vendor + device name, that way it is easy
>> to identify which ones are common and specific to the IP.
>>
>> Currently, if any functionality added for MDB ONLY then it would be
>> assumed to be supported on Xilinx CPM6 as well.
>
> Rename when this case really appear.
OK, I take this suggestion. The channel separation is supported for
CPM6 so the specific macro will be associated with Vendor + Device
name. The rest of the macros could remain generic.
The macro name was kept generic cause the ch_sep_sz for the other
Xilinx devices will always be 0 (256B).
-Devendra
>
> Frank
>
>> To remove the confusion
>> extra comment would be required to inform which functionality is
>> supported for which IP. That is why the removal of MDB appoach was taken
>> to reduce the confusion and work. The first approach looked clean.
>>
>> Please let me know your thougths.
>>
>> -Devendra
>>
>>>> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c | 58 +++++++++++++++---------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
>>>> index 791c46e8ae4c..ec5e057a0f11 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
>>>> @@ -29,21 +29,21 @@
>>>> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_XILINX_B054 0xb054
>>>> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_XILINX_B00F 0xb00f
>>>>
>>>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_ID 0x6
>>>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_ID 0x20
>>>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_BAR GENMASK(10, 8)
>>>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_MAP GENMASK(2, 0)
>>>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_WR_CH GENMASK(9, 0)
>>>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_RD_CH GENMASK(25, 16)
>>>> -
>>>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_DEVMEM_OFF_REG_HIGH 0xc
>>>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_DEVMEM_OFF_REG_LOW 0x8
>>>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_INVALID_ADDR (~0ULL)
>>>> -
>>>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_LL_OFF_GAP 0x200000
>>>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_LL_SIZE 0x800
>>>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_DT_OFF_GAP 0x100000
>>>> -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_DT_SIZE 0x800
>>>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_ID 0x6
>>>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_ID 0x20
>>>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_BAR GENMASK(10, 8)
>>>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_MAP GENMASK(2, 0)
>>>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_WR_CH GENMASK(9, 0)
>>>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_RD_CH GENMASK(25, 16)
>>>> +
>>>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_DEVMEM_OFF_REG_HIGH 0xc
>>>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_DEVMEM_OFF_REG_LOW 0x8
>>>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_INVALID_ADDR (~0ULL)
>>>> +
>>>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_LL_OFF_GAP 0x200000
>>>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_LL_SIZE 0x800
>>>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_DT_OFF_GAP 0x100000
>>>> +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_DT_SIZE 0x800
>>>>
>>>> #define DW_BLOCK(a, b, c) \
>>>> { \
>>>> @@ -258,10 +258,10 @@ static void dw_edma_pcie_get_xilinx_dma_data(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>>> u16 vsec;
>>>> u64 off;
>>>>
>>>> - pdata->devmem_phys_off = DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_INVALID_ADDR;
>>>> + pdata->devmem_phys_off = DW_PCIE_XILINX_INVALID_ADDR;
>>>>
>>>> vsec = pci_find_vsec_capability(pdev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_XILINX,
>>>> - DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_ID);
>>>> + DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_ID);
>>>> if (!vsec)
>>>> return;
>>>>
>>>> @@ -272,18 +272,18 @@ static void dw_edma_pcie_get_xilinx_dma_data(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>>>
>>>> pci_dbg(pdev, "Detected Xilinx PCIe Vendor-Specific Extended Capability DMA\n");
>>>> pci_read_config_dword(pdev, vsec + 0x8, &val);
>>>> - map = FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_MAP, val);
>>>> + map = FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_MAP, val);
>>>> if (map != EDMA_MF_HDMA_NATIVE)
>>>> return;
>>>>
>>>> pdata->mf = map;
>>>> - pdata->rg.bar = FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_BAR, val);
>>>> + pdata->rg.bar = FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_BAR, val);
>>>>
>>>> pci_read_config_dword(pdev, vsec + 0xc, &val);
>>>> pdata->wr_ch_cnt = min(pdata->wr_ch_cnt,
>>>> - FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_WR_CH, val));
>>>> + FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_WR_CH, val));
>>>> pdata->rd_ch_cnt = min(pdata->rd_ch_cnt,
>>>> - FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_RD_CH, val));
>>>> + FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_DMA_RD_CH, val));
>>>>
>>>> pci_read_config_dword(pdev, vsec + 0x14, &val);
>>>> off = val;
>>>> @@ -293,16 +293,16 @@ static void dw_edma_pcie_get_xilinx_dma_data(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>>> pdata->rg.off = off;
>>>>
>>>> vsec = pci_find_vsec_capability(pdev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_XILINX,
>>>> - DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_ID);
>>>> + DW_PCIE_XILINX_VSEC_ID);
>>>> if (!vsec)
>>>> return;
>>>>
>>>> pci_read_config_dword(pdev,
>>>> - vsec + DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_DEVMEM_OFF_REG_HIGH,
>>>> + vsec + DW_PCIE_XILINX_DEVMEM_OFF_REG_HIGH,
>>>> &val);
>>>> off = val;
>>>> pci_read_config_dword(pdev,
>>>> - vsec + DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_DEVMEM_OFF_REG_LOW,
>>>> + vsec + DW_PCIE_XILINX_DEVMEM_OFF_REG_LOW,
>>>> &val);
>>>> off <<= 32;
>>>> off |= val;
>>>> @@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>>> * address use the non-LL mode or simple mode supported by
>>>> * the HDMA IP.
>>>> */
>>>> - if (vsec_data->devmem_phys_off == DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_INVALID_ADDR)
>>>> + if (vsec_data->devmem_phys_off == DW_PCIE_XILINX_INVALID_ADDR)
>>>> non_ll = true;
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> @@ -370,10 +370,10 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>>> */
>>>> if (!non_ll)
>>>> dw_edma_set_chan_region_offset(vsec_data, BAR_2, 0,
>>>> - DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_LL_OFF_GAP,
>>>> - DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_LL_SIZE,
>>>> - DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_DT_OFF_GAP,
>>>> - DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_DT_SIZE);
>>>> + DW_PCIE_XILINX_LL_OFF_GAP,
>>>> + DW_PCIE_XILINX_LL_SIZE,
>>>> + DW_PCIE_XILINX_DT_OFF_GAP,
>>>> + DW_PCIE_XILINX_DT_SIZE);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /* Mapping PCI BAR regions */
>>>> --
>>>> 2.43.0
>>>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-27 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-22 11:16 [PATCH v1 0/3] CPM6 Channel Separation Support Devendra K Verma
2026-07-22 11:16 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] dmaengine: dw-edma: Make Xilinx Macros Dev Name Agnostic Devendra K Verma
2026-07-22 11:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 14:51 ` Frank Li
2026-07-23 10:23 ` Verma, Devendra
2026-07-23 15:36 ` Frank Li
2026-07-27 12:23 ` Verma, Devendra [this message]
2026-07-22 11:16 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable Chan Separation via VSEC Devendra K Verma
2026-07-22 11:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 15:00 ` Frank Li
2026-07-23 10:19 ` Verma, Devendra
2026-07-22 11:16 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add changes to support Channel Separation Devendra K Verma
2026-07-22 11:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 15:22 ` Frank Li
2026-07-23 10:26 ` Verma, Devendra
2026-07-23 15:28 ` Frank Li
2026-07-27 12:18 ` Verma, Devendra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21d1c6d1-c84e-4351-aa30-dc49ca3b5ef1@amd.com \
--to=devverma@amd.com \
--cc=Frank.li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frank.li@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox