From: "Verma, Devendra" <devverma@amd.com>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: mani@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, frank.li@kernel.org,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michal.simek@amd.com,
Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>,
devverma@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add changes to support Channel Separation
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 17:48:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af3da652-6825-4e27-ae8f-1f97080c6690@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <amIzIV5-p8_IgE2k@SMW015318>
On 23-Jul-26 20:58, Frank Li wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 03:56:33PM +0530, Verma, Devendra wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 22-Jul-26 20:52, Frank Li wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 04:46:40PM +0530, Devendra K Verma wrote:
>>>
>>> Add Koichiro Den, who did many work with this edma driver recently
>>>
>>
>> Sure, thanks!
>>
>>>> Following changes are made:
>>>> o In 'struct dw_hdma_v0_ch_regs', it is assumed the channel
>>>> separation as 256-bytes which is default, but if an IP is
>>>
>>> channel register space size?
>>>
>>>> configured for a different size of channel separation then
>>>> user can retrieve it using the supported VSEC (0x6).
>>>> Modified the struct to work with the channel separation
>>>> supported by IP.
>>>> CPM6 supports channel separation, default is 512.
>>>
>>>
>>>> o Changes in macros / functions where address of the channel
>>>> is accessed based on channel index and direction. It enables
>>>> the calculation of the channel reg base address based on
>>>> the selected channel separation.
>>>> o Struct removed - dw_hdma_v0_ch, dw_hdma_v0_regs
>>>> o Functions removed - __dw_regs()
>>>
>>> Can you summary change and purpose? such as
>>>
>>> Support difference channel register space size for difference IP. Previous
>>> use fix default value 256, CMP6 support difference register space size,
>>> which default value is 512.
>>>
>>> Update channel register base address caluator method by use ch_space_sze
>>> and remove unused dw_hdma_v0_ch, dw_hdma_v0_regs.
>>>
>>> You can rephrase.
>>>
>>
>> Sure, I will rephrase this. Thank you for the suggestion!
>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Devendra K Verma <devverma@amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c | 4 ++++
>>>> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
>>>> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-debugfs.c | 17 ++++++-----------
>>>> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h | 10 ----------
>>>> include/linux/dma/edma.h | 1 +
>>>> 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
>>>> index 6295d01ba2f7..ca2a4be2f3a5 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
>>>> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ static const struct dw_edma_pcie_data snps_edda_data = {
>>>> .irqs = 1,
>>>> .wr_ch_cnt = 2,
>>>> .rd_ch_cnt = 2,
>>>> + .ch_sep_sz = 256,
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> static const struct dw_edma_pcie_data xilinx_mdb_data = {
>>>> @@ -126,6 +127,7 @@ static const struct dw_edma_pcie_data xilinx_mdb_data = {
>>>> .irqs = 1,
>>>> .wr_ch_cnt = 8,
>>>> .rd_ch_cnt = 8,
>>>> + .ch_sep_sz = 256,
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> static const struct dw_edma_pcie_data xilinx_cpm6_dma_data = {
>>>> @@ -139,6 +141,7 @@ static const struct dw_edma_pcie_data xilinx_cpm6_dma_data = {
>>>> .irqs = 1,
>>>> .wr_ch_cnt = 8,
>>>> .rd_ch_cnt = 8,
>>>> + .ch_sep_sz = 512,
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> static void dw_edma_set_chan_region_offset(struct dw_edma_pcie_data *pdata,
>>>> @@ -443,6 +446,7 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>>> chip->nr_irqs = nr_irqs;
>>>> chip->ops = &dw_edma_pcie_plat_ops;
>>>> chip->cfg_non_ll = non_ll;
>>>> + chip->ch_sep_sz = vsec_data->ch_sep_sz;
>>>
>>>
>>> This blocks PCI endpoint DMA, this driver is not only used by this.
>>> EPC controller will not set this value, so ch_sep_sz will be 0 for EPC
>>> controller.
>>>
>>> Frank
>>>
>>
>> The EPC driver is using the chip->reg_base + reg_offset for computing
>> the final addresse and not using the register mappings. If the
>> reg_offset are correct then this ch_sep_sz change will not affect the
>> EPC driver.
>
> show me, how work, both use below method to get channel register address
>
> __dw_ch_regs () {
> return dw->chip->reg_base + (ch_base * dw->chip->ch_sep_sz)
> }
>
Yes, the dw_edma_probe() gets called in the EPC driver, I had checked
based on the dw_pcie->edma.reg_base. The ch_sep_sz is required.
I have added the ch_sep_sz as part of dw_pcie_edma_init_data().
Thanks for the suggestion.
-Devendra
> Frank
>
>>
>>>>
>>>> chip->ll_wr_cnt = vsec_data->wr_ch_cnt;
>>>> chip->ll_rd_cnt = vsec_data->rd_ch_cnt;
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
>>>> index 632abb8b481c..3f27a93c4d8c 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
>>>> @@ -23,18 +23,23 @@ enum dw_hdma_control {
>>>> DW_HDMA_V0_LLE = BIT(9),
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> -static inline struct dw_hdma_v0_regs __iomem *__dw_regs(struct dw_edma *dw)
>>>> -{
>>>> - return dw->chip->reg_base;
>>>> -}
>>>> -
>>>> static inline struct dw_hdma_v0_ch_regs __iomem *
>>>> __dw_ch_regs(struct dw_edma *dw, enum dw_edma_dir dir, u16 ch)
>>>> {
>>>> - if (dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE)
>>>> - return &(__dw_regs(dw)->ch[ch].wr);
>>>> - else
>>>> - return &(__dw_regs(dw)->ch[ch].rd);
>>>> + u32 ch_base;
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * For Write, the channel register index starts at
>>>> + * wr_base(ch_idx) = (2 * ch_idx) * ch_sep_sz
>>>> + *
>>>> + * For Read channel,
>>>> + * rd_base(ch_idx) = (2 * ch_idx + 1) * ch_sep_sz
>>>> + */
>>>> + ch_base = 2 * ch;
>>>> + if (dir == EDMA_DIR_READ)
>>>> + ch_base += 1;
>>>> +
>>>> + return dw->chip->reg_base + (ch_base * dw->chip->ch_sep_sz);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> #define SET_CH_32(dw, dir, ch, name, value) \
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-debugfs.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-debugfs.c
>>>> index dcdc57fe976c..33128685bbd9 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-debugfs.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-debugfs.c
>>>> @@ -13,22 +13,17 @@
>>>> #include "dw-hdma-v0-regs.h"
>>>> #include "dw-edma-core.h"
>>>>
>>>> -#define REGS_ADDR(dw, name) \
>>>> - ({ \
>>>> - struct dw_hdma_v0_regs __iomem *__regs = (dw)->chip->reg_base; \
>>>> - \
>>>> - (void __iomem *)&__regs->name; \
>>>> - })
>>>> -
>>>> #define REGS_CH_ADDR(dw, name, _dir, _ch) \
>>>> ({ \
>>>> - struct dw_hdma_v0_ch_regs __iomem *__ch_regs; \
>>>> + struct dw_hdma_v0_ch_regs __iomem *__ch_regs; \
>>>> + off_t __off = (dw)->chip->ch_sep_sz; \
>>>> \
>>>> - if (_dir == EDMA_DIR_READ) \
>>>> - __ch_regs = REGS_ADDR(dw, ch[_ch].rd); \
>>>> + if ((_dir) == EDMA_DIR_READ) \
>>>> + __off *= (2 * (_ch) + 1); \
>>>> else \
>>>> - __ch_regs = REGS_ADDR(dw, ch[_ch].wr); \
>>>> + __off *= (2 * (_ch)); \
>>>> \
>>>> + __ch_regs = ((dw)->chip->reg_base + __off); \
>>>> (void __iomem *)&__ch_regs->name; \
>>>> })
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h
>>>> index 7759ba9b4850..2475b8d96133 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h
>>>> @@ -84,16 +84,6 @@ struct dw_hdma_v0_ch_regs {
>>>> };
>>>> } msi_abort;
>>>> u32 msi_msgdata; /* 0x00a8 */
>>>> - u32 padding_2[21]; /* 0x00ac..0x00fc */
>>>> -} __packed;
>>>> -
>>>> -struct dw_hdma_v0_ch {
>>>> - struct dw_hdma_v0_ch_regs wr; /* 0x0000 */
>>>> - struct dw_hdma_v0_ch_regs rd; /* 0x0100 */
>>>> -} __packed;
>>>> -
>>>> -struct dw_hdma_v0_regs {
>>>> - struct dw_hdma_v0_ch ch[HDMA_V0_MAX_NR_CH]; /* 0x0000..0x0fa8 */
>>>> } __packed;
>>>>
>>>> struct dw_hdma_v0_lli {
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma/edma.h b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
>>>> index 1fafd5b0e315..a6c5728f03d3 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/dma/edma.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
>>>> @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ struct dw_edma_chip {
>>>>
>>>> struct dw_edma *dw;
>>>> bool cfg_non_ll;
>>>> + u32 ch_sep_sz;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> /* Export to the platform drivers */
>>>> --
>>>> 2.43.0
>>>>
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-27 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-22 11:16 [PATCH v1 0/3] CPM6 Channel Separation Support Devendra K Verma
2026-07-22 11:16 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] dmaengine: dw-edma: Make Xilinx Macros Dev Name Agnostic Devendra K Verma
2026-07-22 11:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 14:51 ` Frank Li
2026-07-23 10:23 ` Verma, Devendra
2026-07-23 15:36 ` Frank Li
2026-07-27 12:23 ` Verma, Devendra
2026-07-22 11:16 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable Chan Separation via VSEC Devendra K Verma
2026-07-22 11:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 15:00 ` Frank Li
2026-07-23 10:19 ` Verma, Devendra
2026-07-22 11:16 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add changes to support Channel Separation Devendra K Verma
2026-07-22 11:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 15:22 ` Frank Li
2026-07-23 10:26 ` Verma, Devendra
2026-07-23 15:28 ` Frank Li
2026-07-27 12:18 ` Verma, Devendra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af3da652-6825-4e27-ae8f-1f97080c6690@amd.com \
--to=devverma@amd.com \
--cc=Frank.li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frank.li@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox