* [PATCH v2] ethdev: fix pointer check in GENEVE and RAW flow copy
@ 2026-05-19 7:23 Denis Lyulin
2026-05-19 14:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Denis Lyulin @ 2026-05-19 7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stephen, Ori Kam, Thomas Monjalon, Andrew Rybchenko, Michael Baum,
Ferruh Yigit
Cc: dev, stable, lyulin.2003, adrien.mazarguil
When rte_flow_conv_item_spec() is called from rte_flow_conv_pattern(),
the spec, last and mask pointers are checked separately. If the API
is used incorrectly, the spec pointer may be NULL while last and mask
may be valid pointers. Also call of rte_flow_conv() with
RTE_FLOW_CONV_OP_ITEM_MASK and item->spec == NULL may lead to the
same problem.
In rte_flow_conv_item_spec() for GENVE_OPT and RAW item types the spec
pointer is used even if the function is called to copy last or mask.
It may cause a NULL pointer (spec) dereference.
This commit adds extra check of item->spec and if it is NULL, does not
copy further data relying on it
Fixes: 841a0445442d ("ethdev: fix GENEVE option item conversion")
Cc: michaelba@nvidia.com
Cc: adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com
Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Denis Lyulin <lyulin.2003@mail.ru>
---
lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
index fe8f43caff..7a51b667cf 100644
--- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
+++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
@@ -672,13 +672,17 @@ rte_flow_conv_item_spec(void *buf, const size_t size,
}),
size > sizeof(*dst.raw) ? sizeof(*dst.raw) : size);
off = sizeof(*dst.raw);
- if (type == RTE_FLOW_CONV_ITEM_SPEC ||
- (type == RTE_FLOW_CONV_ITEM_MASK &&
- ((spec.raw->length & mask.raw->length) >=
- (last.raw->length & mask.raw->length))))
+ if (type == RTE_FLOW_CONV_ITEM_SPEC && spec.raw)
tmp = spec.raw->length & mask.raw->length;
- else
+ else if (type == RTE_FLOW_CONV_ITEM_MASK && spec.raw && last.raw &&
+ ((spec.raw->length & mask.raw->length) >=
+ (last.raw->length & mask.raw->length)))
+ tmp = spec.raw->length & mask.raw->length;
+ else if (last.raw)
tmp = last.raw->length & mask.raw->length;
+ else
+ tmp = 0;
+
if (tmp) {
off = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(off, sizeof(*dst.raw->pattern));
if (size >= off + tmp) {
@@ -696,8 +700,8 @@ rte_flow_conv_item_spec(void *buf, const size_t size,
spec.geneve_opt = item->spec;
src.geneve_opt = data;
dst.geneve_opt = buf;
- tmp = spec.geneve_opt->option_len << 2;
- if (size > 0 && src.geneve_opt->data) {
+ tmp = spec.geneve_opt ? (spec.geneve_opt->option_len << 2) : 0;
+ if (size > 0 && tmp > 0 && src.geneve_opt->data) {
deep_src = (void *)((uintptr_t)(dst.geneve_opt + 1));
dst.geneve_opt->data = rte_memcpy(deep_src,
src.geneve_opt->data,
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] ethdev: fix pointer check in GENEVE and RAW flow copy
2026-05-19 7:23 [PATCH v2] ethdev: fix pointer check in GENEVE and RAW flow copy Denis Lyulin
@ 2026-05-19 14:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-19 14:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2026-05-19 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denis Lyulin
Cc: Ori Kam, Thomas Monjalon, Andrew Rybchenko, Michael Baum,
Ferruh Yigit, dev, stable, adrien.mazarguil
On Tue, 19 May 2026 10:23:35 +0300
Denis Lyulin <lyulin.2003@mail.ru> wrote:
> When rte_flow_conv_item_spec() is called from rte_flow_conv_pattern(),
> the spec, last and mask pointers are checked separately. If the API
> is used incorrectly, the spec pointer may be NULL while last and mask
> may be valid pointers. Also call of rte_flow_conv() with
> RTE_FLOW_CONV_OP_ITEM_MASK and item->spec == NULL may lead to the
> same problem.
>
> In rte_flow_conv_item_spec() for GENVE_OPT and RAW item types the spec
> pointer is used even if the function is called to copy last or mask.
> It may cause a NULL pointer (spec) dereference.
>
> This commit adds extra check of item->spec and if it is NULL, does not
> copy further data relying on it
>
> Fixes: 841a0445442d ("ethdev: fix GENEVE option item conversion")
> Cc: michaelba@nvidia.com
> Cc: adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com
> Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis Lyulin <lyulin.2003@mail.ru>
> ---
Applied to next-net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] ethdev: fix pointer check in GENEVE and RAW flow copy
2026-05-19 14:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2026-05-19 14:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2026-05-19 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denis Lyulin
Cc: Ori Kam, Thomas Monjalon, Andrew Rybchenko, Michael Baum,
Ferruh Yigit, dev, stable, adrien.mazarguil
On Tue, 19 May 2026 10:23:35 +0300
Denis Lyulin <lyulin.2003@mail.ru> wrote:
> When rte_flow_conv_item_spec() is called from rte_flow_conv_pattern(),
> the spec, last and mask pointers are checked separately. If the API
> is used incorrectly, the spec pointer may be NULL while last and mask
> may be valid pointers. Also call of rte_flow_conv() with
> RTE_FLOW_CONV_OP_ITEM_MASK and item->spec == NULL may lead to the
> same problem.
>
> In rte_flow_conv_item_spec() for GENVE_OPT and RAW item types the spec
> pointer is used even if the function is called to copy last or mask.
> It may cause a NULL pointer (spec) dereference.
>
> This commit adds extra check of item->spec and if it is NULL, does not
> copy further data relying on it
>
> Fixes: 841a0445442d ("ethdev: fix GENEVE option item conversion")
> Cc: michaelba@nvidia.com
> Cc: adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com
> Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis Lyulin <lyulin.2003@mail.ru>
> ---
Applied to next-net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-19 15:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-19 7:23 [PATCH v2] ethdev: fix pointer check in GENEVE and RAW flow copy Denis Lyulin
2026-05-19 14:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-19 14:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox