From: Prashant Gupta <prashant.gupta_3@nxp.com>
To: stephen@networkplumber.org, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Jun Yang <jun.yang@nxp.com>, Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4-S1 5/5] mempool/dpaa2: support ops index from primary in secondary
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:51:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260922092158.2340839-6-prashant.gupta_3@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922092158.2340839-1-prashant.gupta_3@nxp.com>
From: Jun Yang <jun.yang@nxp.com>
Secondary processes call rte_dpaa2_mpool_get_ops_idx() but the ops
index is registered only in the primary process. The secondary had no
way to learn the index, causing it to use the initial sentinel value
RTE_MEMPOOL_MAX_OPS_IDX and return an error.
Register an IPC action handler in the primary during pool creation.
Secondary processes send DPAA2_POOL_OPS_IDX_REQ over the
dpaa2_pool_mp_sync channel and receive the ops index back.
Also handle the case where rte_mp_action_register returns ENOTSUP
(e.g. no secondary process support enabled at build time) by
treating it as non-fatal, and improve the error message in
rte_hw_mbuf_free_pool to include the pool name.
Signed-off-by: Jun Yang <jun.yang@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
---
drivers/mempool/dpaa2/dpaa2_hw_mempool.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mempool/dpaa2/dpaa2_hw_mempool.c b/drivers/mempool/dpaa2/dpaa2_hw_mempool.c
index ee001d8ce0..666338fc32 100644
--- a/drivers/mempool/dpaa2/dpaa2_hw_mempool.c
+++ b/drivers/mempool/dpaa2/dpaa2_hw_mempool.c
@@ -34,16 +34,96 @@
#include <dpaax_iova_table.h>
+#define DPAA2_POOL_MP_SYNC "dpaa2_pool_mp_sync"
+#define DPAA2_POOL_OPS_IDX_REQ 0x100
+#define DPAA2_POOL_OPS_IDX_RSP 0x101
+
+static RTE_ATOMIC(int) s_dpaa2_pool_mp_msg_setup;
+
+struct dpaa2_pool_mp_msg {
+ uint16_t msg_type;
+ uint8_t msg_data[];
+};
+
RTE_EXPORT_INTERNAL_SYMBOL(rte_dpaa2_bpid_info)
struct dpaa2_bp_info *rte_dpaa2_bpid_info;
static struct dpaa2_bp_list *h_bp_list;
static int16_t s_dpaa2_pool_ops_idx = RTE_MEMPOOL_MAX_OPS_IDX;
+static int
+dpaa2_mbuf_pool_mp_primary(const struct rte_mp_msg *msg,
+ const void *peer)
+{
+ struct rte_mp_msg reply;
+ const struct dpaa2_pool_mp_msg *req_msg = (const void *)msg->param;
+ struct dpaa2_pool_mp_msg *rsp_msg = (void *)reply.param;
+
+ memset(&reply, 0, sizeof(reply));
+
+ switch (req_msg->msg_type) {
+ case DPAA2_POOL_OPS_IDX_REQ:
+ rsp_msg->msg_type = DPAA2_POOL_OPS_IDX_RSP;
+ memcpy(rsp_msg->msg_data, &s_dpaa2_pool_ops_idx,
+ sizeof(s_dpaa2_pool_ops_idx));
+ reply.len_param = sizeof(struct dpaa2_pool_mp_msg) +
+ sizeof(s_dpaa2_pool_ops_idx);
+ break;
+ default:
+ DPAA2_MEMPOOL_ERR("%s received invalid request(%d)",
+ __func__, req_msg->msg_type);
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+ }
+
+ strlcpy(reply.name, DPAA2_POOL_MP_SYNC, sizeof(reply.name));
+ return rte_mp_reply(&reply, peer);
+}
+
RTE_EXPORT_INTERNAL_SYMBOL(rte_dpaa2_mpool_get_ops_idx)
int rte_dpaa2_mpool_get_ops_idx(void)
{
- return s_dpaa2_pool_ops_idx;
+ struct rte_mp_msg mp_req;
+ struct rte_mp_reply mp_reply;
+ struct timespec ts = {.tv_sec = 5, .tv_nsec = 0};
+ int ret = 0;
+ struct dpaa2_pool_mp_msg *req_msg = (void *)mp_req.param;
+ struct dpaa2_pool_mp_msg *rsp_msg;
+
+ if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY ||
+ s_dpaa2_pool_ops_idx != RTE_MEMPOOL_MAX_OPS_IDX)
+ return s_dpaa2_pool_ops_idx;
+
+ memset(&mp_req, 0, sizeof(mp_req));
+ strlcpy(mp_req.name, DPAA2_POOL_MP_SYNC, sizeof(mp_req.name));
+ mp_req.len_param = sizeof(struct dpaa2_pool_mp_msg) +
+ sizeof(s_dpaa2_pool_ops_idx);
+ req_msg->msg_type = DPAA2_POOL_OPS_IDX_REQ;
+ memset(&mp_reply, 0, sizeof(struct rte_mp_reply));
+ ret = rte_mp_request_sync(&mp_req, &mp_reply, &ts);
+ if (ret) {
+ DPAA2_MEMPOOL_ERR("%s Failed to get response(%d)",
+ __func__, ret);
+ free(mp_reply.msgs);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ if (!mp_reply.msgs) {
+ DPAA2_MEMPOOL_ERR("%s Failed to get response message",
+ __func__);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ rsp_msg = (void *)mp_reply.msgs;
+ if (rsp_msg->msg_type == DPAA2_POOL_OPS_IDX_RSP) {
+ memcpy(&s_dpaa2_pool_ops_idx, rsp_msg->msg_data,
+ sizeof(s_dpaa2_pool_ops_idx));
+ ret = 0;
+ } else {
+ DPAA2_MEMPOOL_ERR("%s received invalid response(%d)",
+ __func__, rsp_msg->msg_type);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ }
+ free(mp_reply.msgs);
+
+ return ret ? ret : s_dpaa2_pool_ops_idx;
}
static int
@@ -128,10 +208,27 @@ rte_hw_mbuf_create_pool(struct rte_mempool *mp)
if (s_dpaa2_pool_ops_idx == RTE_MEMPOOL_MAX_OPS_IDX) {
s_dpaa2_pool_ops_idx = mp->ops_index;
} else if (s_dpaa2_pool_ops_idx != mp->ops_index) {
- DPAA2_MEMPOOL_ERR("Only single ops index only");
+ DPAA2_MEMPOOL_ERR("Single ops index only");
ret = -EINVAL;
goto err4;
}
+ if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
+ int expected = 0;
+
+ if (rte_atomic_compare_exchange_strong_explicit(
+ &s_dpaa2_pool_mp_msg_setup, &expected, 1,
+ rte_memory_order_relaxed,
+ rte_memory_order_relaxed)) {
+ ret = rte_mp_action_register(DPAA2_POOL_MP_SYNC,
+ dpaa2_mbuf_pool_mp_primary);
+ if (ret && rte_errno != ENOTSUP) {
+ rte_atomic_store_explicit(&s_dpaa2_pool_mp_msg_setup, 0,
+ rte_memory_order_relaxed);
+ ret = -rte_errno;
+ goto err4;
+ }
+ }
+ }
bp_list->next = h_bp_list;
bp_list->mp = mp;
@@ -172,7 +269,7 @@ rte_hw_mbuf_free_pool(struct rte_mempool *mp)
struct dpaa2_dpbp_dev *dpbp_node;
if (!mp->pool_data) {
- DPAA2_MEMPOOL_ERR("Not a valid dpaa2 buffer pool");
+ DPAA2_MEMPOOL_ERR("Not a valid dpaa2 buffer pool %s", mp->name);
return;
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-15 11:34 [PATCH v3-S1 0/5] dpaa2: bus, DMA and mempool base fixes Prashant Gupta
2026-09-15 11:34 ` [PATCH v3-S1 1/5] bus/fslmc: defer bus initialization to probe Prashant Gupta
2026-09-15 11:34 ` [PATCH v3-S1 2/5] bus/fslmc: reduce probe-time logging and MC traffic Prashant Gupta
2026-09-15 11:34 ` [PATCH v3-S1 3/5] dma/dpaa2: fix array-bounds warning in dequeue path Prashant Gupta
2026-09-15 11:34 ` [PATCH v3-S1 4/5] dma/dpaa2: validate IOVA in pre-populate helpers Prashant Gupta
2026-09-15 11:34 ` [PATCH v3-S1 5/5] mempool/dpaa2: support ops index from primary in secondary Prashant Gupta
2026-09-15 15:24 ` [PATCH v3-S1 0/5] dpaa2: bus, DMA and mempool base fixes Stephen Hemminger
2026-09-22 9:21 ` [PATCH v4-S1 " Prashant Gupta
2026-09-22 9:21 ` [PATCH v4-S1 1/5] bus/fslmc: defer bus initialization to probe Prashant Gupta
2026-09-22 9:21 ` [PATCH v4-S1 2/5] bus/fslmc: reduce probe-time logging and MC traffic Prashant Gupta
2026-09-22 9:21 ` [PATCH v4-S1 3/5] dma/dpaa2: fix array-bounds warning in dequeue path Prashant Gupta
2026-09-22 9:21 ` [PATCH v4-S1 4/5] dma/dpaa2: validate IOVA in pre-populate helpers Prashant Gupta
2026-09-22 9:21 ` Prashant Gupta [this message]
2026-09-22 13:59 ` [PATCH v4-S1 0/5] dpaa2: bus, DMA and mempool base fixes Stephen Hemminger
2026-09-29 14:21 ` [PATCH v5-S1 " Prashant Gupta
2026-09-29 14:21 ` [PATCH v5-S1 1/5] bus/fslmc: defer bus initialization to probe Prashant Gupta
2026-09-29 14:21 ` [PATCH v5-S1 2/5] bus/fslmc: reduce probe-time logging and skip ignored devices Prashant Gupta
2026-09-29 14:21 ` [PATCH v5-S1 3/5] dma/dpaa2: fix array-bounds warning and SG FD double-put Prashant Gupta
2026-09-29 14:21 ` [PATCH v5-S1 4/5] dma/dpaa2: validate FLE pool IOVA mapping at vchan setup Prashant Gupta
2026-09-29 14:21 ` [PATCH v5-S1 5/5] mempool/dpaa2: look up ops index locally in secondary Prashant Gupta
2026-09-29 15:45 ` [PATCH v5-S1 0/5] dpaa2: bus, DMA and mempool base fixes Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-06 14:57 ` [EXT] " Prashant Gupta
2026-10-06 15:07 ` [PATCH v6-S1 0/6] " Prashant Gupta
2026-10-06 15:07 ` [PATCH v6-S1 1/6] bus/fslmc: defer bus initialization to probe Prashant Gupta
2026-10-06 15:07 ` [PATCH v6-S1 2/6] bus/fslmc: reduce probe logging and skip ignored devices Prashant Gupta
2026-10-06 15:07 ` [PATCH v6-S1 3/6] dma/dpaa2: use memcpy to fill completion index ring Prashant Gupta
2026-10-06 15:07 ` [PATCH v6-S1 4/6] dma/dpaa2: release SG FLE on completion ring overflow Prashant Gupta
2026-10-06 15:07 ` [PATCH v6-S1 5/6] dma/dpaa2: validate FLE pool IOVA mapping at vchan setup Prashant Gupta
2026-10-06 15:07 ` [PATCH v6-S1 6/6] mempool/dpaa2: look up ops index locally in secondary Prashant Gupta
2026-10-07 15:51 ` [PATCH v6-S1 0/6] dpaa2: bus, DMA and mempool base fixes Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260922092158.2340839-6-prashant.gupta_3@nxp.com \
--to=prashant.gupta_3@nxp.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jun.yang@nxp.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox