DPDK-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Ryan Wolfe <rnwolfe@google.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, joshwash@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/gve: enforce the Rx scatter offload in GQI
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 10:02:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261026100217.2730cc07@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261022212819.1750996-1-rnwolfe@google.com>

On Thu, 22 Oct 2026 17:28:18 -0400
Ryan Wolfe <rnwolfe@google.com> wrote:

> rte_eth_dev_configure() sets the MTU from rxmode.mtu without calling
> mtu_set, and keeps Rx queues that are already set up. Stopping the port
> and reconfiguring it with a larger MTU, or without
> RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER, therefore skipped both the MTU change check
> and the Rx queue setup check. gve also never gave the device that MTU.
> 
> Even with the MTU programmed, a GQI device does not limit what it
> receives to it: on a network with a larger MTU it still delivers
> bigger frames, chained over several Rx buffers. So the configuration
> checks alone cannot keep chained mbufs from an application that did
> not enable scatter.
> 
> Move the configuration check into gve_rx_check_scatter() and call it
> from gve_dev_start() as well as gve_dev_mtu_set(), program the
> configured MTU into the device at start, and have the GQI Rx path drop
> a frame that spans more than one buffer, counted in the Rx errors,
> when the port has not enabled scatter. A dropped descriptor's mbuf is
> now freed, since the refill replaces it.
> 
> Fixes: cffdca824388 ("net/gve: refuse an MTU that needs Rx scatter when it is off")
> 
> Reported-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Wolfe <rnwolfe@google.com>
> ---

Looks good applied to next-net

      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-26 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-19  2:28 [PATCH] net/gve: advertise Rx scatter in GQI queue format Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-19 17:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-19 20:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] net/gve: Rx scatter for GQI Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-19 20:20   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net/gve: advertise Rx scatter in GQI queue format Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-19 20:20   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net/gve: refuse an MTU that needs Rx scatter when it is off Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-20 15:08   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] net/gve: Rx scatter for GQI Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-21 18:25   ` [PATCH] net/gve: check the Rx scatter MTU at device start Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-22 17:00     ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-22 21:28       ` [PATCH v2] net/gve: enforce the Rx scatter offload in GQI Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-26 17:02         ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261026100217.2730cc07@phoenix.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=joshwash@google.com \
    --cc=rnwolfe@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox