From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Ryan Wolfe <rnwolfe@google.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, joshwash@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/gve: enforce the Rx scatter offload in GQI
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 10:02:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261026100217.2730cc07@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261022212819.1750996-1-rnwolfe@google.com>
On Thu, 22 Oct 2026 17:28:18 -0400
Ryan Wolfe <rnwolfe@google.com> wrote:
> rte_eth_dev_configure() sets the MTU from rxmode.mtu without calling
> mtu_set, and keeps Rx queues that are already set up. Stopping the port
> and reconfiguring it with a larger MTU, or without
> RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER, therefore skipped both the MTU change check
> and the Rx queue setup check. gve also never gave the device that MTU.
>
> Even with the MTU programmed, a GQI device does not limit what it
> receives to it: on a network with a larger MTU it still delivers
> bigger frames, chained over several Rx buffers. So the configuration
> checks alone cannot keep chained mbufs from an application that did
> not enable scatter.
>
> Move the configuration check into gve_rx_check_scatter() and call it
> from gve_dev_start() as well as gve_dev_mtu_set(), program the
> configured MTU into the device at start, and have the GQI Rx path drop
> a frame that spans more than one buffer, counted in the Rx errors,
> when the port has not enabled scatter. A dropped descriptor's mbuf is
> now freed, since the refill replaces it.
>
> Fixes: cffdca824388 ("net/gve: refuse an MTU that needs Rx scatter when it is off")
>
> Reported-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Wolfe <rnwolfe@google.com>
> ---
Looks good applied to next-net
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-19 2:28 [PATCH] net/gve: advertise Rx scatter in GQI queue format Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-19 17:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-19 20:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] net/gve: Rx scatter for GQI Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-19 20:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net/gve: advertise Rx scatter in GQI queue format Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-19 20:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net/gve: refuse an MTU that needs Rx scatter when it is off Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-20 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] net/gve: Rx scatter for GQI Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-21 18:25 ` [PATCH] net/gve: check the Rx scatter MTU at device start Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-22 17:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-22 21:28 ` [PATCH v2] net/gve: enforce the Rx scatter offload in GQI Ryan Wolfe
2026-10-26 17:02 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261026100217.2730cc07@phoenix.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=joshwash@google.com \
--cc=rnwolfe@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox