From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/6] ip_frag: drop IPv6 fragments with unexpected headers
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:21:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7a6a466552d488e81f7c9071826cc88@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616210656.464062-5-stephen@networkplumber.org>
> DPDK version of IPv6 reassembly only handles a fragment header placed
> directly after the IPv6 header. With other extension headers in the
> unfragmentable part, ipv6_frag_reassemble() patches the wrong
> next-header field, miscomputes the payload length, and shifts the
> wrong bytes, corrupting the result.
>
> Drop the fragment when l3_len covers more than the IPv6 and fragment
> headers. RFC 8200 allows a receiver to discard packets whose extension
> headers are not in the recommended order, and RFC 9099 recommends
> dropping non-conforming fragmented IPv6 packets, so dropping here is
> permitted rather than a deviation.
>
> Fixes: 4f1a8f633862 ("ip_frag: add IPv6 reassembly")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> ---
> lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c
> index 0e809a01e5..7c1659002b 100644
> --- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c
> +++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c
> @@ -180,6 +180,19 @@ rte_ipv6_frag_reassemble_packet(struct rte_ip_frag_tbl
> *tbl,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Only a fragment header directly following the IPv6 header is
> + * supported. Other extension headers in the unfragmentable part are
> + * not handled: ipv6_frag_reassemble() assumes l3_len covers exactly
> + * the IPv6 and fragment headers when it patches the next-header field
> + * and removes the fragment header. Drop the fragment rather than
> + * produce a corrupt datagram.
> + */
> + if (mb->l3_len != sizeof(struct rte_ipv6_hdr) + sizeof(*frag_hdr)) {
> + IP_FRAG_MBUF2DR(dr, mb);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
Hmm, not sure this is a right thing.
Yes, we don't support properly ipv6 options that are *before* fragment hreader
(so called Per-Fragment Headers), but AFAIR we do support ipv6 options
that come *after* fragment header (Extension headers).
> if (unlikely(trim > 0))
> rte_pktmbuf_trim(mb, trim);
>
> --
> 2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 21:05 [PATCH 0/6] ip_frag: fix reassembly defects and add test Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] ip_frag: tolerate duplicate fragments Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 8:08 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-30 13:32 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] ip_frag: discard datagrams with overlapping fragments Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-19 13:12 ` Morten Brørup
2026-06-19 17:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-22 15:01 ` Morten Brørup
2026-06-22 15:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 8:16 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] ip_frag: include protocol in IPv4 reassembly key Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 8:17 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] ip_frag: drop IPv6 fragments with unexpected headers Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 9:21 ` Konstantin Ananyev [this message]
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] ip_frag: reject oversized reassembled datagrams Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 9:32 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-16 21:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] app/test: add test for IP reassembly Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-19 13:24 ` [PATCH 0/6] ip_frag: fix reassembly defects and add test Morten Brørup
2026-06-22 15:03 ` Morten Brørup
2026-06-30 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] " Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] ip_frag: tolerate duplicate fragments Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] ip_frag: discard datagrams with overlapping fragments Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 8:13 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-06-30 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] ip_frag: include protocol in IPv4 reassembly key Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] ip_frag: drop IPv6 fragments with per-fragment headers Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] ip_frag: reject oversized reassembled datagrams Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] app/test: add test for IP reassembly Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] ip_frag: remove use of rte_memcpy Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] doc: add release note about ip_frag changes Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 19:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 8:22 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-07-01 16:20 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] ip_frag: fix reassembly defects and add test Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 16:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] ip_frag: tolerate duplicate fragments Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 16:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] ip_frag: discard datagrams with overlapping fragments Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 16:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] ip_frag: include protocol in IPv4 reassembly key Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 16:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] ip_frag: drop IPv6 fragments with per-fragment headers Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 16:52 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-07-01 16:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] ip_frag: reject oversized reassembled datagrams Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 16:20 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] app/test: add test for IP reassembly Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 16:20 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] ip_frag: remove use of rte_memcpy Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 16:53 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-07-01 16:20 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] doc: add release note about ip_frag changes Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-01 16:42 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-07-02 20:55 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] ip_frag: fix reassembly defects and add test Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c7a6a466552d488e81f7c9071826cc88@huawei.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox