dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] [i915] Fix another use of the wrong interlace mask to return to progressive mode
@ 2012-02-24  9:51 Christian Schmidt
  2012-02-24 14:24 ` Daniel Vetter
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christian Schmidt @ 2012-02-24  9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Airlie; +Cc: dri-devel

intel_display.c:            pipeconf |= PIPECONF_INTERLACE_W_FIELD_INDICATION;
intel_display.c:            pipeconf &= ~PIPECONF_INTERLACE_MASK; /* progressive */
intel_display.c:            pipeconf |= PIPECONF_INTERLACE_W_FIELD_INDICATION;
intel_display.c:            pipeconf &= ~PIPECONF_INTERLACE_W_FIELD_INDICATION; /* progressive */

The second setting of progressive mode should use PIPECONF_INTERLACE_MASK, too.

Signed-off-by: Christian Schmidt <schmidt@digadd.de>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 56a8554..3a3ca1a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -5048,7 +5048,7 @@ static int i9xx_crtc_mode_set(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
 		adjusted_mode->crtc_vsync_end -= 1;
 		adjusted_mode->crtc_vsync_start -= 1;
 	} else
-		pipeconf &= ~PIPECONF_INTERLACE_W_FIELD_INDICATION; /* progressive */
+		pipeconf &= ~PIPECONF_INTERLACE_MASK; /* progressive */
 
 	I915_WRITE(HTOTAL(pipe),
 		   (adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay - 1) |
-- 
1.7.8.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] [i915] Fix another use of the wrong interlace mask to return to progressive mode
  2012-02-24  9:51 [PATCH] [i915] Fix another use of the wrong interlace mask to return to progressive mode Christian Schmidt
@ 2012-02-24 14:24 ` Daniel Vetter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2012-02-24 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Schmidt; +Cc: dri-devel

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:51:42AM +0100, Christian Schmidt wrote:
> intel_display.c:            pipeconf |= PIPECONF_INTERLACE_W_FIELD_INDICATION;
> intel_display.c:            pipeconf &= ~PIPECONF_INTERLACE_MASK; /* progressive */
> intel_display.c:            pipeconf |= PIPECONF_INTERLACE_W_FIELD_INDICATION;
> intel_display.c:            pipeconf &= ~PIPECONF_INTERLACE_W_FIELD_INDICATION; /* progressive */
> 
> The second setting of progressive mode should use PIPECONF_INTERLACE_MASK, too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Schmidt <schmidt@digadd.de>

Already fixed in -fixes. Furthermore we have (hopefully) fully working
interlaced support merged into -next (already pushed out to Dave's
drm-next tree).
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-24 14:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-24  9:51 [PATCH] [i915] Fix another use of the wrong interlace mask to return to progressive mode Christian Schmidt
2012-02-24 14:24 ` Daniel Vetter

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox