From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
To: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/exynos: remove struct *_win_data abstraction on planes
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 12:42:13 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150130144213.GD30820@joana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CB0978.5020207@samsung.com>
Hi Joonyoung,
2015-01-30 Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>:
> +Cc Inki,
>
> Hi,
>
> On 01/23/2015 09:42 PM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
> >
> > struct {fimd,mixer,vidi}_win_data was just keeping the same data
> > as struct exynos_drm_plane thus get ride of it and use exynos_drm_plane
> > directly.
> >
> > It changes how planes are created and remove .win_mode_set() callback
> > that was only filling all *_win_data structs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_crtc.c | 9 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_crtc.h | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c | 14 --
> > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.h | 5 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c | 181 ++++++++++---------------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_plane.c | 20 +--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_plane.h | 6 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_vidi.c | 123 ++++-------------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c | 212 +++++++++++-------------------
> > 9 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 389 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_crtc.c
> > index d0f4e1b..5cd6c1a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_crtc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_crtc.c
> > @@ -287,13 +287,13 @@ static void exynos_drm_crtc_attach_mode_property(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> > }
> >
> > struct exynos_drm_crtc *exynos_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
> > + struct drm_plane *plane,
> > int pipe,
> > enum exynos_drm_output_type type,
> > struct exynos_drm_crtc_ops *ops,
> > void *ctx)
> > {
> > struct exynos_drm_crtc *exynos_crtc;
> > - struct drm_plane *plane;
> > struct exynos_drm_private *private = drm_dev->dev_private;
> > struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> > int ret;
> > @@ -309,12 +309,6 @@ struct exynos_drm_crtc *exynos_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
> > exynos_crtc->type = type;
> > exynos_crtc->ops = ops;
> > exynos_crtc->ctx = ctx;
> > - plane = exynos_plane_init(drm_dev, 1 << pipe,
> > - DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY);
> > - if (IS_ERR(plane)) {
> > - ret = PTR_ERR(plane);
> > - goto err_plane;
> > - }
> >
>
> The crtc should have one primary plane, i think it is more reasonable
> exynos_drm_crtc_create function creates primary plane.
Yes and it has a primary plane. They are defined in the drivers' struct *_context
the same way *_win_data was defined. And they allocated together wit the
context struct and and initialized by exynos_plane_init() right before the
call to exynos_drm_crtc_create(). Check the fimd_bind() part of this patch for
example.
Gustavo
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-30 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-23 12:42 [PATCH 1/6] drm/exynos: remove leftover code using event_list Gustavo Padovan
2015-01-23 12:42 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/exynos: track vblank events on a per crtc basis Gustavo Padovan
2015-01-27 12:59 ` Daniel Stone
2015-01-27 13:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-29 17:10 ` [PATCH -v2] " Gustavo Padovan
2015-01-30 2:44 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-30 14:30 ` Gustavo Padovan
2015-01-30 15:57 ` Daniel Stone
2015-01-30 16:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-30 17:17 ` Gustavo Padovan
2015-02-02 5:38 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-23 12:42 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/exynos: Remove exynos_plane_dpms() call with no effect Gustavo Padovan
2015-01-30 2:12 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-30 14:36 ` Gustavo Padovan
2015-02-02 4:32 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-23 12:42 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/exynos: remove leftover functions declarations Gustavo Padovan
2015-01-30 2:48 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-23 12:42 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/exynos: remove struct *_win_data abstraction on planes Gustavo Padovan
2015-01-30 4:32 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-30 14:42 ` Gustavo Padovan [this message]
2015-02-02 4:53 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-23 12:43 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/exynos: do not copy adjusted mode into mode during crtc mode_set Gustavo Padovan
2015-01-30 4:53 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-30 14:44 ` Gustavo Padovan
2015-02-02 4:55 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-02-03 14:16 ` Gustavo Padovan
2015-02-04 2:10 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-30 2:21 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/exynos: remove leftover code using event_list Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-30 13:37 ` Gustavo Padovan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150130144213.GD30820@joana \
--to=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox