dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] drm/edid: detach debugfs EDID override from EDID property update
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 23:07:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1BZCPI8Fz353Aw9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b68842462d58ca3c550049a95687f0ead81d615c.1665496046.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 04:49:43PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Having the EDID override debugfs directly update the EDID property is
> problematic. The update is partial only. The driver has no way of
> knowing it's been updated. Mode list is not updated. It's an
> inconsistent state.
> 
> Detach debugfs EDID override from the property update completely. Only
> set and reset a separate override EDID copy from debugfs, and have it
> take effect only at detect (via EDID read). The copy is at
> connector->edid_override.
> 
> This also brings override EDID closer to firmware EDID in behaviour.
> 
> Add validation of the override EDID which we completely lacked.
> 
> Note that IGT already forces a detect whenever tests update the override
> EDID.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c  | 56 ++++++++++++-------------------------
>  include/drm/drm_connector.h | 11 +++++---
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index c3cf942186b7..0f2898badd51 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -2207,8 +2207,8 @@ static struct edid *drm_get_override_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  {
>  	struct edid *override = NULL;
>  
> -	if (connector->override_edid)
> -		override = drm_edid_duplicate(connector->edid_blob_ptr->data);
> +	if (connector->edid_override)
> +		override = drm_edid_duplicate(connector->edid_override->edid);
>  
>  	if (!override)
>  		override = drm_load_edid_firmware(connector);
> @@ -2223,10 +2223,10 @@ static struct edid *drm_get_override_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  /* For debugfs edid_override implementation */
>  int drm_edid_override_show(struct drm_connector *connector, struct seq_file *m)
>  {
> -	struct drm_property_blob *edid = connector->edid_blob_ptr;
> +	const struct drm_edid *drm_edid = connector->edid_override;
>  
> -	if (connector->override_edid && edid)
> -		seq_write(m, edid->data, edid->length);
> +	if (drm_edid)
> +		seq_write(m, drm_edid->edid, drm_edid->size);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -2235,32 +2235,33 @@ int drm_edid_override_show(struct drm_connector *connector, struct seq_file *m)
>  int drm_edid_override_set(struct drm_connector *connector, const void *edid,
>  			  size_t size)
>  {
> -	int ret;
> +	drm_edid_free(connector->edid_override);
>  
> -	if (size < EDID_LENGTH || edid_size(edid) > size)
> +	connector->edid_override = drm_edid_alloc(edid, size);
> +	if (!drm_edid_valid(connector->edid_override)) {
> +		drm_dbg_kms(connector->dev, "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] EDID override invalid\n",
> +			    connector->base.id, connector->name);
> +		drm_edid_free(connector->edid_override);
> +		connector->edid_override = NULL;
>  		return -EINVAL;

Hmm. Should we perhaps invest in some locking around these parts?

> -
> -	connector->override_edid = false;
> +	}
>  
>  	drm_dbg_kms(connector->dev, "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] EDID override set\n",
>  		    connector->base.id, connector->name);
>  
> -	ret = drm_connector_update_edid_property(connector, edid);
> -	if (!ret)
> -		connector->override_edid = true;
> -
> -	return ret;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /* For debugfs edid_override implementation */
>  int drm_edid_override_reset(struct drm_connector *connector)
>  {
> -	connector->override_edid = false;
> -
>  	drm_dbg_kms(connector->dev, "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] EDID override reset\n",
>  		    connector->base.id, connector->name);
>  
> -	return drm_connector_update_edid_property(connector, NULL);
> +	drm_edid_free(connector->edid_override);
> +	connector->edid_override = NULL;
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -6634,23 +6635,6 @@ int drm_edid_connector_update(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  {
>  	int count;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * FIXME: Reconcile the differences in override_edid handling between
> -	 * this and drm_connector_update_edid_property().
> -	 *
> -	 * If override_edid is set, and the EDID passed in here originates from
> -	 * drm_edid_read() and friends, it will be the override EDID, and there
> -	 * are no issues. drm_connector_update_edid_property() ignoring requests
> -	 * to set the EDID dates back to a time when override EDID was not
> -	 * handled at the low level EDID read.
> -	 *
> -	 * The only way the EDID passed in here can be different from the
> -	 * override EDID is when a driver passes in an EDID that does *not*
> -	 * originate from drm_edid_read() and friends, or passes in a stale
> -	 * cached version. This, in turn, is a question of when an override EDID
> -	 * set via debugfs should take effect.
> -	 */
> -
>  	count = _drm_edid_connector_update(connector, drm_edid);
>  
>  	_drm_update_tile_info(connector, drm_edid);
> @@ -6665,10 +6649,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_edid_connector_update);
>  static int _drm_connector_update_edid_property(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  					       const struct drm_edid *drm_edid)
>  {
> -	/* ignore requests to set edid when overridden */
> -	if (connector->override_edid)
> -		return 0;
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Set the display info, using edid if available, otherwise resetting
>  	 * the values to defaults. This duplicates the work done in
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_connector.h b/include/drm/drm_connector.h
> index b1b2df48d42c..09a7d7f23e4a 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_connector.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_connector.h
> @@ -1550,12 +1550,15 @@ struct drm_connector {
>  	struct drm_cmdline_mode cmdline_mode;
>  	/** @force: a DRM_FORCE_<foo> state for forced mode sets */
>  	enum drm_connector_force force;
> +
>  	/**
> -	 * @override_edid: has the EDID been overwritten through debugfs for
> -	 * testing? Do not modify outside of drm_edid_override_set() and
> -	 * drm_edid_override_reset().
> +	 * @edid_override: Override EDID set via debugfs.
> +	 *
> +	 * Do not modify or access outside of the drm_edid_override_* family of
> +	 * functions.
>  	 */
> -	bool override_edid;
> +	const struct drm_edid *edid_override;
> +
>  	/** @epoch_counter: used to detect any other changes in connector, besides status */
>  	u64 epoch_counter;
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-19 20:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-11 13:49 [PATCH 00/15] drm/edid: EDID override refactoring and fixes Jani Nikula
2022-10-11 13:49 ` [PATCH 01/15] drm/i915/hdmi: do dual mode detect only if connected Jani Nikula
2022-10-13 18:41   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-10-13 19:24     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-10-14  8:14       ` Jani Nikula
2022-10-19 18:56         ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-10-19 19:23       ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-10-20  8:57         ` Jani Nikula
2022-10-20  9:25           ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-10-11 13:49 ` [PATCH 02/15] drm/i915/hdmi: stop using connector->override_edid Jani Nikula
2022-10-19 19:36   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-10-11 13:49 ` [PATCH 03/15] drm/amd/display: " Jani Nikula
2022-10-11 14:07   ` Harry Wentland
2022-10-11 14:11     ` Jani Nikula
2022-10-11 14:19       ` Alex Deucher
2022-10-11 13:49 ` [PATCH 04/15] drm/edid: debug log EDID override set/reset Jani Nikula
2022-10-19 19:36   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-10-11 13:49 ` [PATCH 05/15] drm/edid: abstract debugfs override EDID show better Jani Nikula
2022-10-19 19:37   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-10-11 13:49 ` [PATCH 06/15] drm/edid: rename drm_add_override_edid_modes() to drm_edid_override_connector_update() Jani Nikula
2022-10-19 20:04   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-10-11 13:49 ` [PATCH 07/15] drm/edid: split drm_edid block count helper Jani Nikula
2022-10-19 19:44   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-10-11 13:49 ` [PATCH 08/15] drm/edid: add function for checking drm_edid validity Jani Nikula
2022-10-19 19:46   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-10-11 13:49 ` [PATCH 09/15] drm/edid: detach debugfs EDID override from EDID property update Jani Nikula
2022-10-19 20:07   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2022-10-11 13:49 ` [PATCH 10/15] drm/edid/firmware: drop redundant connector_name variable/parameter Jani Nikula
2022-10-19 19:52   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-10-11 13:49 ` [PATCH 11/15] drm/edid/firmware: rename drm_load_edid_firmware() to drm_edid_load_firmware() Jani Nikula
2022-10-19 20:07   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-10-11 13:49 ` [PATCH 12/15] drm/edid: use struct drm_edid for override/firmware EDID Jani Nikula
2022-10-19 20:01   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-10-11 13:49 ` [PATCH 13/15] drm/edid: move edid load declarations to internal header Jani Nikula
2022-10-19 20:08   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-10-11 13:49 ` [PATCH 14/15] drm/edid/firmware: convert to drm device specific logging Jani Nikula
2022-10-19 20:10   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-10-11 13:49 ` [PATCH 15/15] drm/edid: convert to " Jani Nikula
2022-10-19 20:12   ` Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y1BZCPI8Fz353Aw9@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).