Re: [PATCH 00/15] Device Evidence and Trust for PCI Security Protocol (TDISP)

[Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>]

On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 12:20:51PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 2/9/26 12:12, Xu Yilun wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 09:55:33PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 09:48:30AM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Glad to see you all here to make progress! Intel can also help on this.
> > > > Can we have a meeting to discuss on these topics? As Alexey mentioned,
> > > > previously we had a bi-weekly call, perhaps use that for our first
> > > > meeting? Or what time works best for everyone?
> > > 
> > > I prefer we defer such community discussions till September, that
> > > seems appropriate given some dates I've seen.
> > 
> > Hi Ankit & Jason,
> > 
> > Do we have a plan to schedule a meeting to discuss next steps?
> > 
> > If so, we can figure out a specific time on the Discord channel.
> > https://discord.gg/KKqC438c

> So I've been trying to find a time slot. Say, keep it on Thursdays
> (USA) (kinda short notice), bi-weekly, we can do:

I've asked several people in Europe to help on parts of this series,
and combined with China/Aus someone is going to end up left out.

I know people are anxious about their projects. In the short term I
will volunteer to send patches (ie bug fixes!) to Linus in the CC area
Dan was responsible for. Please email me if something needs some
attention and we can figure it out.

To fully move forward we need to establish a new TSM maintainer
team. In my past experience a consensus has emerged off list, I
suggest we try that here as well. Several people should be
recruited. I will also volunteer to help train and launch a new team.

I can say that several people from NVIDIA are working on the ideas in
this patch series. Ankit is setting up a team to focus on upstream
patches for all of CC inside NVIDIA. I've asked Jiri Pirko to work on
the PCI evidence uAPI based on his deep netlink experience, and Leon
Romanovsky to work on the binding problem/adversarial/trust level
driver core idea. They will share their approaches for solving these
problems as seperate proposals.

> Scenario A:
> Seattle (PDT, UTC-7)		07:00 – 08:00	Day 1
> Atlantic Time (ADT, UTC-3)	11:00 – 12:00	Day 1
> Berlin (CEST, UTC+2)		16:00 – 17:00	Day 1
> India (IST, UTC+5:30)		19:30 – 20:30	Day 1
> China (CST, UTC+8)		22:00 – 23:00	Day 1
> Sydney (AEST, UTC+10)		00:00 – 01:00	Day 2 (I can do it once in 2 weeks)

This is the only time Europe could reasonably participate in,
obviously it is not OK for China and Aus.

> Please, comment. I find these calls pretty productive syncups. So
> far we were not having Europe in these calls.

Calls are undoutably useful!

> Alternatively, wait until the LPC in a month but I suspect not
> everybody is going to be there.
 
LPC is not that far away, I think we should have a goal of having a
consensus for or at LPC

Regards,
Jason