From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Juan Casse <jcasse@chromium.org>
Cc: Grant Grundler <grundler@chromium.org>, fio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Adds check for numberio during verify phase.
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:02:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521CDBC2.8050705@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377552162-31741-1-git-send-email-jcasse@chromium.org>
On 08/26/2013 03:22 PM, Juan Casse wrote:
> We check numberio to detect stale blocks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Casse <jcasse@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@chromium.org>
> ---
> HOWTO | 7 +++++++
> init.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ioengine.h | 1 +
> iolog.c | 1 +
> iolog.h | 1 +
> libfio.c | 3 ++-
> options.c | 9 +++++++++
> thread_options.h | 2 ++
> verify.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 9 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/HOWTO b/HOWTO
> index 005dac2..14ff8b5 100644
> --- a/HOWTO
> +++ b/HOWTO
> @@ -657,6 +657,13 @@ ioengine=str Defines how the job issues io to the file. The following
> filename, eg ioengine=external:/tmp/foo.o
> to load ioengine foo.o in /tmp.
>
> +data_integrity_check
> + If this option is given, fio will check the i/o number of
> + each block read back during the verification phase. Fio
> + checks numberio to detect stale blocks. Currently, this
> + option requires synchronous i/o, and equal-sized read and
> + write blocks. This option requires workloads that write data.
I think this use case is just too narrow. Why does it require sync IO
and equal read/write sizes? Can't you just replay and re-generate and
compare?
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-27 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-26 21:22 [PATCH 1/2] Adds check for numberio during verify phase Juan Casse
2013-08-26 21:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] Adds check for rand_seed " Juan Casse
2013-08-26 22:11 ` Grant Grundler
2013-08-27 17:02 ` Jens Axboe
2013-08-27 17:25 ` Grant Grundler
2013-08-28 7:14 ` Erwan Velu
2013-08-31 4:31 ` Jens Axboe
2013-09-02 8:38 ` Erwan Velu
2013-09-03 22:38 ` Jens Axboe
2013-08-27 17:02 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2013-08-27 17:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] Adds check for numberio " Grant Grundler
2013-08-27 17:50 ` Juan Casse
2013-08-27 18:44 ` Juan Casse
2013-08-27 20:48 ` Juan Casse
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-04 1:10 Juan Casse
2013-09-04 1:14 Juan Casse
2013-09-04 1:15 Juan Casse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521CDBC2.8050705@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grundler@chromium.org \
--cc=jcasse@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox