From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
djwong@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/12] ext4: Test atomic writes allocation and write codepaths with bigalloc
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 16:54:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001c5111-84c8-4bb0-951a-cc51587479be@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a223c31b43ce3a2c7a3534efbc0477651f1fc2bb.1755849134.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
On 22/08/2025 09:02, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> From: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
>
> This test does a parallel RWF_ATOMIC IO on a multiple truncated files in
> a small FS. The idea is to stress ext4 allocator to ensure we are able
> to handle low space scenarios correctly with atomic writes. We brute
> force this for different blocksize and clustersizes and after each
> iteration we ensure the data was not torn or corrupted using fio crc
> verification.
>
> Note that in this test we use overlapping atomic writes of same io size.
> Although serializing racing writes is not guaranteed for RWF_ATOMIC,
> NVMe and SCSI provide this guarantee as an inseparable feature to
> power-fail atomicity. Keeping the iosize as same also ensures that ext4
> doesn't tear the write due to racing ioend unwritten conversion.
>
> The value of this test is that we make sure the RWF_ATOMIC is handled
> correctly by ext4 as well as test that the block layer doesn't split or
> only generate multiple bios for an atomic write.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tests/ext4/062 | 203 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/ext4/062.out | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 205 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/ext4/062
> create mode 100644 tests/ext4/062.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/ext4/062 b/tests/ext4/062
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..d48f69d3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/ext4/062
> @@ -0,0 +1,203 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2025 IBM Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 062
> +#
> +# This test does a parallel RWF_ATOMIC IO on a multiple truncated files in a
> +# small FS. The idea is to stress ext4 allocator to ensure we are able to
> +# handle low space scenarios correctly with atomic writes.. We brute force this
> +# for all possible blocksize and clustersizes and after each iteration we
> +# ensure the data was not torn or corrupted using fio crc verification.
> +#
> +# Note that in this test we use overlapping atomic writes of same io size.
> +# Although serializing racing writes is not guaranteed for RWF_ATOMIC, NVMe and
> +# SCSI provide this guarantee as an inseparable feature to power-fail
> +# atomicity. Keeping the iosize as same also ensures that ext4 doesn't tear the
> +# write due to racing ioend unwritten conversion.
> +#
> +# The value of this test is that we make sure the RWF_ATOMIC is handled
> +# correctly by ext4 as well as test that the block layer doesn't split or only
> +# generate multiple bios for an atomic write.
> +#
> +
> +. ./common/preamble
> +. ./common/atomicwrites
> +
> +_begin_fstest auto rw stress atomicwrites
> +
> +_require_scratch_write_atomic
> +_require_aiodio
> +_require_fio_version "3.38+"
> +
> +FSSIZE=$((360*1024*1024))
> +FIO_LOAD=$(($(nproc) * LOAD_FACTOR))
> +
> +# Calculate bs as per bdev atomic write units.
> +bdev_awu_min=$(_get_atomic_write_unit_min $SCRATCH_DEV)
> +bdev_awu_max=$(_get_atomic_write_unit_max $SCRATCH_DEV)
> +bs=$(_max 4096 "$bdev_awu_min")
> +
> +function create_fio_configs()
> +{
> + local bsize=$1
> + create_fio_aw_config $bsize
> + create_fio_verify_config $bsize
> +}
> +
> +function create_fio_verify_config()
> +{
> + local bsize=$1
> +cat >$fio_verify_config <<EOF
> + [global]
> + direct=1
> + ioengine=libaio
> + rw=read
> + bs=$bsize
> + fallocate=truncate
> + size=$((FSSIZE / 12))
> + iodepth=$FIO_LOAD
> + numjobs=$FIO_LOAD
> + group_reporting=1
> + atomic=1
> +
> + verify_only=1
> + verify_state_save=0
> + verify=crc32c
> + verify_fatal=1
> + verify_write_sequence=0
> +
> + [verify-job1]
> + filename=$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile-job1
> +
> + [verify-job2]
> + filename=$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile-job2
> +
> + [verify-job3]
> + filename=$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile-job3
> +
> + [verify-job4]
> + filename=$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile-job4
> +
> + [verify-job5]
> + filename=$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile-job5
> +
> + [verify-job6]
> + filename=$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile-job6
> +
> + [verify-job7]
> + filename=$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile-job7
> +
> + [verify-job8]
> + filename=$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile-job8
do you really need multiple jobs for verify?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-02 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-22 8:01 [PATCH v5 00/11] Add more tests for multi fs block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-22 8:02 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] common/rc: Add _min() and _max() helpers Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-22 8:02 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] common/rc: Add _require_fio_version helper Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-25 16:08 ` Zorro Lang
2025-08-27 15:16 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-28 15:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-29 16:59 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-30 17:09 ` Zorro Lang
2025-09-01 11:40 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-02 5:30 ` Zorro Lang
2025-09-02 8:29 ` John Garry
2025-09-02 14:50 ` John Garry
2025-09-05 15:51 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-05 16:14 ` John Garry
2025-09-05 16:39 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-07 5:18 ` Zorro Lang
2025-09-07 5:29 ` Zorro Lang
2025-09-09 7:16 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-09 7:26 ` John Garry
2025-09-09 9:02 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-10 6:07 ` Zorro Lang
2025-09-10 6:38 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-22 8:02 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] common/rc: Add a helper to run fsx on a given file Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-22 8:02 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] ltp/fsx.c: Add atomic writes support to fsx Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-02 15:06 ` John Garry
2025-09-05 16:29 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-08 7:53 ` John Garry
2025-09-09 6:57 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-09 7:55 ` John Garry
2025-09-09 8:59 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-22 8:02 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] generic: Add atomic write test using fio crc check verifier Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-02 15:09 ` John Garry
2025-08-22 8:02 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] generic: Add atomic write test using fio verify on file mixed mappings Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-02 15:10 ` John Garry
2025-08-22 8:02 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] generic: Add atomic write multi-fsblock O_[D]SYNC tests Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-02 15:14 ` John Garry
2025-09-05 16:30 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-22 8:02 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] generic: Stress fsx with atomic writes enabled Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-02 15:18 ` John Garry
2025-09-05 16:40 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-22 8:02 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] generic: Add sudden shutdown tests for multi block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-02 15:49 ` John Garry
2025-09-05 17:06 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-08 14:27 ` John Garry
2025-09-09 6:44 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-09 7:49 ` John Garry
2025-09-09 9:01 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-09 9:04 ` John Garry
2025-09-09 11:43 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-22 8:02 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] ext4: test atomic write and ioend codepaths with bigalloc Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-28 15:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-09-02 15:52 ` John Garry
2025-08-22 8:02 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] ext4: Test atomic writes allocation and write " Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-02 15:54 ` John Garry [this message]
2025-09-05 17:10 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-08 7:39 ` John Garry
2025-08-22 8:02 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] ext4: Atomic write test for extent split across leaf nodes Ojaswin Mujoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=001c5111-84c8-4bb0-951a-cc51587479be@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox