From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Is is possible to submit binary image as fstest test case?
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 18:05:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161007160551.GD11398@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161007091838.GG9806@dastard>
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 08:18:38PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 04:12:56PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just as the title says, for some case(OK, btrfs again) we need to
> > catch a file system in special timing.
> >
> > In this specific case, we need to grab a btrfs image undergoing
> > balancing, just before the balance finished.
> >
> > Although we can use flakey to drop all write, we still don't have
> > method to catch the timing of the that transaction.
> >
> >
> > On the other hand, we can tweak our local kernel, adding
> > msleep()/message and dump the disk during the sleep.
> > And the image I dumped can easily trigger btrfs kernel and user-space bug.
> >
> > So I'm wondering if I can just upload a zipped raw image as part of
> > the test case?
>
> Preferably not. We've managed to avoid pre-built images in xfstests
> for 15 years, so there'd have to be a really good reason to start
> doing this, especially as once we open that floodgate we'll end up
> with everyone wanting to do this and it will blow out the size of
> the repository in now time.
>
> If the issue is just timing or being unable to trigger an error
> at the right time, this is what error injection frameworks or
> debug-only sysfs hooks are for. The XFS kernel code has both,
> xfstests use both, and they pretty much do away with the need for
> custom binary filesystem images for such testing...
Error injection framework may not be alwasy available, eg. in kernels
built for production. Yet I'd like to make the test possible.
Also, I find it useful to keep the exact images that are attached to a
report and not necessarily try to recreate it to trigger a bug. If the
images are small, hosting them with the sources makes testing easy.
Big images would probably go to own repository and be linked.
I don't really expect fstests to store crafted images and would advise
Qu to not even try to propose that, because the answer was quite
predictable.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-07 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-06 8:12 Is is possible to submit binary image as fstest test case? Qu Wenruo
2016-10-06 12:29 ` Brian Foster
2016-10-06 19:24 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-10-07 15:51 ` David Sterba
2016-10-07 9:18 ` Dave Chinner
2016-10-07 9:26 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-10-07 10:19 ` Dave Chinner
2016-10-07 16:16 ` David Sterba
2016-10-08 3:28 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-10-07 16:05 ` David Sterba [this message]
2016-10-09 23:56 ` Dave Chinner
2016-10-14 18:11 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161007160551.GD11398@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox