Re: [RFC PATCH] check: try to fix the test device if it gets corrupted

[Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:53:01AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 05:40:47PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> > > 
> > > So one thing we could do is _xfs_scratch_repair and _xfs_test_repair?
> 
> Hmm, or maybe _xfs_repair_scratch and _xfs_repair_test; since at least
> for English speakers verb-object is probably more natural.  But if you
> or Darrick have a strong preference I'm don't care that much.

I'm not native English speaker, you (and other native English speakers)
decide :)

> 
> > Then all existing _scratch_xfs_repair calls need a rename, but I'm fine
> > with the rename.
> > 
> > > 
> > > The other thing is how much of the cleanup in common/xfs should be
> > > segregated into a separate commit (and I'm not sure how competent I'm
> > > going to be ate doing that cleanup, but I'm willing to give it a go).
> > 
> > I think we can do minimal cleanup in this patch (like the rename of
> > _scratch_xfs_repair to _xfs_scratch_repair) and do other cleanups in
> > separate commits (if there's still any).
> 
> If you don't mind I'll do the renames as a separate commit since
> that's much easier to verify/review.

Sure, make sense to me.

Thanks,
Eryu