public inbox for fstests@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, zlang@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs/514: Check xfsprogs version for verifying the xfs_db commands
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 12:59:05 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35562276-aece-fb81-ad2c-ceeb3decade9@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210628153524.GB13767@locust>

Hi,

On 6/28/21 9:05 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 02:22:58PM +0530, Anju T Sudhakar wrote:
>> xfs_db commands like `attr_remove, attr_set, btheight, and logformat`,
>> are documented only in xfsprogs version v5.5 and later. So skip checking
>> for these commands in xfs_db manpage,if the test is running with
>> xfsprogs version less than v5.5.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> Query: The reason to add this check is, while running xfstest with an
>> older version of xfsprogs, this test case flags as failure, though
>> xfs_db is not expected to have those commands. Otherwise upon failure we
>> should ask the user to use the latest version of xfsprogs.
>> OR is there any better solution for this?
> If you're shipping xfsprogs 5.5 in a product, why not update the manpage
> to document the functionality that's in your product?  If you aren't
> shipping 5.5, then why run such an old version?
>
> --D


OK. Then I think we can drop patch 2/3 and 3/3 in this series, as both 
checks for the

xfsprogs version to run the test.



Thanks,

Anju



  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-04  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-28  8:52 [PATCH 0/3] xfstest random fixes Anju T Sudhakar
2021-06-28  8:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs/504: Add scratch_mount before checking for xfs_scrub unicode support Anju T Sudhakar
2021-06-28 15:43   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-28  8:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs/514: Check xfsprogs version for verifying the xfs_db commands Anju T Sudhakar
2021-06-28 14:16   ` Zorro Lang
2021-06-28 15:35   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-04  7:29     ` Anju T Sudhakar [this message]
2021-06-28  8:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs/515: Check xfsprogs version for testing xfs_quota commands Anju T Sudhakar
2021-06-28 14:19   ` Zorro Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=35562276-aece-fb81-ad2c-ceeb3decade9@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zlang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox