From: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>, Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Code to allow cros-compilation on chromeOS
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 14:04:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59155058.4070200@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59116BCD.2010104@cn.fujitsu.com>
Hi Eryu
I tried to use higher version autoconf (e.g,
autoconf-2.65-1.fc13.noarch.rpm) to compile the lastest xfstests on
RHEL6.9GA, and
it worked fine. Shoud we update autoconf-2.63-5.1.el6.noarch on
RHEL6.9GA or fix xfstests to adapt to older version autoconf? :-)
Thanks,
Xiao Yang.
On 2017/05/09 15:12, Xiao Yang wrote:
> On 2017/05/08 18:50, Eryu Guan wrote:
>> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 06:19:27PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote:
>>> On 2017/04/25 21:09, Eryu Guan wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 04:33:48PM -0700, Gwendal Grignou wrote:
>>>>> - Request LIBTOOL to be used
>>>>> - Set topbuildir based on a Makefile variable to call libtool
>>>>> - Use /usr/local instead of /var for xfstest final location
>>>>> - Move macros from aclocal.m4 to acinclude.m4, aclocal.m4 is
>>>>> autogenerated.
>>>>> - Use autoconf variables @prefix@, @exec_prefix@.
>>>>>
>>>>> The regular way of compiling xfstests - make - remains.
>>>>> But it now runs autoreconf and libtoolize -i to produce a valid
>>>>> configure.
>>>>> Verified with 'make install --dry-run' that files are installed at
>>>>> the
>>>>> same place.
>>>>> Verified compiling in chromeOS chroot works as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou<gwendal@chromium.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>>> Removal of instal-sh, use of autoreconf
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>>> Use of @exec_prefix@ variable, unify installation location.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v4:
>>>>> Add --install option to autoreconf so that aclocal is called with
>>>>> -I m4.
>>>>> Keep using AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR when autoconf is called directly.
>>>>> With --install option and AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR undefined verify
>>>>> that configure
>>>>> still works.
>>>> Thanks a lot for the update! v4 works for me too with RHEL6, RHEL7 and
>>>> Fedora 25 hosts.
>>>>
>>> Hi Eryu
>>>
>>> When appling v4 patch, i still got the following error messgae on
>>> RHEL6.9GA:
>>> ============================================================================
>>>
>>> [root@RHEL6U9GA_Intel64 xfstests]# make
>>> autoreconf --include=m4
>>> configure.ac:5: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PACKAGE_GLOBALS
>>> If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
>>> See the Autoconf documentation.
>>> configure.ac:6: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PACKAGE_UTILITIES
>>> configure.ac:43: error: possibly undefined macro:
>>> AC_PACKAGE_NEED_UUIDCOMPARE
>>> configure.ac:48: error: possibly undefined macro:
>>> AC_PACKAGE_NEED_SYS_ACL_H
>>> configure.ac:49: error: possibly undefined macro:
>>> AC_PACKAGE_NEED_ATTRIBUTES_H
>>> configure.ac:50: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PACKAGE_WANT_NDBM
>>> configure.ac:51: error: possibly undefined macro:
>>> AC_PACKAGE_NEED_IRIX_LIBHANDLE
>>> configure.ac:56: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_MULTILIB
>>> configure.ac:57: error: possibly undefined macro:
>>> AC_PACKAGE_NEED_XFS_XFS_H
>>> configure.ac:58: error: possibly undefined macro:
>>> AC_PACKAGE_WANT_LIBXFS_H
>>> configure.ac:59: error: possibly undefined macro:
>>> AC_PACKAGE_WANT_XLOG_ASSIGN_LSN
>>> configure.ac:60: error: possibly undefined macro:
>>> AC_PACKAGE_NEED_XFS_XQM_H
>>> configure.ac:61: error: possibly undefined macro:
>>> AC_PACKAGE_NEED_XFSCTL_MACRO
>>> configure.ac:62: error: possibly undefined macro:
>>> AC_PACKAGE_NEED_XFS_HANDLE_H
>>> configure.ac:64: error: possibly undefined macro:
>>> AC_PACKAGE_NEED_ATTRLIST_LIBHANDLE
>>> configure.ac:65: error: possibly undefined macro:
>>> AC_PACKAGE_NEED_ATTR_XATTR_H
>>> configure.ac:67: error: possibly undefined macro:
>>> AC_PACKAGE_WANT_ATTRLIST_LIBATTR
>>> configure.ac:68: error: possibly undefined macro:
>>> AC_PACKAGE_NEED_GETXATTR_LIBATTR
>>> configure.ac:71: error: possibly undefined macro:
>>> AC_PACKAGE_NEED_ACL_LIBACL_H
>>> configure.ac:72: error: possibly undefined macro:
>>> AC_PACKAGE_NEED_ACLINIT_LIBACL
>>> configure.ac:74: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PACKAGE_WANT_GDBM
>>> configure.ac:75: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PACKAGE_WANT_AIO
>>> configure.ac:76: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PACKAGE_WANT_DMAPI
>>> configure.ac:82: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PACKAGE_WANT_SSL
>>> autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1
>>> make: *** [configure] Error 1
>>> [root@RHEL6U9GA_Intel64 xfstests]# uname -r
>>> 2.6.32-696.el6.x86_64
>>> [root@RHEL6U9GA_Intel64 ~]# rpm -q automake autoconf m4 libtool
>>> automake-1.11.1-4.el6.noarch
>>> autoconf-2.63-5.1.el6.noarch
>>> m4-1.4.13-5.el6.x86_64
>>> libtool-2.2.6-15.5.el6.x86_64
>>> ============================================================================
>>>
>>>
>>> autoreconf with --include m4 may not fix undefined macro on RHEL6.9GA,
>>> do you have the same issue?
>> No, make works fine on my RHEL6.9 host. And this patch should be pushed
>> to upstream already. Does 'make realclean' make any difference? Does a
>> clean 'git clone' work for you?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eryu
>>
>>
> Hi Eryu and Gwendal,
>
> I found that autoreconf could not pass -I/--include option to aclocal
> in autoconf-2.63-5.1.el6.noarch on RHEL6.9GA.
> This bug has been fixed by the following patch:
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=autoconf.git;a=commit;h=44fbeef86d03f2b754a4444e38f38631ad318946
>
>
> This fixed patch was not merged into autoconf-2.63-5.1.el6.noarch. I
> tried to apply this patch into autoconf-2.63-5.1.el6.noarch,
> so make worked fine in xfstests on RHEL6.9GA. How can we workaroud
> this issue?
>
> Thanks,
> Xiao Yang
>> .
>>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-12 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAMHSBOXjP4QOGmM2HxygY0r+ML93XyEmLEfwGz6KvS0S0sjuCA@mail.gmail.com>
2017-03-24 23:48 ` [PATCH v2] Code to allow cros-compilation on chromeOS Gwendal Grignou
2017-03-27 11:35 ` Eryu Guan
2017-04-04 17:37 ` [PATCH v3] " Gwendal Grignou
2017-04-06 11:18 ` Eryu Guan
2017-04-06 23:26 ` Gwendal Grignou
2017-04-07 4:12 ` Eryu Guan
2017-04-07 21:41 ` Gwendal Grignou
2017-04-10 9:25 ` Eryu Guan
2017-04-19 21:59 ` Gwendal Grignou
2017-04-19 23:33 ` [PATCH v4] " Gwendal Grignou
2017-04-25 13:09 ` Eryu Guan
2017-05-08 10:19 ` Xiao Yang
2017-05-08 10:50 ` Eryu Guan
2017-05-08 11:19 ` Xiao Yang
2017-05-08 21:22 ` Gwendal Grignou
2017-05-09 1:37 ` Xiao Yang
2017-05-09 7:12 ` Xiao Yang
2017-05-12 6:04 ` Xiao Yang [this message]
2017-05-12 8:12 ` Eryu Guan
2017-04-28 16:27 ` [PATCH v5] " Gwendal Grignou
2017-04-28 16:58 ` Gwendal Grignou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59155058.4070200@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox