From: Chris Frey <cdfrey@foursquare.net>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: multiple-commit cherry-pick?
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:08:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081114050822.GA23963@foursquare.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0811102230330.30769@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:31:32PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Alex Riesen wrote:
> > for cs in HEAD^..HEAD HEAD~10; do
> > case "$cs"; in
> > *..*)
> > git format-patch --stdout "$cs"
> > ;;
> > *)
> > git show --pretty=email "$cs"
> > ;;
> > esac
> > done
> >
> > At least, this is what I have in mind and how I expect it to work.
>
> That is not the way git-show is implemented (it uses setup_revisions() to
> check for validity and to parse the arguments), and I cannot think of any
> way to make this work without ugly workarounds.
Would it be possible to add "range" support to a subset of commands by
using a git-range wrapper?
Hypothetical, pie-in-the-sky idea:
git range HEAD^..HEAD HEAD~10 -- show --pretty=email
git range HEAD^..HEAD HEAD~10 -- log
git range HEAD^..HEAD HEAD~10 -- cherry-pick
Which would call the given command for each of the commits found in all
the specified ranges and lists. git-range could have an internal list
of supported git subcommands that it would massage the parameter lists for.
I find this both elegant and ugly at the same time. :-)
- Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-14 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-06 2:45 multiple-commit cherry-pick? Miles Bader
2008-11-06 3:24 ` Deskin Miller
2008-11-06 9:51 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-11-06 12:14 ` Miles Bader
2008-11-06 12:26 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-11-07 5:09 ` Miles Bader
2008-11-07 11:03 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-11-07 11:46 ` Miles Bader
2008-11-06 21:37 ` Alex Riesen
2008-11-07 3:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-11-07 4:38 ` Miles Bader
2008-11-07 7:13 ` Alex Riesen
2008-11-07 5:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-07 7:12 ` Alex Riesen
2008-11-07 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-11-09 10:25 ` Alex Riesen
2008-11-10 19:58 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-10 20:24 ` Alex Riesen
2008-11-10 21:31 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-14 5:08 ` Chris Frey [this message]
2008-11-14 14:00 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-14 16:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-11-14 16:59 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-14 17:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-14 17:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-11-14 17:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-11-16 9:11 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-14 18:38 ` Francis Galiegue
2008-11-10 20:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-10 21:34 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-07 10:46 ` Michael Radziej
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081114050822.GA23963@foursquare.net \
--to=cdfrey@foursquare.net \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=miles@gnu.org \
--cc=raa.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox