Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Miles Bader" <miles@gnu.org>
To: "Björn Steinbrink" <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Cc: "Deskin Miller" <deskinm@umich.edu>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: multiple-commit cherry-pick?
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 20:46:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc339e4a0811070346k69c302bdnfcb59adf0036b5ea@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081107110331.GA2938@atjola.homenet>

>> >> > git reset --hard C
>> >> > git rebase --onto ORIG_HEAD A^

>> Hmm, I guess using rebase --abort isn't a very good idea in this case
>> though... :-/
>
> Why not? I mean, ok, you end up at C, and not where you have been before
> the reset --hard, but there's the reflog to help you get back to
> whatever previous state of the branch it is that you want.

I just mean it's not a trivial way to get back to the state before the
multi-cherry-pick -- you need to know the details of what's going on,
and handle the rest of the cleanup manually.

So, for instance, if you were to package up the above commands in a
shell script, the abort issue is one of those rough edges which would
prevent it from being as convenient as a real git command.  [A
hypothetical extension of the cherry-pick command to handle multiple
commits would presumably offer a "cherry-pick --abort" option that did
everything magically.]

-Miles

-- 
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-07 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-06  2:45 multiple-commit cherry-pick? Miles Bader
2008-11-06  3:24 ` Deskin Miller
2008-11-06  9:51   ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-11-06 12:14     ` Miles Bader
2008-11-06 12:26       ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-11-07  5:09         ` Miles Bader
2008-11-07 11:03           ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-11-07 11:46             ` Miles Bader [this message]
2008-11-06 21:37 ` Alex Riesen
2008-11-07  3:29   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-11-07  4:38     ` Miles Bader
2008-11-07  7:13       ` Alex Riesen
2008-11-07  5:00     ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-07  7:12       ` Alex Riesen
2008-11-07 18:08         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-11-09 10:25           ` Alex Riesen
2008-11-10 19:58             ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-10 20:24               ` Alex Riesen
2008-11-10 21:31                 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-14  5:08                   ` Chris Frey
2008-11-14 14:00                     ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-14 16:11                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-11-14 16:59                       ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-14 17:29                       ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-14 17:41                         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-11-14 17:55                           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-11-16  9:11                             ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-14 18:38                       ` Francis Galiegue
2008-11-10 20:41               ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-10 21:34                 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-07 10:46       ` Michael Radziej

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fc339e4a0811070346k69c302bdnfcb59adf0036b5ea@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=miles@gnu.org \
    --cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
    --cc=deskinm@umich.edu \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox