* Re: vcs-svn and firends
[not found] ` <CA+gfSn9TU1mfAifL=1CDdq_cz7M7BgNLDuPAtzbMSf04WB-K3w@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2011-09-15 17:45 ` Jonathan Nieder
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jonathan Nieder @ 2011-09-15 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Ivankov; +Cc: David Michael Barr, git
Dmitry Ivankov wrote:
> A very quick view suggests that they could be reorganized, if it's okay.
> For example:
> - squash optifying REPORT_FILENO with it's addition.
> - drop changes to repo_tree.c that were later erased
> ...I bet there are more
>
> Does it make sense or we should better not rewrite the history?
All else being equal, it is better not to rewrite history, especially
when there are multiple series building on a commit (as is the case
for most commits in the
git://repo.or.cz/git/jrn.git svn-fe
branch, just like Junio's "master" branch).
Cheers,
Jonathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread