Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian Noé Ramos López" <chris@nortesoftware.dev>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>,
	Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpg-interface: fail when the ssh revocation file is missing
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 18:25:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261113232552.1325109-1-chris@nortesoftware.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa4o6oq1y.fsf@gitster.g>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> By the way, it is not a problem this patch introduces, but the
> comment at the end of this block is a bit misleading.

Agreed. v3 replaces it with one comment at the top of the block,
which says check-novalidate runs there only to display the signature
info.

> I wonder if we should be able to somehow fold this into the earlier
> "if()" block, making it the single place that deals with failures?

Yes, that is better, and v3 does it: with the file missing, a known
key gets the error and then its signature info, as an unknown key
does, and %G? gives "U" for both.

v2 went out as a reply to this message instead of to v1; v3 will be
a reply to v1.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-13 23:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-08  6:56 ssh signing: valid-before is checked at the signer's own date, and a missing revocationFile fails open Christian Noé Ramos López
2026-10-08 13:42 ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-09 12:19   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-09 13:30     ` Phillip Wood
     [not found]   ` <CAHGSfba9Td+Lg=Nf+nfwZY2r1_eq2Mcejn__6X=VPQkmcJttfQ@mail.gmail.com>
2026-10-09 13:29     ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-21  3:03   ` [PATCH] doc: gpg: say which date SSH key lifetimes are checked against Christian Noé Ramos López
2026-10-21 18:14     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-22  5:44       ` [PATCH v2] " Christian Noé Ramos López
2026-10-22  6:25       ` [PATCH] " Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-22 16:45         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-30  6:12           ` Christian Noé Ramos López
2026-10-30  6:15     ` [PATCH v3] " Christian Noé Ramos López
2026-10-30  7:40       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-21  4:17   ` [PATCH] gpg-interface: fail when the ssh revocation file is missing Christian Noé Ramos López
2026-10-21 18:40     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-22  5:46       ` [PATCH v2] " Christian Noé Ramos López
2026-10-22 15:56         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-11-13 23:25       ` Christian Noé Ramos López [this message]
2026-11-13 23:28     ` [PATCH v3] " Christian Noé Ramos López

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261113232552.1325109-1-chris@nortesoftware.dev \
    --to=chris@nortesoftware.dev \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox