Re: [PATCH v2] remote.c: defer remote.<name>.followRemoteHEAD validation

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

"Matt Hunter" <m@lfurio.us> writes:

> On Thu Nov 5, 2026 at 11:03 PM EST, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>> Hmph, interesting.  Can you rewrite Colin's patch using this, and
>> then merge the result into 'seen' (after reverting Colin's topic
>> ch/remote-defer-follow-remote-head-validation from 'seen' first) to
>> see how badly it crashes with other topics in flight?
>
> I still have the commit sitting around.  I tried this and a replay of
> the current topic to compare -- the conflict is the same in both
> cases.  eg: Nothing else in flight is touching the
> get_follow_remote_head() function.

Thanks for investigating.  

Your approach of passing more context into get_follow_remote_head()
and have _it_ do the (lazy) conversion from string to value makes it
much easier for callers to make calls from multiple branches to the
function, because the need to "set-up" to make the call disappears.

Very cleanly done.

Colin, what's your preference?  Can we move this topic past the
finish line?

Thanks.