Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: Grayson Gordon <graysongordon1@gmail.com>,
	 git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net,  avarab@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] http: add http.sslVerifyStatus to check stapled OCSP responses
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 07:16:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqik4qz86h.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <apUlqvXgChMeCUkp@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:56:42 +0200")

Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:

>> They do look involved but seem to cover the situations we do care
>> about, except we seem not to test when the server does not explicitly
>> say "this is still good", or am I not reading the tests correctly?
>
> Isn't the following test covering that scenario? Or am I misreading?
>
>     test_expect_success SSL_VERIFYSTATUS 'fetch succeeds with stapled "good" OCSP response'
>            with_ssl_verification git -c http.sslVerifyStatus=true \
>                    ls-remote "$HTTPD_URL/smart/repo.git" >actual &&
>            test_line_count -gt 0 actual
>     '

Probably I misstated.  What I meant was a reaction to "fail close"
floated earlier.  A server does not explicitly give stapled good,
and the client says "this is not known-good" and not talking to it.
I.e. 'fetch fails without stapled "good"'

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-31 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-11 17:02 [PATCH] http: add http.sslVerifyStatus to check stapled OCSP responses graysongordon-gl
2026-08-11 19:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-11 20:44 ` [PATCH v2] " graysongordon-gl
2026-08-12  6:25   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-12 15:53     ` Grayson Gordon
2026-08-12 14:17   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-12 18:25     ` [PATCH v3] " graysongordon-gl
2026-08-12 21:34       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-13 16:06         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-17 18:52           ` [PATCH v4] " graysongordon-gl
2026-08-17 19:19             ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-18  7:50             ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-18 14:51               ` Grayson Gordon
2026-08-19  8:14                 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-18 16:40               ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-18 19:37           ` [PATCH v5] " graysongordon-gl
2026-08-18 20:12             ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-18 21:22               ` Grayson Gordon
2026-08-18 21:48           ` [PATCH v6] " graysongordon-gl
2026-08-26 22:01             ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-28 13:51               ` Grayson Gordon
2026-08-28 17:20                 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-31  6:56                   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-31 14:16                     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-08-31 14:24                       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-31 14:31                         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-08 12:55                           ` Grayson Gordon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqik4qz86h.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=graysongordon1@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox