Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] ci: drop unused "linux-clang" logic

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:

>> I would consider resurrecting the no-rust job is in the same spirit
>> as 8/8 to ensure test coverage for reftable by shuffling jobs
>> around.  I do not mind seeing it done separately, but it is not too
>> big an effort to throw it into the feature testbed or linux32 job
>> just to make sure the system builds without rust, and doing so now
>> would mean we won't forget.  And it is only until rust becomes
>> required anyway.
>
> It's not, but I've already got a subsequent patch series anyway where
> I'm following up on some of the related topics that were raised in this
> thread. I've queued the change as part of that follow-up.

Thanks.  Knowing future plans always helps.