From: "Javier Martín" <lordhabbit@gmail.com>
To: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: grub-probe detects ext4 wronly as ext2
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:41:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1215204095.26019.142.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080704185723.GB32625@thorin>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2550 bytes --]
OK, I've addressed all your concerns and here is a new version of the
patch. With it, the delta-size of the compiled ext2.mod against a
completely unpatched one is just 148 bytes.
El vie, 04-07-2008 a las 20:57 +0200, Robert Millan escribió:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:45:02PM +0200, Javier Martín wrote:
> >
> > By the way, I'm already using SVN (and thus svn diff) for this patch. Is
> > that right? Was the migration completed already?
>
> Yep.
Wonderful! I was sick of jumping through hoops with cvs diff.
> I'd suggest making the "RW compatible" etc notes a bit more ellaborate to make
> it clear what they mean (I'm confused myself).
Done, though now I might have over-elaborated
> > +/* The set of back-incompatible features this driver DOES support. Add (OR)
> > + * flags here as the related features are implemented into the driver */
> > +#define EXT2_DRIVER_SUPPORTED_INCOMPAT ( EXT2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FILETYPE )
>
> I suppose we'll want to have EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENTS here, now that it's
> been implemented (Bean just sent a patch, which will probably be merged first).
Done too and checked that ext4 filesystems w/o other incompatible
features like 64BIT are now recognized (though I did not check reading
since I haven't yet applied Bean's patch to my tree).
> > +/* The set of back-incompatible features this driver DOES NOT support but are
> > + * ignored for some hackish reason. Flags here should be here _temporarily_!
> > + * Remember that INCOMPAT_* features are so for a reason! */
> > +#define EXT2_DRIVER_IGNORED_INCOMPAT ( EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER )
>
> Instead of this can we have an explanation of what EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER
> is doing here? I think the reason was that our code for this feature wasn't
> as mature as it should be, and it appears that not handling it brings better
> results in the short term.
Done - explained why RECOVER is ignored even though it's "incompatible"
> Since we know which one applies, why not tell grub_error about it? We could
> leave the "not an ext2 filesystem" call unmodified and add another one for
> this particular error.
>
I may have overstepped a bit, but I've thought it more sensible to
replace all "goto fail;"s for calls to a new macro MOUNT_FAIL taking a
string argument which is saved in the new variable err_msg, and then
jumps to fail which shows _that_ message instead of the old one. Then, I
wrote informative messages for each error condition instead of just "not
an ext2 filesystem".
[-- Attachment #1.2: ext2_incompat.patch.3 --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 4718 bytes --]
Index: fs/ext2.c
===================================================================
--- fs/ext2.c (revisión: 1691)
+++ fs/ext2.c (copia de trabajo)
@@ -71,8 +71,53 @@
? EXT2_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE \
: grub_le_to_cpu16 (data->sblock.inode_size))
-#define EXT3_FEATURE_COMPAT_HAS_JOURNAL 0x0004
+/* Superblock filesystem feature flags (RW compatible)
+ * A filesystem with any of these enabled can be read and written by a driver
+ * that does not understand them without causing metadata/data corruption */
+#define EXT2_FEATURE_COMPAT_DIR_PREALLOC 0x0001
+#define EXT2_FEATURE_COMPAT_IMAGIC_INODES 0x0002
+#define EXT3_FEATURE_COMPAT_HAS_JOURNAL 0x0004
+#define EXT2_FEATURE_COMPAT_EXT_ATTR 0x0008
+#define EXT2_FEATURE_COMPAT_RESIZE_INODE 0x0010
+#define EXT2_FEATURE_COMPAT_DIR_INDEX 0x0020
+/* Superblock filesystem feature flags (RO compatible)
+ * A filesystem with any of these enabled can be safely read by a driver that
+ * does not understand them, but should not be written to, usually because
+ * additional metadata is required */
+#define EXT2_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_SPARSE_SUPER 0x0001
+#define EXT2_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_LARGE_FILE 0x0002
+#define EXT2_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_BTREE_DIR 0x0004
+#define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_GDT_CSUM 0x0010
+#define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_DIR_NLINK 0x0020
+#define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE 0x0040
+/* Superblock filesystem feature flags (back-incompatible)
+ * A filesystem with any of these enabled should not be attempted to be read
+ * by a driver that does not understand them, since they usually indicate
+ * metadata format changes that might confuse the reader. */
+#define EXT2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_COMPRESSION 0x0001
+#define EXT2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FILETYPE 0x0002
+#define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER 0x0004 /* Needs recovery */
+#define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_JOURNAL_DEV 0x0008 /* Volume is journal device */
+#define EXT2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG 0x0010
+#define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENTS 0x0040 /* Extents used */
+#define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT 0x0080
+#define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FLEX_BG 0x0200
+/* The set of back-incompatible features this driver DOES support. Add (OR)
+ * flags here as the related features are implemented into the driver */
+#define EXT2_DRIVER_SUPPORTED_INCOMPAT ( EXT2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FILETYPE \
+ | EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENTS )
+/* List of rationales for the ignored "incompatible" features:
+ * needs_recovery: Not really back-incompatible - was added as such to forbid
+ * ext2 drivers from mounting an ext3 volume with a dirty
+ * journal because they will ignore the journal, but the next
+ * ext3 driver to mount the volume will find the journal and
+ * replay it, potentially corrupting the metadata written by
+ * the ext2 drivers
+ */
+#define EXT2_DRIVER_IGNORED_INCOMPAT ( EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER )
+
+
#define EXT3_JOURNAL_MAGIC_NUMBER 0xc03b3998U
#define EXT3_JOURNAL_DESCRIPTOR_BLOCK 1
@@ -375,10 +420,12 @@
return 0;
}
+#define EXT2_DRIVER_MOUNT_FAIL(message) { err_msg = (message); goto fail; }
static struct grub_ext2_data *
grub_ext2_mount (grub_disk_t disk)
{
struct grub_ext2_data *data;
+ const char *err_msg = 0;
data = grub_malloc (sizeof (struct grub_ext2_data));
if (!data)
@@ -388,12 +435,18 @@
grub_disk_read (disk, 1 * 2, 0, sizeof (struct grub_ext2_sblock),
(char *) &data->sblock);
if (grub_errno)
- goto fail;
+ EXT2_DRIVER_MOUNT_FAIL("could not read the superblock")
/* Make sure this is an ext2 filesystem. */
if (grub_le_to_cpu16 (data->sblock.magic) != EXT2_MAGIC)
- goto fail;
+ EXT2_DRIVER_MOUNT_FAIL("not an ext2 filesystem (superblock magic mismatch)")
+ /* Check the FS doesn't have feature bits enabled that we don't support. */
+ if (grub_le_to_cpu32 (data->sblock.feature_incompat)
+ & ~(EXT2_DRIVER_SUPPORTED_INCOMPAT | EXT2_DRIVER_IGNORED_INCOMPAT))
+ EXT2_DRIVER_MOUNT_FAIL("filesystem has unsupported incompatible features")
+
+
data->disk = disk;
data->diropen.data = data;
@@ -404,12 +457,14 @@
grub_ext2_read_inode (data, 2, data->inode);
if (grub_errno)
- goto fail;
+ EXT2_DRIVER_MOUNT_FAIL("could not read the root directory inode")
return data;
fail:
- grub_error (GRUB_ERR_BAD_FS, "not an ext2 filesystem");
+ if (!err_msg)
+ err_msg = "DEBUG: mount failed but no error message supplied!";
+ grub_error (GRUB_ERR_BAD_FS, err_msg);
grub_free (data);
return 0;
}
[-- Attachment #2: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-04 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-29 18:11 grub-probe detects ext4 wronly as ext2 Felix Zielcke
2008-06-29 18:46 ` Javier Martín
2008-06-29 19:17 ` Bean
2008-06-29 19:53 ` Javier Martín
2008-06-29 21:19 ` Robert Millan
2008-06-30 3:02 ` Javier Martín
2008-06-30 7:10 ` Felix Zielcke
2008-06-30 11:14 ` Isaac Dupree
2008-06-30 12:12 ` Javier Martín
2008-06-30 12:27 ` Bean
2008-06-30 12:43 ` Javier Martín
2008-07-01 16:08 ` Robert Millan
2008-07-01 16:25 ` Pavel Roskin
2008-07-01 18:42 ` Javier Martín
2008-07-01 19:01 ` Pavel Roskin
2008-07-01 20:48 ` Robert Millan
2008-07-01 23:05 ` Javier Martín
2008-07-01 23:28 ` Javier Martín
2008-07-02 14:22 ` Robert Millan
2008-07-02 16:03 ` Pavel Roskin
2008-07-02 19:32 ` Javier Martín
2008-07-03 14:02 ` Robert Millan
2008-07-03 14:21 ` Isaac Dupree
2008-07-03 17:07 ` Javier Martín
2008-07-04 0:08 ` Robert Millan
2008-07-04 1:20 ` Javier Martín
2008-08-05 17:23 ` Felix Zielcke
2008-08-06 10:36 ` Felix Zielcke
2008-08-11 0:35 ` Javier Martín
2008-08-11 7:56 ` Felix Zielcke
2008-07-04 1:32 ` Javier Martín
2008-07-04 6:49 ` Bean
2008-07-04 8:33 ` Felix Zielcke
2008-07-04 10:34 ` Javier Martín
2008-07-04 11:29 ` Bean
2008-07-04 12:00 ` Javier Martín
2008-07-04 14:09 ` Robert Millan
2008-07-04 14:33 ` Javier Martín
2008-07-04 14:11 ` Bean
2008-07-04 14:34 ` Javier Martín
2008-07-04 14:04 ` Robert Millan
2008-07-04 14:23 ` Robert Millan
2008-07-04 14:21 ` Robert Millan
2008-07-04 14:45 ` Javier Martín
2008-07-04 18:57 ` Robert Millan
2008-07-04 20:41 ` Javier Martín [this message]
2008-07-05 12:07 ` Robert Millan
2008-07-05 18:36 ` Javier Martín
2008-07-16 15:09 ` Javier Martín
2008-07-16 15:27 ` Felix Zielcke
2008-07-16 16:38 ` Javier Martín
2008-07-16 17:13 ` Felix Zielcke
2008-07-16 17:21 ` Felix Zielcke
2008-07-16 17:44 ` Felix Zielcke
2008-07-16 19:07 ` Javier Martín
2008-07-16 19:33 ` Felix Zielcke
2008-07-19 14:27 ` Robert Millan
2008-08-11 14:14 ` Javier Martín
2008-08-27 13:58 ` Felix Zielcke
2008-08-30 11:17 ` Robert Millan
2008-08-30 21:28 ` Javier Martín
2008-09-24 17:05 ` Javier Martín
2009-02-04 7:41 ` Felix Zielcke
2009-02-04 13:08 ` Javier Martín
2009-02-07 19:30 ` Felix Zielcke
2009-02-07 23:54 ` Javier Martín
2009-02-08 0:28 ` Robert Millan
2008-07-01 16:03 ` Robert Millan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1215204095.26019.142.camel@localhost \
--to=lordhabbit@gmail.com \
--cc=grub-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox