From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>, IGT dev <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH v17 7/7] test: perf_pmu: use the gem_engine_topology library
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 09:50:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0649f1fc-bb78-9c42-d17a-7ecb6b2c821d@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190405010737.19111-8-andi@etezian.org>
On 05/04/2019 02:07, Andi Shyti wrote:
> From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
>
> Replace the legacy for_each_engine* defines with the ones
> implemented in the gem_engine_topology library.
>
> Use whenever possible gem_engine_can_store_dword() that checks
> class instead of flags.
>
> Now the __for_each_engine_class_instance and
> for_each_engine_class_instance are unused, remove them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> lib/igt_gt.h | 7 -------
> tests/perf_pmu.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/igt_gt.h b/lib/igt_gt.h
> index af4cc38a1ef7..c2ca07e03738 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_gt.h
> +++ b/lib/igt_gt.h
> @@ -119,11 +119,4 @@ void gem_require_engine(int gem_fd,
> igt_require(gem_has_engine(gem_fd, class, instance));
> }
>
> -#define __for_each_engine_class_instance(e__) \
> - for ((e__) = intel_execution_engines2; (e__)->name; (e__)++)
> -
> -#define for_each_engine_class_instance(fd__, e__) \
> - for ((e__) = intel_execution_engines2; (e__)->name; (e__)++) \
> - for_if (gem_has_engine((fd__), (e__)->class, (e__)->instance))
> -
> #endif /* IGT_GT_H */
> diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> index 4f552bc2ae28..c954a0d54b72 100644
> --- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
> +++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> @@ -158,11 +158,6 @@ static unsigned int measured_usleep(unsigned int usec)
> return igt_nsec_elapsed(&ts);
> }
>
> -static unsigned int e2ring(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
> -{
> - return gem_class_instance_to_eb_flags(gem_fd, e->class, e->instance);
> -}
> -
> #define TEST_BUSY (1)
> #define FLAG_SYNC (2)
> #define TEST_TRAILING_IDLE (4)
> @@ -177,7 +172,7 @@ static igt_spin_t * __spin_poll(int fd, uint32_t ctx, unsigned long flags)
> .engine = flags,
> };
>
> - if (gem_can_store_dword(fd, flags))
> + if (gem_class_can_store_dword(fd, flags))
flags is not a class here but either legacy eb flags or engine map index.
I think you can refactor so this function (and the chain of callers)
takes a pointer to intel_execution_engine2 and then use class and flags
as needed.
The rest looks okay on a quick read through.
Regards,
Tvrtko
> opts.flags |= IGT_SPIN_POLL_RUN;
>
> return __igt_spin_batch_factory(fd, &opts);
> @@ -267,7 +262,7 @@ single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
> fd = open_pmu(I915_PMU_ENGINE_BUSY(e->class, e->instance));
>
> if (flags & TEST_BUSY)
> - spin = spin_sync(gem_fd, 0, e2ring(gem_fd, e));
> + spin = spin_sync(gem_fd, 0, e->flags);
> else
> spin = NULL;
>
> @@ -316,7 +311,7 @@ busy_start(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
> */
> sleep(2);
>
> - spin = __spin_sync(gem_fd, 0, e2ring(gem_fd, e));
> + spin = __spin_sync(gem_fd, 0, e->flags);
>
> fd = open_pmu(I915_PMU_ENGINE_BUSY(e->class, e->instance));
>
> @@ -359,11 +354,11 @@ busy_double_start(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
> * re-submission in execlists mode. Make sure busyness is correctly
> * reported with the engine busy, and after the engine went idle.
> */
> - spin[0] = __spin_sync(gem_fd, 0, e2ring(gem_fd, e));
> + spin[0] = __spin_sync(gem_fd, 0, e->flags);
> usleep(500e3);
> spin[1] = __igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd,
> .ctx = ctx,
> - .engine = e2ring(gem_fd, e));
> + .engine = e->flags);
>
> /*
> * Open PMU as fast as possible after the second spin batch in attempt
> @@ -434,8 +429,8 @@ busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
>
> i = 0;
> fd[0] = -1;
> - for_each_engine_class_instance(gem_fd, e_) {
> - if (e == e_)
> + __for_each_physical_engine(gem_fd, e_) {
> + if (e->class == e_->class && e->instance == e_->instance)
> busy_idx = i;
>
> fd[i++] = open_group(I915_PMU_ENGINE_BUSY(e_->class,
> @@ -445,7 +440,7 @@ busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
>
> igt_assert_eq(i, num_engines);
>
> - spin = spin_sync(gem_fd, 0, e2ring(gem_fd, e));
> + spin = spin_sync(gem_fd, 0, e->flags);
> pmu_read_multi(fd[0], num_engines, tval[0]);
> slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
> if (flags & TEST_TRAILING_IDLE)
> @@ -478,7 +473,7 @@ __submit_spin_batch(int gem_fd, igt_spin_t *spin,
> struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb = spin->execbuf;
>
> eb.flags &= ~(0x3f | I915_EXEC_BSD_MASK);
> - eb.flags |= e2ring(gem_fd, e) | I915_EXEC_NO_RELOC;
> + eb.flags |= e->flags | I915_EXEC_NO_RELOC;
> eb.batch_start_offset += offset;
>
> gem_execbuf(gem_fd, &eb);
> @@ -497,13 +492,13 @@ most_busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
> unsigned int idle_idx, i;
>
> i = 0;
> - for_each_engine_class_instance(gem_fd, e_) {
> - if (e == e_)
> + __for_each_physical_engine(gem_fd, e_) {
> + if (e->class == e_->class && e->instance == e_->instance)
> idle_idx = i;
> else if (spin)
> __submit_spin_batch(gem_fd, spin, e_, 64);
> else
> - spin = __spin_poll(gem_fd, 0, e2ring(gem_fd, e_));
> + spin = __spin_poll(gem_fd, 0, e->flags);
>
> val[i++] = I915_PMU_ENGINE_BUSY(e_->class, e_->instance);
> }
> @@ -554,11 +549,11 @@ all_busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const unsigned int num_engines,
> unsigned int i;
>
> i = 0;
> - for_each_engine_class_instance(gem_fd, e) {
> + __for_each_physical_engine(gem_fd, e) {
> if (spin)
> __submit_spin_batch(gem_fd, spin, e, 64);
> else
> - spin = __spin_poll(gem_fd, 0, e2ring(gem_fd, e));
> + spin = __spin_poll(gem_fd, 0, e->flags);
>
> val[i++] = I915_PMU_ENGINE_BUSY(e->class, e->instance);
> }
> @@ -602,7 +597,7 @@ no_sema(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
> open_group(I915_PMU_ENGINE_WAIT(e->class, e->instance), fd);
>
> if (flags & TEST_BUSY)
> - spin = spin_sync(gem_fd, 0, e2ring(gem_fd, e));
> + spin = spin_sync(gem_fd, 0, e->flags);
> else
> spin = NULL;
>
> @@ -689,7 +684,7 @@ sema_wait(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
>
> eb.buffer_count = 2;
> eb.buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(obj);
> - eb.flags = e2ring(gem_fd, e);
> + eb.flags = e->flags;
>
> /**
> * Start the semaphore wait PMU and after some known time let the above
> @@ -845,7 +840,7 @@ event_wait(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
>
> eb.buffer_count = 1;
> eb.buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj);
> - eb.flags = e2ring(gem_fd, e) | I915_EXEC_SECURE;
> + eb.flags = e->flags | I915_EXEC_SECURE;
>
> for_each_pipe_with_valid_output(&data.display, p, output) {
> struct igt_helper_process waiter = { };
> @@ -936,7 +931,7 @@ multi_client(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
> */
> fd[1] = open_pmu(config);
>
> - spin = spin_sync(gem_fd, 0, e2ring(gem_fd, e));
> + spin = spin_sync(gem_fd, 0, e->flags);
>
> val[0] = val[1] = __pmu_read_single(fd[0], &ts[0]);
> slept[1] = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
> @@ -1465,7 +1460,7 @@ test_enable_race(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
>
> eb.buffer_count = 1;
> eb.buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj);
> - eb.flags = e2ring(gem_fd, e);
> + eb.flags = e->flags;
>
> /*
> * This test is probabilistic so run in a few times to increase the
> @@ -1570,7 +1565,7 @@ accuracy(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
> igt_spin_t *spin;
>
> /* Allocate our spin batch and idle it. */
> - spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, .engine = e2ring(gem_fd, e));
> + spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, .engine = e->flags);
> igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
> gem_sync(gem_fd, spin->handle);
>
> @@ -1674,7 +1669,7 @@ igt_main
> I915_PMU_LAST - __I915_PMU_OTHER(0) + 1;
> unsigned int num_engines = 0;
> int fd = -1;
> - const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e;
> + struct intel_execution_engine2 *e;
> unsigned int i;
>
> igt_fixture {
> @@ -1683,7 +1678,7 @@ igt_main
> igt_require_gem(fd);
> igt_require(i915_type_id() > 0);
>
> - for_each_engine_class_instance(fd, e)
> + __for_each_physical_engine(fd, e)
> num_engines++;
> }
>
> @@ -1693,7 +1688,7 @@ igt_main
> igt_subtest("invalid-init")
> invalid_init();
>
> - __for_each_engine_class_instance(e) {
> + __for_each_physical_engine(fd, e) {
> const unsigned int pct[] = { 2, 50, 98 };
>
> /**
> @@ -1897,7 +1892,7 @@ igt_main
> gem_quiescent_gpu(fd);
> }
>
> - __for_each_engine_class_instance(e) {
> + __for_each_physical_engine(fd, e) {
> igt_subtest_group {
> igt_fixture {
> gem_require_engine(render_fd,
>
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-05 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-05 1:07 [igt-dev] [PATCH v17 0/7] new engine discovery interface Andi Shyti
2019-04-05 1:07 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v17 1/7] lib/igt_gt: remove unnecessary argument Andi Shyti
2019-04-05 14:43 ` Caz Yokoyama
2019-04-05 1:07 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v17 2/7] lib: ioctl_wrappers: reach engines by index as well Andi Shyti
2019-04-05 7:59 ` Chris Wilson
2019-04-05 8:35 ` Andi Shyti
2019-04-05 1:07 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v17 3/7] include/drm-uapi: import i915_drm.h header file Andi Shyti
2019-04-05 1:07 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v17 4/7] lib/i915: add gem_engine_topology library and for_each loop definition Andi Shyti
2019-04-05 8:42 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-05 9:00 ` Andi Shyti
2019-04-05 9:16 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-05 1:07 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v17 5/7] lib: igt_gt: add eb flags to class helper Andi Shyti
2019-04-05 1:07 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v17 6/7] lib: igt_gt: make gem_engine_can_store_dword() check engine class Andi Shyti
2019-04-05 1:07 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v17 7/7] test: perf_pmu: use the gem_engine_topology library Andi Shyti
2019-04-05 8:50 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2019-04-05 9:09 ` Andi Shyti
2019-04-05 9:22 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-05 2:06 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v17,1/7] lib/igt_gt: remove unnecessary argument Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0649f1fc-bb78-9c42-d17a-7ecb6b2c821d@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@etezian.org \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox