Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v3 09/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Use enum with expected load
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 16:56:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c57cfcc-844a-4508-a302-bf6fc99b7670@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240827165449.1706784-10-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>


On 8/27/2024 6:54 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Do not let the execution flag dictate the result check, but rather be
> explicit what's being checked: idle or full load.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das<nirmoy.das@intel.com>

> ---
>   tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo.c b/tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo.c
> index 23edeea40..d45e45c6b 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Read and verify drm client memory consumption and engine u
>   #define TEST_TRAILING_IDLE	(1 << 1)
>   #define TEST_ISOLATION		(1 << 2)
>   
> +enum expected_load {
> +	EXPECTED_LOAD_IDLE,
> +	EXPECTED_LOAD_FULL,
> +};
> +
>   struct pceu_cycles {
>   	uint64_t cycles;
>   	uint64_t total_cycles;
> @@ -471,7 +476,7 @@ spin_ctx_destroy(int fd, struct spin_ctx *ctx)
>   
>   static void
>   check_results(struct pceu_cycles *s1, struct pceu_cycles *s2,
> -	      int class, unsigned int flags)
> +	      int class, enum expected_load expected_load)
>   {
>   	double percent;
>   	u64 den, num;
> @@ -487,11 +492,18 @@ check_results(struct pceu_cycles *s1, struct pceu_cycles *s2,
>   
>   	igt_debug("%s: percent: %f\n", engine_map[class], percent);
>   
> -	if (flags & TEST_BUSY) {
> +	switch (expected_load) {
> +	case EXPECTED_LOAD_IDLE:
> +		igt_assert_eq(num, 0);
> +		break;
> +	case EXPECTED_LOAD_FULL:
> +		/*
> +		 * We are still relying on CPU sleep time and there could be
> +		 * some imprecision when calculating the load. Use a 5% margin.
> +		 */
>   		igt_assert_lt_double(95.0, percent);
>   		igt_assert_lt_double(percent, 105.0);
> -	} else {
> -		igt_assert_eq(num, 0);
> +		break;
>   	}
>   }
>   
> @@ -501,6 +513,7 @@ single(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe, unsigned int flags)
>   	struct pceu_cycles pceu1[2][DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE + 1];
>   	struct pceu_cycles pceu2[2][DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE + 1];
>   	struct spin_ctx *ctx = NULL;
> +	enum expected_load expected_load;
>   	uint32_t vm;
>   	int new_fd;
>   
> @@ -525,10 +538,16 @@ single(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe, unsigned int flags)
>   	if (flags & TEST_ISOLATION)
>   		read_engine_cycles(new_fd, pceu2[1]);
>   
> -	check_results(pceu1[0], pceu2[0], hwe->engine_class, flags);
> +	expected_load = flags & TEST_BUSY ?
> +	       EXPECTED_LOAD_FULL : EXPECTED_LOAD_IDLE;
> +	check_results(pceu1[0], pceu2[0], hwe->engine_class, expected_load);
>   
>   	if (flags & TEST_ISOLATION) {
> -		check_results(pceu1[1], pceu2[1], hwe->engine_class, 0);
> +		/*
> +		 * Load from one client shouldn't spill on another,
> +		 * so check for idle
> +		 */
> +		check_results(pceu1[1], pceu2[1], hwe->engine_class, EXPECTED_LOAD_IDLE);
>   		close(new_fd);
>   	}
>   
> @@ -557,9 +576,10 @@ busy_check_all(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
>   	read_engine_cycles(fd, pceu2);
>   
>   	xe_for_each_engine_class(class) {
> -		bool idle = hwe->engine_class != class;
> +		enum expected_load expected_load = hwe->engine_class != class ?
> +			EXPECTED_LOAD_IDLE : EXPECTED_LOAD_FULL;
>   
> -		check_results(pceu1, pceu2, class, idle ? 0 : TEST_BUSY);
> +		check_results(pceu1, pceu2, class, expected_load);
>   	}
>   
>   	spin_sync_end(fd, ctx);
> @@ -590,7 +610,7 @@ single_destroy_queue(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
>   
>   	xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
>   
> -	check_results(pceu1, pceu2, hwe->engine_class, TEST_BUSY);
> +	check_results(pceu1, pceu2, hwe->engine_class, EXPECTED_LOAD_FULL);
>   }
>   
>   static void
> @@ -623,12 +643,13 @@ most_busy_check_all(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
>   	read_engine_cycles(fd, pceu2);
>   
>   	xe_for_each_engine_class(class) {
> -		bool idle = hwe->engine_class == class;
> +		enum expected_load expected_load = hwe->engine_class == class ?
> +			EXPECTED_LOAD_IDLE : EXPECTED_LOAD_FULL;
>   
>   		if (!ctx[class])
>   			continue;
>   
> -		check_results(pceu1, pceu2, class, idle ? 0 : TEST_BUSY);
> +		check_results(pceu1, pceu2, class, expected_load);
>   		spin_sync_end(fd, ctx[class]);
>   		spin_ctx_destroy(fd, ctx[class]);
>   	}
> @@ -668,7 +689,7 @@ all_busy_check_all(int fd)
>   		if (!ctx[class])
>   			continue;
>   
> -		check_results(pceu1, pceu2, class, TEST_BUSY);
> +		check_results(pceu1, pceu2, class, EXPECTED_LOAD_FULL);
>   		spin_sync_end(fd, ctx[class]);
>   		spin_ctx_destroy(fd, ctx[class]);
>   	}

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-28 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-27 16:54 [PATCH i-g-t v3 00/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Fix noise and improve Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 01/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Extend mercy to the upper end Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 14:44   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-28 14:46     ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 02/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Print timestamp for debug Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 14:45   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 03/10] lib/igt_core: Add igt_assert_lt_double() Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 14:46   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 04/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Use igt_assert_lt_double() Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 14:48   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 05/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Be strict on == 0 comparison Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 14:51   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 06/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Use usec for batch duration Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 14:51   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 07/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Half the execution time Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 14:52   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 08/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Remove unused flags Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 15:00   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 09/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Use enum with expected load Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 14:56   ` Nirmoy Das [this message]
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 10/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Rename and reorder tests Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 15:08   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-28 15:14     ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-27 18:27 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success for tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Fix noise and improve (rev2) Patchwork
2024-08-27 18:38 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-08-28  4:05 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0c57cfcc-844a-4508-a302-bf6fc99b7670@linux.intel.com \
    --to=nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox