From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v3 10/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Rename and reorder tests
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 17:14:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9bc94fc1-0d0c-4f1f-9f4e-e0b1db8a0a7e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b603a4b7-f08b-44e6-876e-9273efc09f97@linux.intel.com>
On 8/28/2024 5:08 PM, Nirmoy Das wrote:
>
> On 8/27/2024 6:54 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> There are 2 main categories of tests in xe_drm_fdinfo:
>> mem and utilization. Group and name tests accordingly.
>>
>> For utilization, create subgroups: "single", "others" and "all",
>> with variants on each of them.
>>
>> No change in behavior on each tests, it's just rename and reorder.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>> ---
>> tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo.c | 148 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo.c b/tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo.c
>> index d45e45c6b..d1ed0fcaa 100644
>> --- a/tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo.c
>> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo.c
>> @@ -22,41 +22,41 @@
>> * Feature: SMI, core
>> * Test category: SysMan
>> *
>> - * SUBTEST: basic-memory
>> + * SUBTEST: basic-mem
>> * Description: Check if basic fdinfo content is present for memory
>> *
>> - * SUBTEST: basic-engine-utilization
>> + * SUBTEST: basic-utilization
>> * Description: Check if basic fdinfo content is present for engine
>> utilization
>> *
>> - * SUBTEST: drm-idle
>> - * Description: Check that engines show no load when idle
>> + * SUBTEST: mem-total-resident
>> + * Description: Create and compare total and resident memory
>> consumption by client
>> *
>> - * SUBTEST: drm-busy-idle
>> - * Description: Check that engines show load when idle after busy
>> + * SUBTEST: mem-shared
>> + * Description: Create and compare shared memory consumption by client
>> *
>> - * SUBTEST: drm-busy-idle-isolation
>> - * Description: Check that engine load does not spill over to other
>> drm clients
>> + * SUBTEST: mem-active
>> + * Description: Create and compare active memory consumption by client
>> *
>> - * SUBTEST: drm-busy-idle-check-all
>> - * Description: Check that only the target engine shows load when
>> idle after busy
>> + * SUBTEST: utilization-single-idle
>> + * Description: Check that each engine shows no load
>> *
>> - * SUBTEST: drm-most-busy-idle-check-all
>> - * Description: Check that only the target engine shows idle and all
>> others are busy
>> + * SUBTEST: utilization-single-full-load
>> + * Description: Check that each engine shows full load
>> *
>> - * SUBTEST: drm-all-busy-idle-check-all
>> - * Description: Check that all engines show busy when all are loaded
>> + * SUBTEST: utilization-single-full-load-isolation
>> + * Description: Check that each engine load does not spill over to
>> other drm clients
>> *
>> - * SUBTEST: drm-busy-exec-queue-destroy-idle
>> + * SUBTEST: utilization-single-full-load-destroy-queue
>> * Description: Destroy exec queue before idle and ensure load is
>> accurate
>> *
>> - * SUBTEST: drm-total-resident
>> - * Description: Create and compare total and resident memory
>> consumption by client
>> + * SUBTEST: utilization-others-idle
>> + * Description: Check that only the target engine shows load
>> *
>> - * SUBTEST: drm-shared
>> - * Description: Create and compare shared memory consumption by client
>> + * SUBTEST: utilization-others-full-load
>> + * Description: Check that only the target engine shows idle and all
>> others are busy
>> *
>> - * SUBTEST: drm-active
>> - * Description: Create and compare active memory consumption by client
>> + * SUBTEST: utilization-all-full-load
>> + * Description: Check that all engines show busy when all are loaded
>> */
>> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Read and verify drm client memory
>> consumption and engine utilization using fdinfo");
>> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static void read_engine_cycles(int xe, struct
>> pceu_cycles *pceu)
>> }
>> /* Subtests */
>> -static void test_active(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine *engine)
>> +static void mem_active(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine *engine)
>> {
>> struct drm_xe_mem_region *memregion;
>> uint64_t memreg = all_memory_regions(fd), region;
>> @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static void test_active(int fd, struct
>> drm_xe_engine *engine)
>> xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
>> }
>> -static void test_shared(int xe)
>> +static void mem_shared(int xe)
>> {
>> struct drm_xe_mem_region *memregion;
>> uint64_t memreg = all_memory_regions(xe), region;
>> @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static void test_shared(int xe)
>> }
>> }
>> -static void test_total_resident(int xe)
>> +static void mem_total_resident(int xe)
>> {
>> struct drm_xe_mem_region *memregion;
>> uint64_t memreg = all_memory_regions(xe), region;
>> @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ check_results(struct pceu_cycles *s1, struct
>> pceu_cycles *s2,
>> }
>> static void
>> -single(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe, unsigned
>> int flags)
>> +utilization_single(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe,
>> unsigned int flags)
>> {
>> struct pceu_cycles pceu1[2][DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE + 1];
>> struct pceu_cycles pceu2[2][DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE + 1];
>> @@ -557,64 +557,64 @@ single(int fd, struct
>> drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe, unsigned int flags)
>> }
>> static void
>> -busy_check_all(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
>> +utilization_single_destroy_queue(int fd, struct
>> drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
>> {
>> struct pceu_cycles pceu1[DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE + 1];
>> struct pceu_cycles pceu2[DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE + 1];
>> struct spin_ctx *ctx = NULL;
>> uint32_t vm;
>> - int class;
>> vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
>> -
>> ctx = spin_ctx_init(fd, hwe, vm);
>> spin_sync_start(fd, ctx);
>> read_engine_cycles(fd, pceu1);
>> usleep(batch_duration_usec);
>> - spin_sync_end(fd, ctx);
>> - read_engine_cycles(fd, pceu2);
>> -
>> - xe_for_each_engine_class(class) {
>> - enum expected_load expected_load = hwe->engine_class != class ?
>> - EXPECTED_LOAD_IDLE : EXPECTED_LOAD_FULL;
>> -
>> - check_results(pceu1, pceu2, class, expected_load);
>> - }
>> + /* destroy queue before sampling again */
>
>
> Wouldn't this change the behavior ?
ah never mind. This was moved from single_destroy_queue()
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Nirmoy
>
>> spin_sync_end(fd, ctx);
>> spin_ctx_destroy(fd, ctx);
>> +
>> + read_engine_cycles(fd, pceu2);
>> +
>> xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
>> +
>> + check_results(pceu1, pceu2, hwe->engine_class, EXPECTED_LOAD_FULL);
>> }
>> static void
>> -single_destroy_queue(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
>> +utilization_others_idle(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance
>> *hwe)
>> {
>> struct pceu_cycles pceu1[DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE + 1];
>> struct pceu_cycles pceu2[DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE + 1];
>> struct spin_ctx *ctx = NULL;
>> uint32_t vm;
>> + int class;
>> vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
>> +
>> ctx = spin_ctx_init(fd, hwe, vm);
>> spin_sync_start(fd, ctx);
>> read_engine_cycles(fd, pceu1);
>> usleep(batch_duration_usec);
>> -
>> - /* destroy queue before sampling again */
>> spin_sync_end(fd, ctx);
>> - spin_ctx_destroy(fd, ctx);
>> -
>> read_engine_cycles(fd, pceu2);
>> - xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
>> + xe_for_each_engine_class(class) {
>> + enum expected_load expected_load = hwe->engine_class != class ?
>> + EXPECTED_LOAD_IDLE : EXPECTED_LOAD_FULL;
>> - check_results(pceu1, pceu2, hwe->engine_class,
>> EXPECTED_LOAD_FULL);
>> + check_results(pceu1, pceu2, class, expected_load);
>> + }
>> +
>> + spin_sync_end(fd, ctx);
>> + spin_ctx_destroy(fd, ctx);
>> + xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
>> }
>> static void
>> -most_busy_check_all(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
>> +utilization_others_full_load(int fd, struct
>> drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
>> {
>> struct pceu_cycles pceu1[DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE + 1];
>> struct pceu_cycles pceu2[DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE + 1];
>> @@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ most_busy_check_all(int fd, struct
>> drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
>> }
>> static void
>> -all_busy_check_all(int fd)
>> +utilization_all_full_load(int fd)
>> {
>> struct pceu_cycles pceu1[DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE + 1];
>> struct pceu_cycles pceu2[DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE + 1];
>> @@ -710,51 +710,51 @@ igt_main
>> }
>> igt_describe("Check if basic fdinfo content is present for
>> memory");
>> - igt_subtest("basic-memory")
>> + igt_subtest("basic-mem")
>> basic_memory(xe);
>> igt_describe("Check if basic fdinfo content is present for
>> engine utilization");
>> - igt_subtest("basic-engine-utilization")
>> + igt_subtest("basic-utilization")
>> basic_engine_utilization(xe);
>> - igt_subtest("drm-idle")
>> - xe_for_each_engine(xe, hwe)
>> - single(xe, hwe, 0);
>> + igt_describe("Create and compare total and resident memory
>> consumption by client");
>> + igt_subtest("mem-total-resident")
>> + mem_total_resident(xe);
>> - igt_subtest("drm-busy-idle")
>> - xe_for_each_engine(xe, hwe)
>> - single(xe, hwe, TEST_BUSY | TEST_TRAILING_IDLE);
>> + igt_describe("Create and compare shared memory consumption by
>> client");
>> + igt_subtest("mem-shared")
>> + mem_shared(xe);
>> - igt_subtest("drm-busy-idle-isolation")
>> - xe_for_each_engine(xe, hwe)
>> - single(xe, hwe, TEST_BUSY | TEST_TRAILING_IDLE |
>> TEST_ISOLATION);
>> + igt_describe("Create and compare active memory consumption by
>> client");
>> + igt_subtest("mem-active")
>> + mem_active(xe, xe_engine(xe, 0));
>> - igt_subtest("drm-busy-idle-check-all")
>> + igt_subtest("utilization-single-idle")
>> xe_for_each_engine(xe, hwe)
>> - busy_check_all(xe, hwe);
>> + utilization_single(xe, hwe, 0);
>> - igt_subtest("drm-most-busy-idle-check-all")
>> + igt_subtest("utilization-single-full-load")
>> xe_for_each_engine(xe, hwe)
>> - most_busy_check_all(xe, hwe);
>> + utilization_single(xe, hwe, TEST_BUSY |
>> TEST_TRAILING_IDLE);
>> - igt_subtest("drm-all-busy-idle-check-all")
>> - all_busy_check_all(xe);
>> + igt_subtest("utilization-single-full-load-isolation")
>> + xe_for_each_engine(xe, hwe)
>> + utilization_single(xe, hwe, TEST_BUSY |
>> TEST_TRAILING_IDLE | TEST_ISOLATION);
>> - igt_subtest("drm-busy-exec-queue-destroy-idle")
>> + igt_subtest("utilization-single-full-load-destroy-queue")
>> xe_for_each_engine(xe, hwe)
>> - single_destroy_queue(xe, hwe);
>> + utilization_single_destroy_queue(xe, hwe);
>> - igt_describe("Create and compare total and resident memory
>> consumption by client");
>> - igt_subtest("drm-total-resident")
>> - test_total_resident(xe);
>> + igt_subtest("utilization-others-idle")
>> + xe_for_each_engine(xe, hwe)
>> + utilization_others_idle(xe, hwe);
>> - igt_describe("Create and compare shared memory consumption by
>> client");
>> - igt_subtest("drm-shared")
>> - test_shared(xe);
>> + igt_subtest("utilization-others-full-load")
>> + xe_for_each_engine(xe, hwe)
>> + utilization_others_full_load(xe, hwe);
>> - igt_describe("Create and compare active memory consumption by
>> client");
>> - igt_subtest("drm-active")
>> - test_active(xe, xe_engine(xe, 0));
>> + igt_subtest("utilization-all-full-load")
>> + utilization_all_full_load(xe);
>> igt_fixture {
>> drm_close_driver(xe);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-28 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-27 16:54 [PATCH i-g-t v3 00/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Fix noise and improve Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 01/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Extend mercy to the upper end Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 14:44 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-28 14:46 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 02/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Print timestamp for debug Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 14:45 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 03/10] lib/igt_core: Add igt_assert_lt_double() Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 14:46 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 04/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Use igt_assert_lt_double() Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 14:48 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 05/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Be strict on == 0 comparison Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 14:51 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 06/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Use usec for batch duration Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 14:51 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 07/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Half the execution time Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 14:52 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 08/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Remove unused flags Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 15:00 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 09/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Use enum with expected load Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 14:56 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-27 16:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 10/10] tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Rename and reorder tests Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-28 15:08 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-28 15:14 ` Nirmoy Das [this message]
2024-08-27 18:27 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success for tests/intel/xe_drm_fdinfo: Fix noise and improve (rev2) Patchwork
2024-08-27 18:38 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-08-28 4:05 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9bc94fc1-0d0c-4f1f-9f4e-e0b1db8a0a7e@linux.intel.com \
--to=nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox