public inbox for igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Vanshidhar Konda <vanshidhar.r.konda@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH v2 3/8] tests/kms_available_modes_crc: Don't set tiling for framebuffer
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 22:42:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200211204202.GB929@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875zgcx4le.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:15:57PM -0800, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 18:31:03 -0800, Imre Deak wrote:
> >
> > From: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshidhar.r.konda@intel.com>
> >
> > The GEM object used for the framebuffer does not need tiling to be set
> > on it as the entire framebuffer is being filled with the same value -
> > tiling will not impact the end value of the buffer.
> >
> > Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshidhar.r.konda@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  tests/kms_available_modes_crc.c | 6 ------
> >  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/kms_available_modes_crc.c b/tests/kms_available_modes_crc.c
> > index 12761343..ed43d1fb 100644
> > --- a/tests/kms_available_modes_crc.c
> > +++ b/tests/kms_available_modes_crc.c
> > @@ -211,17 +211,11 @@ static bool setup_fb(data_t *data, igt_output_t *output, igt_plane_t *plane,
> >	data->buf = (unsigned char *)calloc(data->size*2, 1);
> >
> >	data->gem_handle = gem_create(data->gfx_fd, gemsize);
> > -	ret = __gem_set_tiling(data->gfx_fd, data->gem_handle,
> > -			       igt_fb_mod_to_tiling(tiling),
> > -			       data->fb.strides[0]);
> > -
> >	data->fb.gem_handle = data->gem_handle;
> >	data->fb.width = w;
> >	data->fb.height = h;
> >	fill_in_fb(data, output, plane, format);
> >
> > -	igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
> > -
> >	ret = __kms_addfb(data->gfx_fd, data->gem_handle, w, h,
> >			  format, tiling, data->fb.strides, data->fb.offsets,
> >			  num_planes, LOCAL_DRM_MODE_FB_MODIFIERS,
> 
> I think there are still the following remaining issues with this patch:
> 
> 1. 33cc93c8 has introduced a gem_require_mappable_ggtt() skipping the
>    entire test. That should probably be removed as part of this patch?
> 
> 2. do_write() has a gem_mmap__gtt() which should be converted to
>    device_coherent()?

That's a good point, we'll need to use another way to write the test
image to the FB and stop skipping the test. However I think this patch
is still valid on its own, and the above things can be done as a
follow-up.

> 3. This is sort of optional but in my view there is an inconsistency here
>    which should be addressed:
> 
>    The original test was actually using a tiled object and using the tiling
>    available in the aperture/gtt to write to the object. Through this patch
>    we have essentially removed the tiling on the object. However, we are
>    continuing to use LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED in setup_fb(). It just
>    happens that because we are filling in a single value the modifier is
>    immaterial.

It's not immaterial, the display will scan out an X tiled FB.

> 
>    Shouldn't this be made consistent? Either
> 
>    (a) we should change the modifier to LOCAL_DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE, or
> 
>    (b) if we are going to use the tiled modifer we should assume the object
>        is really tiled and use the blitter or rendercopy to write to the
>        object.

The test just solid fills the FB and we don't need to do that in a pixel
line-by-line order.

>    I guess (a) is simpler to do.
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-11 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-11  2:31 [igt-dev] [PATCH v2 1/8] lib/igt_draw: Refactor get_tiling calls Imre Deak
2020-02-11  2:31 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v2 2/8] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Skip set tiling calls if not supported Imre Deak
2020-02-11  2:31 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v2 3/8] tests/kms_available_modes_crc: Don't set tiling for framebuffer Imre Deak
2020-02-11 20:15   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2020-02-11 20:42     ` Imre Deak [this message]
2020-02-11 22:35       ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2020-02-11  2:31 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v2 4/8] tests/kms_draw_crc: Skip GTT subtests on platforms w/o aperture Imre Deak
2020-02-12  0:17   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2020-02-12  2:41     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2020-02-12  2:49       ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2020-02-11  2:31 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v2 5/8] tests/kms_draw_crc: Fix generating reference CRCs " Imre Deak
2020-02-11 15:34   ` Matt Roper
2020-02-12  0:29   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2020-02-12 10:23     ` Imre Deak
2020-02-12 16:57       ` Imre Deak
2020-02-12 21:50   ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v3 " Imre Deak
2020-02-13  4:20     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2020-02-13  8:09       ` Imre Deak
2020-02-11  2:31 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v2 6/8] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Skip GTT subtests " Imre Deak
2020-02-11 15:45   ` Matt Roper
2020-02-11 15:53     ` Imre Deak
2020-02-12  5:45   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2020-02-12 17:01     ` Imre Deak
2020-02-12 21:50   ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v3 " Imre Deak
2020-02-13  4:34     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2020-02-11  2:31 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v2 7/8] lib/igt_draw: Fix igt_draw_fill_fb() " Imre Deak
2020-02-12  3:48   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2020-02-12 21:50   ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v3 " Imre Deak
2020-02-13  4:22     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2020-02-11  2:31 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v2 8/8] lib/igt_fb: Make sure tiled YUV framebuffers are fully cleared Imre Deak
2020-02-11  3:21 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/8] lib/igt_draw: Refactor get_tiling calls Patchwork
2020-02-11 15:33 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v2 1/8] " Matt Roper
2020-02-12 16:46 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [v2,1/8] " Patchwork
2020-02-13  8:26   ` Imre Deak
2020-02-12 22:36 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/8] lib/igt_draw: Refactor get_tiling calls (rev4) Patchwork
2020-02-15 17:55 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200211204202.GB929@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=vanshidhar.r.konda@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox