From: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 02/20] xe_ioctl: Converge bo_create to the most used version
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:54:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231129145457.7-3-francois.dugast@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231129145457.7-1-francois.dugast@intel.com>
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Let's unify the call instead of having 2 separated
options for the same goal.
v2: Fix some xe_bo_create_flags arguments, remove extra new
line (Kamil Konieczny)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
---
lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c | 15 ---------------
lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h | 1 -
tests/intel/xe_perf_pmu.c | 4 ++--
tests/intel/xe_spin_batch.c | 2 +-
tests/intel/xe_vm.c | 8 ++++----
5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c b/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c
index 738c4ffdb..78d431ab2 100644
--- a/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c
+++ b/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c
@@ -253,21 +253,6 @@ uint32_t xe_bo_create_flags(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t size, uint32_t flags)
return handle;
}
-uint32_t xe_bo_create(int fd, int gt, uint32_t vm, uint64_t size)
-{
- struct drm_xe_gem_create create = {
- .vm_id = vm,
- .size = size,
- .flags = vram_if_possible(fd, gt),
- };
- int err;
-
- err = igt_ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_GEM_CREATE, &create);
- igt_assert_eq(err, 0);
-
- return create.handle;
-}
-
uint32_t xe_bind_exec_queue_create(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t ext, bool async)
{
struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance instance = {
diff --git a/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h b/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h
index a9171bcf7..fb191d98f 100644
--- a/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h
+++ b/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h
@@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ void xe_vm_destroy(int fd, uint32_t vm);
uint32_t __xe_bo_create_flags(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t size, uint32_t flags,
uint32_t *handle);
uint32_t xe_bo_create_flags(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t size, uint32_t flags);
-uint32_t xe_bo_create(int fd, int gt, uint32_t vm, uint64_t size);
uint32_t xe_exec_queue_create(int fd, uint32_t vm,
struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *instance,
uint64_t ext);
diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_perf_pmu.c b/tests/intel/xe_perf_pmu.c
index e9d05cf2b..196e4d2e6 100644
--- a/tests/intel/xe_perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_perf_pmu.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void test_any_engine_busyness(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance
bo_size = ALIGN(bo_size + xe_cs_prefetch_size(fd),
xe_get_default_alignment(fd));
- bo = xe_bo_create(fd, eci->gt_id, vm, bo_size);
+ bo = xe_bo_create_flags(fd, vm, bo_size, vram_if_possible(fd, eci->gt_id));
spin = xe_bo_map(fd, bo, bo_size);
exec_queue = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, eci, 0);
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static void test_engine_group_busyness(int fd, int gt, int class, const char *na
bo_size = sizeof(*data) * num_placements;
bo_size = ALIGN(bo_size + xe_cs_prefetch_size(fd), xe_get_default_alignment(fd));
- bo = xe_bo_create(fd, gt, vm, bo_size);
+ bo = xe_bo_create_flags(fd, vm, bo_size, vram_if_possible(fd, gt));
data = xe_bo_map(fd, bo, bo_size);
for (i = 0; i < num_placements; i++) {
diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_spin_batch.c b/tests/intel/xe_spin_batch.c
index 6ab604d9b..261fde9af 100644
--- a/tests/intel/xe_spin_batch.c
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_spin_batch.c
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static void xe_spin_fixed_duration(int fd)
exec_queue = xe_exec_queue_create_class(fd, vm, DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY);
ahnd = intel_allocator_open(fd, 0, INTEL_ALLOCATOR_RELOC);
bo_size = ALIGN(sizeof(*spin) + xe_cs_prefetch_size(fd), xe_get_default_alignment(fd));
- bo = xe_bo_create(fd, 0, vm, bo_size);
+ bo = xe_bo_create_flags(fd, vm, bo_size, vram_if_possible(fd, 0));
spin = xe_bo_map(fd, bo, bo_size);
spin_addr = intel_allocator_alloc_with_strategy(ahnd, bo, bo_size, 0,
ALLOC_STRATEGY_LOW_TO_HIGH);
diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_vm.c b/tests/intel/xe_vm.c
index 86664740f..b4577fb6e 100644
--- a/tests/intel/xe_vm.c
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_vm.c
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static void test_partial_unbinds(int fd)
{
uint32_t vm = xe_vm_create(fd, DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_ASYNC_DEFAULT, 0);
size_t bo_size = 3 * xe_get_default_alignment(fd);
- uint32_t bo = xe_bo_create(fd, 0, vm, bo_size);
+ uint32_t bo = xe_bo_create_flags(fd, vm, bo_size, vram_if_possible(fd, 0));
uint64_t unbind_size = bo_size / 3;
uint64_t addr = 0x1a0000;
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static void unbind_all(int fd, int n_vmas)
};
vm = xe_vm_create(fd, DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_ASYNC_DEFAULT, 0);
- bo = xe_bo_create(fd, 0, vm, bo_size);
+ bo = xe_bo_create_flags(fd, vm, bo_size, vram_if_possible(fd, 0));
for (i = 0; i < n_vmas; ++i)
xe_vm_bind_async(fd, vm, 0, bo, 0, addr + i * bo_size,
@@ -1577,9 +1577,9 @@ test_mmap_style_bind(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
igt_assert(map0 != MAP_FAILED);
igt_assert(map1 != MAP_FAILED);
} else {
- bo0 = xe_bo_create(fd, eci->gt_id, vm, bo_size);
+ bo0 = xe_bo_create_flags(fd, vm, bo_size, vram_if_possible(fd, eci->gt_id));
map0 = xe_bo_map(fd, bo0, bo_size);
- bo1 = xe_bo_create(fd, eci->gt_id, vm, bo_size);
+ bo1 = xe_bo_create_flags(fd, vm, bo_size, vram_if_possible(fd, eci->gt_id));
map1 = xe_bo_map(fd, bo1, bo_size);
}
memset(map0, 0, bo_size);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-29 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-29 14:54 [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 00/20] uAPI Alignment - Cleanup and future proof Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 14:54 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 01/20] drm-uapi/xe: Extend drm_xe_vm_bind_op Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 14:54 ` Francois Dugast [this message]
2023-11-29 14:54 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 03/20] xe_ioctl: Rename *xe_bo_create_flags to simply xe_bo_create Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 14:54 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 04/20] xe_query: Add missing include Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 14:54 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 05/20] xe_query: Kill visible_vram_if_possible Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 14:54 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 06/20] drm-uapi/xe: Separate bo_create placement from flags Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 14:54 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 07/20] xe: s/hw_engine/engine Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 14:54 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 08/20] drm-uapi/xe: Make DRM_XE_DEVICE_QUERY_ENGINES future proof Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 14:54 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 09/20] drm-uapi/xe: Reject bo creation of unaligned size Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 14:54 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 10/20] drm-uapi/xe: Align on a common way to return arrays (memory regions) Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 14:54 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 11/20] drm-uapi/xe: Align on a common way to return arrays (gt) Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 14:54 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 12/20] drm-uapi/xe: Align on a common way to return arrays (engines) Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 14:54 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 13/20] drm-uapi/xe: Split xe_sync types from flags Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 14:54 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 14/20] drm-uapi/xe: Kill tile_mask Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 9:05 ` Matthew Brost
2023-11-29 14:54 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 15/20] drm-uapi/xe: Crystal Reference Clock updates Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 14:54 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 16/20] drm-uapi/xe: Remove bogus engine list from the wait_user_fence IOCTL Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 14:54 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 17/20] drm-uapi/xe: Add Tile ID information to the GT info query Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 14:54 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 18/20] drm-uapi/xe: Fix various struct padding for 64b alignment Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 14:54 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 19/20] drm-uapi/xe: Move xe_exec after xe_exec_queue Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 14:54 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v4 20/20] tests/intel/xe: Adjust to KMD uAPI changes for long-running VMs Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 15:16 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for uAPI Alignment - Cleanup and future proof (rev4) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231129145457.7-3-francois.dugast@intel.com \
--to=francois.dugast@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox