From: "Joshi, Kunal1" <kunal1.joshi@intel.com>
To: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>,
"igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Murthy, Arun R" <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>,
"Manna, Animesh" <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] lib/igt_psr: add support for PR selective update
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 13:42:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53d147f8-eba2-4030-a506-bb7fffd65eaf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18efe76c653963719a02755b432e754c9daad723.camel@intel.com>
Hello Jouni,
On 2/19/2024 1:30 PM, Hogander, Jouni wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-02-18 at 14:47 +0530, Kunal Joshi wrote:
>> Extend the tests to cover panel replay selective fetch feature.
>>
>> From kms_psr2_sf test point of view we have
>> check_pr_psr2_sel_fetch_support
>> function to check if PR/PSR2 selective fetch is supported for an
>> output
>> if output supports selective fetch then we check we enter DEEP_SLEEP
>> mode
>> in run function
>>
>> v2: fixed dynamic test name
>> v3: use check_psr2_support (Jouni)
>> v4: split patches (Jouni)
>>
>> Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
>> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
>> Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kunal Joshi <kunal1.joshi@intel.com>
>> ---
>> lib/igt_psr.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> lib/igt_psr.h | 6 +++---
>> tests/kms_cursor_legacy.c | 4 ++--
>> 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/igt_psr.c b/lib/igt_psr.c
>> index cad8cce05..9accd2047 100644
>> --- a/lib/igt_psr.c
>> +++ b/lib/igt_psr.c
>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ bool psr_disabled_check(int debugfs_fd)
>> return strstr(buf, "PSR mode: disabled\n");
>> }
>>
>> -bool psr2_selective_fetch_check(int debugfs_fd, igt_output_t
>> *output)
>> +bool selective_fetch_check(int debugfs_fd, igt_output_t *output)
>> {
>> char buf[PSR_STATUS_MAX_LEN];
>> char debugfs_file[128] = {0};
>> @@ -248,7 +248,9 @@ bool psr_sink_support(int device, int debugfs_fd,
>> enum psr_mode mode, igt_output
>> (strstr(line, "PSR = yes") &&
>> (strstr(line, "[0x03]") || strstr(line,
>> "[0x04]")));
>> case PR_MODE:
>> - return strstr(line, "Panel Replay = yes");
>> + return strstr(line, "Panel Replay = yes, Panel Replay
>> Selective Update = no");
>> + case PR_MODE_SEL_FETCH:
>> + return strstr(line, "Panel Replay = yes, Panel Replay
>> Selective Update = yes");
>> default:
>> igt_assert_f(false, "Invalid psr mode\n");
>> return false;
>> @@ -317,7 +319,7 @@ bool i915_psr2_selective_fetch_check(int drm_fd,
>> igt_output_t *output)
>> return false;
>>
>> debugfs_fd = igt_debugfs_dir(drm_fd);
>> - ret = psr2_selective_fetch_check(debugfs_fd, output);
>> + ret = selective_fetch_check(debugfs_fd, output);
>> close(debugfs_fd);
>>
>> return ret;
>> @@ -334,17 +336,24 @@ bool i915_psr2_selective_fetch_check(int
>> drm_fd, igt_output_t *output)
>> * Returns:
>> * True if PSR mode changed to PSR1, false otherwise.
>> */
>> -bool i915_psr2_sel_fetch_to_psr1(int drm_fd, igt_output_t *output)
>> +bool i915_pr_psr2_sel_fetch_to_pr_psr1(int drm_fd, igt_output_t
>> *output)
>> {
>> int debugfs_fd;
>> bool ret = false;
>> + enum psr_mode mode;
>>
>> if (!is_intel_device(drm_fd))
>> return ret;
>>
>> debugfs_fd = igt_debugfs_dir(drm_fd);
>> - if (psr2_selective_fetch_check(debugfs_fd, output)) {
>> - psr_set(drm_fd, debugfs_fd, PSR_MODE_1, output);
>> + if (selective_fetch_check(debugfs_fd, output)) {
>> + mode = psr_get_mode(debugfs_fd, output);
>> + if (mode == PR_MODE_SEL_FETCH)
>> + psr_set(drm_fd, debugfs_fd, PR_MODE, output);
>> + else if (mode == PSR_MODE_2_SEL_FETCH)
>> + psr_set(drm_fd, debugfs_fd, PSR_MODE_1,
>> output);
>> + else
>> + igt_assert("switch not possible from current
>> psr mode\n");
> There is no need to change this function. psr2_selective_fetch_check
> (now selective_fetch_check) works for PR and PSR.
>
> BR,
>
> Jouni Högander
Have modified selective_fetch_check to check for a particular output,
bool selective_fetch_check(int debugfs_fd, igt_output_t *output)
{
char buf[PSR_STATUS_MAX_LEN];
char debugfs_file[128] = {0};
SET_DEBUGFS_PATH(output, debugfs_file);
igt_debugfs_simple_read(debugfs_fd, debugfs_file, buf,
sizeof(buf));
return strstr(buf, "PSR2 selective fetch: enabled");
}
Will this be not required?
Thanks and Regards
Kunal Joshi
>
>> ret = true;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -358,12 +367,17 @@ bool i915_psr2_sel_fetch_to_psr1(int drm_fd,
>> igt_output_t *output)
>> * Restore PSR2 selective fetch after tests were executed, this
>> function should
>> * only be called if i915_psr2_sel_fetch_to_psr1() returned true.
>> */
>> -void i915_psr2_sel_fetch_restore(int drm_fd, igt_output_t *output)
>> +void i915_pr_psr2_sel_fetch_restore(int drm_fd, igt_output_t
>> *output)
>> {
>> int debugfs_fd;
>> + enum psr_mode mode;
>>
>> debugfs_fd = igt_debugfs_dir(drm_fd);
>> - psr_set(drm_fd, debugfs_fd, PSR_MODE_2_SEL_FETCH, output);
>> + mode = psr_get_mode(debugfs_fd, output);
>> + if (mode == PR_MODE)
>> + psr_set(drm_fd, debugfs_fd, PR_MODE_SEL_FETCH,
>> output);
>> + else
>> + psr_set(drm_fd, debugfs_fd, PSR_MODE_2_SEL_FETCH,
>> output);
>> close(debugfs_fd);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -389,11 +403,13 @@ enum psr_mode psr_get_mode(int debugfs_fd,
>> igt_output_t *output)
>>
>> if (strstr(buf, "Panel Replay Enabled"))
>> return PR_MODE;
>> + else if (strstr(buf, "Panel Replay Selective Update
>> Enabled"))
>> + return PR_MODE_SEL_FETCH;
>> else if (strstr(buf, "PSR2 selective fetch: enabled"))
>> return PSR_MODE_2_SEL_FETCH;
>> - else if (strstr(buf, "PSR2 enabled"))
>> + else if (strstr(buf, "PSR2"))
>> return PSR_MODE_2;
>> - else if (strstr(buf, "PSR1 enabled"))
>> + else if (strstr(buf, "PSR1"))
>> return PSR_MODE_1;
>>
>> return PSR_DISABLED;
>> diff --git a/lib/igt_psr.h b/lib/igt_psr.h
>> index 372bef2b2..36ba7f068 100644
>> --- a/lib/igt_psr.h
>> +++ b/lib/igt_psr.h
>> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ enum fbc_mode {
>> };
>>
>> bool psr_disabled_check(int debugfs_fd);
>> -bool psr2_selective_fetch_check(int debugfs_fd, igt_output_t
>> *output);
>> +bool selective_fetch_check(int debugfs_fd, igt_output_t *output);
>> bool psr_wait_entry(int debugfs_fd, enum psr_mode mode, igt_output_t
>> *output);
>> bool psr_wait_update(int debugfs_fd, enum psr_mode mode,
>> igt_output_t *output);
>> bool psr_long_wait_update(int debugfs_fd, enum psr_mode mode,
>> igt_output_t *output);
>> @@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ enum psr_mode psr_get_mode(int debugfs_fd,
>> igt_output_t *output);
>>
>> bool i915_psr2_selective_fetch_check(int drm_fd, igt_output_t
>> *output);
>>
>> -bool i915_psr2_sel_fetch_to_psr1(int drm_fd, igt_output_t *output);
>> -void i915_psr2_sel_fetch_restore(int drm_fd, igt_output_t *output);
>> +bool i915_pr_psr2_sel_fetch_to_pr_psr1(int drm_fd, igt_output_t
>> *output);
>> +void i915_pr_psr2_sel_fetch_restore(int drm_fd, igt_output_t
>> *output);
>> bool is_psr_enable_possible(int drm_fd, enum psr_mode mode);
>>
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/tests/kms_cursor_legacy.c b/tests/kms_cursor_legacy.c
>> index a430f735a..91e5e9b07 100644
>> --- a/tests/kms_cursor_legacy.c
>> +++ b/tests/kms_cursor_legacy.c
>> @@ -1849,7 +1849,7 @@ igt_main
>> * page flip with cursor legacy APIS when Intel's
>> PSR2 selective
>> * fetch is enabled, so switching PSR1 for this whole
>> test.
>> */
>> - intel_psr2_restore =
>> i915_psr2_sel_fetch_to_psr1(display.drm_fd, NULL);
>> + intel_psr2_restore =
>> i915_pr_psr2_sel_fetch_to_pr_psr1(display.drm_fd, NULL);
>> }
>>
>> igt_describe("Test checks how many cursor updates we can fit
>> between vblanks "
>> @@ -2074,7 +2074,7 @@ igt_main
>>
>> igt_fixture {
>> if (intel_psr2_restore)
>> - i915_psr2_sel_fetch_restore(display.drm_fd,
>> NULL);
>> + i915_pr_psr2_sel_fetch_restore(display.drm_fd
>> , NULL);
>> igt_display_fini(&display);
>> drm_close_driver(display.drm_fd);
>> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-19 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-18 9:17 [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] extend psr2_sf test for pr_sf Kunal Joshi
2024-02-18 9:17 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] lib/igt_psr: modify library to support multiple PSR/PR outputs Kunal Joshi
2024-02-19 7:45 ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-02-19 8:07 ` Joshi, Kunal1
2024-02-19 8:33 ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-02-19 8:36 ` Joshi, Kunal1
2024-02-18 9:17 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] lib/igt_psr: add support for PR selective update Kunal Joshi
2024-02-19 8:00 ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-02-19 8:12 ` Joshi, Kunal1 [this message]
2024-02-19 8:56 ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-02-19 9:01 ` Joshi, Kunal1
2024-02-19 10:01 ` Joshi, Kunal1
2024-02-19 10:29 ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-02-18 9:17 ` [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] tests/intel/kms_psr2_sf: extend tests for panel replay sf Kunal Joshi
2024-02-19 8:31 ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-02-18 9:36 ` ✗ GitLab.Pipeline: warning for extend psr2_sf test for pr_sf (rev5) Patchwork
2024-02-18 9:53 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success " Patchwork
2024-02-18 10:04 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-02-18 11:26 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-19 16:33 [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] extend psr2_sf test for pr_sf Kunal Joshi
2024-02-19 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] lib/igt_psr: add support for PR selective update Kunal Joshi
2024-02-20 8:48 ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-02-21 9:01 [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] extend psr2_sf test for pr_sf Kunal Joshi
2024-02-21 9:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] lib/igt_psr: add support for PR selective update Kunal Joshi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53d147f8-eba2-4030-a506-bb7fffd65eaf@intel.com \
--to=kunal1.joshi@intel.com \
--cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
--cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox