From: "Joshi, Kunal1" <kunal1.joshi@intel.com>
To: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>,
"Animesh Manna" <animesh.manna@intel.com>,
"Arun R Murthy" <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] lib/igt_psr: add support for PR selective update
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:31:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf9a4415-3887-4b9c-ad84-7426e37c1d47@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240218091704.2259937-3-kunal1.joshi@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6816 bytes --]
Hello Jouni,
On 2/18/2024 2:47 PM, Kunal Joshi wrote:
> Extend the tests to cover panel replay selective fetch feature.
>
> From kms_psr2_sf test point of view we have check_pr_psr2_sel_fetch_support
> function to check if PR/PSR2 selective fetch is supported for an output
> if output supports selective fetch then we check we enter DEEP_SLEEP mode
> in run function
>
> v2: fixed dynamic test name
> v3: use check_psr2_support (Jouni)
> v4: split patches (Jouni)
>
> Cc: Jouni Högander<jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> Cc: Animesh Manna<animesh.manna@intel.com>
> Cc: Arun R Murthy<arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kunal Joshi<kunal1.joshi@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/igt_psr.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> lib/igt_psr.h | 6 +++---
> tests/kms_cursor_legacy.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/igt_psr.c b/lib/igt_psr.c
> index cad8cce05..9accd2047 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_psr.c
> +++ b/lib/igt_psr.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ bool psr_disabled_check(int debugfs_fd)
> return strstr(buf, "PSR mode: disabled\n");
> }
>
> -bool psr2_selective_fetch_check(int debugfs_fd, igt_output_t *output)
> +bool selective_fetch_check(int debugfs_fd, igt_output_t *output)
> {
> char buf[PSR_STATUS_MAX_LEN];
> char debugfs_file[128] = {0};
> @@ -248,7 +248,9 @@ bool psr_sink_support(int device, int debugfs_fd, enum psr_mode mode, igt_output
> (strstr(line, "PSR = yes") &&
> (strstr(line, "[0x03]") || strstr(line, "[0x04]")));
> case PR_MODE:
> - return strstr(line, "Panel Replay = yes");
> + return strstr(line, "Panel Replay = yes, Panel Replay Selective Update = no");
> + case PR_MODE_SEL_FETCH:
> + return strstr(line, "Panel Replay = yes, Panel Replay Selective Update = yes");
> default:
> igt_assert_f(false, "Invalid psr mode\n");
> return false;
> @@ -317,7 +319,7 @@ bool i915_psr2_selective_fetch_check(int drm_fd, igt_output_t *output)
> return false;
>
> debugfs_fd = igt_debugfs_dir(drm_fd);
> - ret = psr2_selective_fetch_check(debugfs_fd, output);
> + ret = selective_fetch_check(debugfs_fd, output);
> close(debugfs_fd);
>
> return ret;
> @@ -334,17 +336,24 @@ bool i915_psr2_selective_fetch_check(int drm_fd, igt_output_t *output)
> * Returns:
> * True if PSR mode changed to PSR1, false otherwise.
> */
> -bool i915_psr2_sel_fetch_to_psr1(int drm_fd, igt_output_t *output)
> +bool i915_pr_psr2_sel_fetch_to_pr_psr1(int drm_fd, igt_output_t *output)
> {
> int debugfs_fd;
> bool ret = false;
> + enum psr_mode mode;
>
> if (!is_intel_device(drm_fd))
> return ret;
>
> debugfs_fd = igt_debugfs_dir(drm_fd);
> - if (psr2_selective_fetch_check(debugfs_fd, output)) {
> - psr_set(drm_fd, debugfs_fd, PSR_MODE_1, output);
> + if (selective_fetch_check(debugfs_fd, output)) {
> + mode = psr_get_mode(debugfs_fd, output);
> + if (mode == PR_MODE_SEL_FETCH)
> + psr_set(drm_fd, debugfs_fd, PR_MODE, output);
> + else if (mode == PSR_MODE_2_SEL_FETCH)
> + psr_set(drm_fd, debugfs_fd, PSR_MODE_1, output);
> + else
> + igt_assert("switch not possible from current psr mode\n");
> ret = true;
> }
>
> @@ -358,12 +367,17 @@ bool i915_psr2_sel_fetch_to_psr1(int drm_fd, igt_output_t *output)
> * Restore PSR2 selective fetch after tests were executed, this function should
> * only be called if i915_psr2_sel_fetch_to_psr1() returned true.
> */
> -void i915_psr2_sel_fetch_restore(int drm_fd, igt_output_t *output)
> +void i915_pr_psr2_sel_fetch_restore(int drm_fd, igt_output_t *output)
> {
> int debugfs_fd;
> + enum psr_mode mode;
>
> debugfs_fd = igt_debugfs_dir(drm_fd);
> - psr_set(drm_fd, debugfs_fd, PSR_MODE_2_SEL_FETCH, output);
> + mode = psr_get_mode(debugfs_fd, output);
> + if (mode == PR_MODE)
> + psr_set(drm_fd, debugfs_fd, PR_MODE_SEL_FETCH, output);
> + else
> + psr_set(drm_fd, debugfs_fd, PSR_MODE_2_SEL_FETCH, output);
> close(debugfs_fd);
> }
What do you think of this change, do we need to care about PR/PSR2
Selective fetch or just
write PSR_MODE_2_SEL_FETCH? Thanks and Regards Kunal Joshi
>
> @@ -389,11 +403,13 @@ enum psr_mode psr_get_mode(int debugfs_fd, igt_output_t *output)
>
> if (strstr(buf, "Panel Replay Enabled"))
> return PR_MODE;
> + else if (strstr(buf, "Panel Replay Selective Update Enabled"))
> + return PR_MODE_SEL_FETCH;
> else if (strstr(buf, "PSR2 selective fetch: enabled"))
> return PSR_MODE_2_SEL_FETCH;
> - else if (strstr(buf, "PSR2 enabled"))
> + else if (strstr(buf, "PSR2"))
> return PSR_MODE_2;
> - else if (strstr(buf, "PSR1 enabled"))
> + else if (strstr(buf, "PSR1"))
> return PSR_MODE_1;
>
> return PSR_DISABLED;
> diff --git a/lib/igt_psr.h b/lib/igt_psr.h
> index 372bef2b2..36ba7f068 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_psr.h
> +++ b/lib/igt_psr.h
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ enum fbc_mode {
> };
>
> bool psr_disabled_check(int debugfs_fd);
> -bool psr2_selective_fetch_check(int debugfs_fd, igt_output_t *output);
> +bool selective_fetch_check(int debugfs_fd, igt_output_t *output);
> bool psr_wait_entry(int debugfs_fd, enum psr_mode mode, igt_output_t *output);
> bool psr_wait_update(int debugfs_fd, enum psr_mode mode, igt_output_t *output);
> bool psr_long_wait_update(int debugfs_fd, enum psr_mode mode, igt_output_t *output);
> @@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ enum psr_mode psr_get_mode(int debugfs_fd, igt_output_t *output);
>
> bool i915_psr2_selective_fetch_check(int drm_fd, igt_output_t *output);
>
> -bool i915_psr2_sel_fetch_to_psr1(int drm_fd, igt_output_t *output);
> -void i915_psr2_sel_fetch_restore(int drm_fd, igt_output_t *output);
> +bool i915_pr_psr2_sel_fetch_to_pr_psr1(int drm_fd, igt_output_t *output);
> +void i915_pr_psr2_sel_fetch_restore(int drm_fd, igt_output_t *output);
> bool is_psr_enable_possible(int drm_fd, enum psr_mode mode);
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/tests/kms_cursor_legacy.c b/tests/kms_cursor_legacy.c
> index a430f735a..91e5e9b07 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_cursor_legacy.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_cursor_legacy.c
> @@ -1849,7 +1849,7 @@ igt_main
> * page flip with cursor legacy APIS when Intel's PSR2 selective
> * fetch is enabled, so switching PSR1 for this whole test.
> */
> - intel_psr2_restore = i915_psr2_sel_fetch_to_psr1(display.drm_fd, NULL);
> + intel_psr2_restore = i915_pr_psr2_sel_fetch_to_pr_psr1(display.drm_fd, NULL);
> }
>
> igt_describe("Test checks how many cursor updates we can fit between vblanks "
> @@ -2074,7 +2074,7 @@ igt_main
>
> igt_fixture {
> if (intel_psr2_restore)
> - i915_psr2_sel_fetch_restore(display.drm_fd, NULL);
> + i915_pr_psr2_sel_fetch_restore(display.drm_fd, NULL);
> igt_display_fini(&display);
> drm_close_driver(display.drm_fd);
> }
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7506 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-19 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-18 9:17 [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] extend psr2_sf test for pr_sf Kunal Joshi
2024-02-18 9:17 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] lib/igt_psr: modify library to support multiple PSR/PR outputs Kunal Joshi
2024-02-19 7:45 ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-02-19 8:07 ` Joshi, Kunal1
2024-02-19 8:33 ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-02-19 8:36 ` Joshi, Kunal1
2024-02-18 9:17 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] lib/igt_psr: add support for PR selective update Kunal Joshi
2024-02-19 8:00 ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-02-19 8:12 ` Joshi, Kunal1
2024-02-19 8:56 ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-02-19 9:01 ` Joshi, Kunal1
2024-02-19 10:01 ` Joshi, Kunal1 [this message]
2024-02-19 10:29 ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-02-18 9:17 ` [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] tests/intel/kms_psr2_sf: extend tests for panel replay sf Kunal Joshi
2024-02-19 8:31 ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-02-18 9:36 ` ✗ GitLab.Pipeline: warning for extend psr2_sf test for pr_sf (rev5) Patchwork
2024-02-18 9:53 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success " Patchwork
2024-02-18 10:04 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-02-18 11:26 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-19 16:33 [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] extend psr2_sf test for pr_sf Kunal Joshi
2024-02-19 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] lib/igt_psr: add support for PR selective update Kunal Joshi
2024-02-20 8:48 ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-02-21 9:01 [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] extend psr2_sf test for pr_sf Kunal Joshi
2024-02-21 9:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] lib/igt_psr: add support for PR selective update Kunal Joshi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bf9a4415-3887-4b9c-ad84-7426e37c1d47@intel.com \
--to=kunal1.joshi@intel.com \
--cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
--cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox