From: "Bernatowicz, Marcin" <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 6/8] benchmarks/gem_wsim: allow comments in workload description files
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 17:05:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60135ff9-3153-ad28-0185-946a68db4eed@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98157e3c-c908-72dd-1be3-664cdc3403aa@linux.intel.com>
Hi,
On 9/20/2023 6:13 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 06/09/2023 16:51, Marcin Bernatowicz wrote:
>> Lines starting with '#' are skipped.
>> If command line step separator (',') is encountered after '#'
>> it is replaced with ';' to not break parsing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> benchmarks/gem_wsim.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> benchmarks/wsim/README | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
>> index 0c1b58727..ec9fdc2d0 100644
>> --- a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
>> +++ b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
>> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>> #include <limits.h>
>> #include <pthread.h>
>> #include <math.h>
>> +#include <ctype.h>
>> #include "drm.h"
>> #include "drmtest.h"
>> @@ -94,6 +95,7 @@ enum w_type {
>> TERMINATE,
>> SSEU,
>> WORKINGSET,
>> + SKIP,
>> };
>> struct dep_entry {
>> @@ -930,6 +932,12 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int
>> flags, double scale_dur,
>> if (field) {
>> fstart = NULL;
>> + /* line starting with # is a comment */
>> + if (field[0] == '#') {
>> + step.type = SKIP;
>> + goto add_step;
>> + }
>
> Do they need to be recorded as steps and couldn't be simply silently
> skipped over while parsing?
Looks indeed a bool skip may be enough. It's a dummy step not stored in
workload steps.
>
> How does relative step referencing works when comments are present?
> (Batch implicit dependencies and 'a' and 's' commands.)
Comments may be added to existing workloads without a problem as the
SKIPs are not incrementing nr_step (does not create a record).
Maybe a small confusion is that step.idx does not correspond to line
number, so in case of failed parse we get a step number without a line :/
Regards,
Marcin
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
>
>> +
>> if (!strcmp(field, "d")) {
>> int_field(DELAY, delay, tmp <= 0,
>> "Invalid delay at step %u!\n");
>> @@ -1194,7 +1202,8 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int
>> flags, double scale_dur,
>> if (field) {
>> fstart = NULL;
>> - check_arg(strlen(field) != 1 ||
>> + check_arg(!strlen(field) ||
>> + (strlen(field) > 1 && !isspace(field[1]) &&
>> field[1] != '#') ||
>> (field[0] != '0' && field[0] != '1'),
>> "Invalid wait boolean at step %u!\n",
>> nr_steps);
>> @@ -1208,18 +1217,23 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int
>> flags, double scale_dur,
>> step.type = BATCH;
>> add_step:
>> - if (step.type == DELAY)
>> - step.delay = __duration(step.delay, scale_time);
>> + if (step.type == SKIP) {
>> + if (verbose > 3)
>> + printf("skipped STEP: %s\n", _token);
>> + } else {
>> + if (step.type == DELAY)
>> + step.delay = __duration(step.delay, scale_time);
>> - step.idx = nr_steps++;
>> - step.request = -1;
>> - steps = realloc(steps, sizeof(step) * nr_steps);
>> - igt_assert(steps);
>> + step.idx = nr_steps++;
>> + step.request = -1;
>> + steps = realloc(steps, sizeof(step) * nr_steps);
>> + igt_assert(steps);
>> - memcpy(&steps[nr_steps - 1], &step, sizeof(step));
>> + memcpy(&steps[nr_steps - 1], &step, sizeof(step));
>> + }
>> free(token);
>> - }
>> + } // while ((_token = strtok_r(tstart, ",", &tctx))) {
>> if (app_w) {
>> steps = realloc(steps, sizeof(step) *
>> @@ -2304,6 +2318,8 @@ static void *run_workload(void *data)
>> enum intel_engine_id engine = w->engine;
>> int do_sleep = 0;
>> + igt_assert(w->type != SKIP);
>> +
>> if (w->type == DELAY) {
>> do_sleep = w->delay;
>> } else if (w->type == PERIOD) {
>> @@ -2543,6 +2559,13 @@ static char *load_workload_descriptor(char
>> *filename)
>> close(infd);
>> for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>> + /* '#' starts comment till end of line */
>> + if (buf[i] == '#')
>> + /* replace ',' in comments to not break parsing */
>> + while (++i < len && buf[i] != '\n')
>> + if (buf[i] == ',')
>> + buf[i] = ';';
>> +
>> if (buf[i] == '\n')
>> buf[i] = ',';
>> }
>> diff --git a/benchmarks/wsim/README b/benchmarks/wsim/README
>> index 8c71f2fe6..e4fd61645 100644
>> --- a/benchmarks/wsim/README
>> +++ b/benchmarks/wsim/README
>> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
>> Workload descriptor format
>> ==========================
>> +Lines starting with '#' are treated as comments (do not create work
>> step).
>> +
>> ctx.engine.duration_us.dependency.wait,...
>> <uint>.<str>.<uint>[-<uint>]|*.<int <= 0>[/<int <= 0>][...].<0|1>,...
>> B.<uint>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-21 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-06 15:51 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/8] [RFC] benchmarks/gem_wsim: added basic xe support Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/8] lib/xe_spin: xe_spin_opts for xe_spin initialization Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-20 16:43 ` Kamil Konieczny
2023-09-21 15:08 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/8] lib/xe_spin: fixed duration xe_spin capability Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 3/8] lib/igt_device_scan: Xe get integrated/discrete card functions Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 4/8] benchmarks/gem_wsim: scale duration option fixes Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-20 16:06 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 5/8] benchmarks/gem_wsim: cleanups Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 6/8] benchmarks/gem_wsim: allow comments in workload description files Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-20 16:13 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-21 15:05 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin [this message]
2023-09-21 15:22 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-21 16:20 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-25 9:03 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 7/8] benchmarks/gem_wsim: extract prepare_ctxs function, add w_sync Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 8/8] [RFC] benchmarks/gem_wsim: added basic xe support Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-21 15:57 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-21 19:39 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-25 9:16 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-06 21:01 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for benchmarks/gem_wsim: added basic xe support (rev2) Patchwork
2023-09-07 9:30 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60135ff9-3153-ad28-0185-946a68db4eed@linux.intel.com \
--to=marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox