Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: "Bernatowicz, Marcin" <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>,
	igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 6/8] benchmarks/gem_wsim: allow comments in workload description files
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 16:22:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <622fb175-5ebe-ac40-0cf4-085e37efdace@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60135ff9-3153-ad28-0185-946a68db4eed@linux.intel.com>


On 21/09/2023 16:05, Bernatowicz, Marcin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 9/20/2023 6:13 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 06/09/2023 16:51, Marcin Bernatowicz wrote:
>>> Lines starting with '#' are skipped.
>>> If command line step separator (',') is encountered after '#'
>>> it is replaced with ';' to not break parsing.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>   benchmarks/gem_wsim.c  | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>>   benchmarks/wsim/README |  2 ++
>>>   2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
>>> index 0c1b58727..ec9fdc2d0 100644
>>> --- a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
>>> +++ b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
>>> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>>>   #include <limits.h>
>>>   #include <pthread.h>
>>>   #include <math.h>
>>> +#include <ctype.h>
>>>   #include "drm.h"
>>>   #include "drmtest.h"
>>> @@ -94,6 +95,7 @@ enum w_type {
>>>       TERMINATE,
>>>       SSEU,
>>>       WORKINGSET,
>>> +    SKIP,
>>>   };
>>>   struct dep_entry {
>>> @@ -930,6 +932,12 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int 
>>> flags, double scale_dur,
>>>           if (field) {
>>>               fstart = NULL;
>>> +            /* line starting with # is a comment */
>>> +            if (field[0] == '#') {
>>> +                step.type = SKIP;
>>> +                goto add_step;
>>> +            }
>>
>> Do they need to be recorded as steps and couldn't be simply silently 
>> skipped over while parsing?
> 
> Looks indeed a bool skip may be enough. It's a dummy step not stored in 
> workload steps.

Cool, that would be the best.

>>
>> How does relative step referencing works when comments are present? 
>> (Batch implicit dependencies and 'a' and 's' commands.)
> 
> Comments may be added to existing workloads without a problem as the 
> SKIPs are not incrementing nr_step (does not create a record).

Oookay, guess I was confused with the goto add_step. :)

> Maybe a small confusion is that step.idx does not correspond to line 
> number, so in case of failed parse we get a step number without a line :/

Hm? If parse fails the whole program fails so I didn't get this.

Regards,

Tvrtko

> 
> Regards,
> Marcin
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tvrtko
>>
>>> +
>>>               if (!strcmp(field, "d")) {
>>>                   int_field(DELAY, delay, tmp <= 0,
>>>                         "Invalid delay at step %u!\n");
>>> @@ -1194,7 +1202,8 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int 
>>> flags, double scale_dur,
>>>           if (field) {
>>>               fstart = NULL;
>>> -            check_arg(strlen(field) != 1 ||
>>> +            check_arg(!strlen(field) ||
>>> +                  (strlen(field) > 1 && !isspace(field[1]) && 
>>> field[1] != '#') ||
>>>                     (field[0] != '0' && field[0] != '1'),
>>>                     "Invalid wait boolean at step %u!\n",
>>>                     nr_steps);
>>> @@ -1208,18 +1217,23 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned 
>>> int flags, double scale_dur,
>>>           step.type = BATCH;
>>>   add_step:
>>> -        if (step.type == DELAY)
>>> -            step.delay = __duration(step.delay, scale_time);
>>> +        if (step.type == SKIP) {
>>> +            if (verbose > 3)
>>> +                printf("skipped STEP: %s\n", _token);
>>> +        } else {
>>> +            if (step.type == DELAY)
>>> +                step.delay = __duration(step.delay, scale_time);
>>> -        step.idx = nr_steps++;
>>> -        step.request = -1;
>>> -        steps = realloc(steps, sizeof(step) * nr_steps);
>>> -        igt_assert(steps);
>>> +            step.idx = nr_steps++;
>>> +            step.request = -1;
>>> +            steps = realloc(steps, sizeof(step) * nr_steps);
>>> +            igt_assert(steps);
>>> -        memcpy(&steps[nr_steps - 1], &step, sizeof(step));
>>> +            memcpy(&steps[nr_steps - 1], &step, sizeof(step));
>>> +        }
>>>           free(token);
>>> -    }
>>> +    } // while ((_token = strtok_r(tstart, ",", &tctx))) {
>>>       if (app_w) {
>>>           steps = realloc(steps, sizeof(step) *
>>> @@ -2304,6 +2318,8 @@ static void *run_workload(void *data)
>>>               enum intel_engine_id engine = w->engine;
>>>               int do_sleep = 0;
>>> +            igt_assert(w->type != SKIP);
>>> +
>>>               if (w->type == DELAY) {
>>>                   do_sleep = w->delay;
>>>               } else if (w->type == PERIOD) {
>>> @@ -2543,6 +2559,13 @@ static char *load_workload_descriptor(char 
>>> *filename)
>>>       close(infd);
>>>       for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>>> +        /* '#' starts comment till end of line */
>>> +        if (buf[i] == '#')
>>> +            /* replace ',' in comments to not break parsing */
>>> +            while (++i < len && buf[i] != '\n')
>>> +                if (buf[i] == ',')
>>> +                    buf[i] = ';';
>>> +
>>>           if (buf[i] == '\n')
>>>               buf[i] = ',';
>>>       }
>>> diff --git a/benchmarks/wsim/README b/benchmarks/wsim/README
>>> index 8c71f2fe6..e4fd61645 100644
>>> --- a/benchmarks/wsim/README
>>> +++ b/benchmarks/wsim/README
>>> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
>>>   Workload descriptor format
>>>   ==========================
>>> +Lines starting with '#' are treated as comments (do not create work 
>>> step).
>>> +
>>>   ctx.engine.duration_us.dependency.wait,...
>>>   <uint>.<str>.<uint>[-<uint>]|*.<int <= 0>[/<int <= 0>][...].<0|1>,...
>>>   B.<uint>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-21 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-06 15:51 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/8] [RFC] benchmarks/gem_wsim: added basic xe support Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/8] lib/xe_spin: xe_spin_opts for xe_spin initialization Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-20 16:43   ` Kamil Konieczny
2023-09-21 15:08     ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/8] lib/xe_spin: fixed duration xe_spin capability Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 3/8] lib/igt_device_scan: Xe get integrated/discrete card functions Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 4/8] benchmarks/gem_wsim: scale duration option fixes Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-20 16:06   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 5/8] benchmarks/gem_wsim: cleanups Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 6/8] benchmarks/gem_wsim: allow comments in workload description files Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-20 16:13   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-21 15:05     ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-21 15:22       ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2023-09-21 16:20         ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-25  9:03           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 7/8] benchmarks/gem_wsim: extract prepare_ctxs function, add w_sync Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 8/8] [RFC] benchmarks/gem_wsim: added basic xe support Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-21 15:57   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-21 19:39     ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-25  9:16       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-06 21:01 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for benchmarks/gem_wsim: added basic xe support (rev2) Patchwork
2023-09-07  9:30   ` Bernatowicz, Marcin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=622fb175-5ebe-ac40-0cf4-085e37efdace@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox